VanLearners Monday Evening January 19, 2026

No overalls in today's game.

Results for Section X, North-South
Pair#PercentScoreRankMPtsPlayers
X2N 62.50% 37.5010.36Jill Raphael - Howard Raphael
X3N 53.33% 32.0020.25Joan Christensen - Eiler Eis
X4N 49.17% 29.50Diane O Connor - Valerie Young
X1N 47.50% 28.50Vicki Torbett - Myrna Halpenny
X5N 46.67% 28.00Zdenka Buric - Marcia Smith
X6N 40.83% 24.50Niamh Kelly - Donna Bridgeman
East-West had 50.09% of the highcard points in today's deals.
The average freakness rating of today's deals (measuring the amount of distribution in the dealset as a whole) was 10.71, a bit below the average of about 11.93.
Results for Section X, East-West
Pair#PercentScoreRankMPtsPlayers
X6E 59.17% 35.5010.36David Stokes - Doug MacDougall
X4E 57.50% 34.5020.25Lea Stanlake - Lynne Pomfret
X2E 55.83% 33.50Doug Stewart - Louise Forsyth
X5E 49.17% 29.50Jill Price - Barbara Spitz
X1E 41.67% 25.00Ron Rogers - Patsy Thorpe
X3E 36.67% 22.00Gaye Ballantyne - Judy Day
East-West had 50.09% of the highcard points in today's deals.
The average freakness rating of today's deals (measuring the amount of distribution in the dealset as a whole) was 10.71, a bit below the average of about 11.93.
Board 1 Results
North-South Pair#NS
%
NS
MP
NS
Score
Contract
& Result
Op.
Ld.
EW
Score
EW
MP
EW
%
Pair# East-West
Vicki Torbett &
Myrna Halpenny
X1N63 2.50901NTs=♥︎7 1.5038X1ERon Rogers &
Patsy Thorpe
Diane O Connor &
Valerie Young
X4N63 2.50901NTs=♥︎7 1.5038X6EDavid Stokes &
Doug MacDougall
Niamh Kelly &
Donna Bridgeman
X6N63 2.50901NTs=♠︎K 1.5038X5EJill Price &
Barbara Spitz
Zdenka Buric &
Marcia Smith
X5N63 2.50901NTs=♥︎8 1.5038X3EGaye Ballantyne &
Judy Day
Joan Christensen &
Eiler Eis
X3N0 0.002♥︎w=♦︎4110 4.00100X4ELea Stanlake &
Lynne Pomfret
Section A Scores (two weeks ago)
ContractLeadResultN-S ScoreE-W Score
1Ns7♥︎+1 120
1Ns7♥︎= 90
1Ns7♥︎= 90
1Ns7♥︎= 90
1Nn6♣︎-1 50
2♣︎w2♥︎= 90
After two passes, South opens 1NT and plays it there. West is on lead against 1NT and the most popular choice from Section A was the 7♥︎, fourth best from longest and strongest. But since South begins with four diamond winners and two black aces, a low heart lead hands South a seventh trick on a silver platter. It might just be better to find a lead from a holding that doesn't look like it might easily cost a trick. JACK's choice is the T♣︎: South ducks and East wins the Q♣︎, returning a heart. South ducks again and West wins the Q♥︎ and continues clubs. On this better start the defenders have a decent chance to beat the contract.
#1 D NORTH       Jan. 19, 2026
♠︎ T63Dealer: N
♥︎ T92 None Vul
N WEST      ♦︎ T954N  EAST      
♠︎KQ5♣︎ AJ7♠︎9842
♥︎AQ87♥︎J65
♦︎72N SOUTH       ♦︎J86
♣︎T986♠︎AJ7♣︎KQ2
5♥︎K430
11HCP7♦︎AKQ31FRK0
17♣︎5430
Tricks Available (best play by both sides)
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
by
N
65576by
E
67867
by
S
75576by
W
67867
Board 2 Results
North-South Pair#NS
%
NS
MP
NS
Score
Contract
& Result
Op.
Ld.
EW
Score
EW
MP
EW
%
Pair# East-West
Niamh Kelly &
Donna Bridgeman
X6N100 4.001403♥︎n=♠︎5 0.000X5EJill Price &
Barbara Spitz
Joan Christensen &
Eiler Eis
X3N63 2.501102♥︎n=♣︎A 1.5038X4ELea Stanlake &
Lynne Pomfret
Diane O Connor &
Valerie Young
X4N63 2.501102♦︎s+1♣︎5 1.5038X6EDavid Stokes &
Doug MacDougall
Zdenka Buric &
Marcia Smith
X5N25 1.004♥︎n–1♦︎K100 3.0075X3EGaye Ballantyne &
Judy Day
Vicki Torbett &
Myrna Halpenny
X1N0 0.003♦︎s–3♥︎3300 4.00100X1ERon Rogers &
Patsy Thorpe
Section A Scores (two weeks ago)
ContractLeadResultN-S ScoreE-W Score
3♥︎n3♣︎+1 170
2♠︎w2♥︎-3 150
2♥︎nK♦︎+1 140
2♥︎nK♦︎+1 140
2♥︎nJ♠︎+1 140
2♦︎s5♣︎+1 110
East passes and South opens 1♦︎. West passes, North responds 1♥︎, and East bids 1NT. What can this be? Not a 15-17 1NT by a passed hand, it must be some sort of weak takeout with spades and clubs. South has a good answer, a support double. This double by opener after partner responds 1♥︎ or 1♠︎ and the next player bids or doubles, shows three-card support for partner's major. (If RHO doubles it would be a support redouble.) West bids 2♠︎ but North has enough to bid 4♥︎. Unfortunately, the cards are not well-placed for North, with KJ9♥︎ over QT8♥︎ and a singleton K♦︎ offside. 4♥︎ is a decent contract that will likely go one down. Unlucky!
#2 V NORTH       Jan. 19, 2026
♠︎ Q9Dealer: E
♥︎ QT872 NS Vul
N WEST      ♦︎ AQJD  EAST      
♠︎K432♣︎ K43♠︎JT85
♥︎53♥︎KJ9
♦︎8653V SOUTH       ♦︎K
♣︎T95♠︎A76♣︎A8762
14♥︎A642
3HCP12♦︎T97421FRK4
11♣︎QJ2
Tricks Available (best play by both sides)
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
by
N
107996by
E
36436
by
S
96996by
W
36436
Board 3 Results
North-South Pair#NS
%
NS
MP
NS
Score
Contract
& Result
Op.
Ld.
EW
Score
EW
MP
EW
%
Pair# East-West
Vicki Torbett &
Myrna Halpenny
X1N100 4.004003NTs=♠︎3 0.000X1ERon Rogers &
Patsy Thorpe
Zdenka Buric &
Marcia Smith
X5N75 3.003002NTe–3♠︎5 1.0025X3EGaye Ballantyne &
Judy Day
Joan Christensen &
Eiler Eis
X3N50 2.001402♠︎s+1♦︎6 2.0050X4ELea Stanlake &
Lynne Pomfret
Diane O Connor &
Valerie Young
X4N25 1.003♣︎n–1♦︎K50 3.0075X6EDavid Stokes &
Doug MacDougall
Niamh Kelly &
Donna Bridgeman
X6N0 0.002♦︎e=♠︎590 4.00100X5EJill Price &
Barbara Spitz
Section A Scores (two weeks ago)
ContractLeadResultN-S ScoreE-W Score
3♦︎e*3♣︎-2 500
3♦︎eA♠︎-2 200
3♣︎nK♦︎= 110
2♠︎sT♦︎= 110
3♠︎s8♥︎-2 100
3♠︎s*7♥︎-3 500
South and West pass and North opens 1♣︎. East might start with 2NT, the Unusual Notrump, showing hearts and diamonds. But there is a better way: start with a simple 1♦︎ overcall and hope to bid hearts next round. This paints a more accurate picture, a two-suiter with better diamonds. South responds 1♠︎, West passes, and North rebids 1NT. East now bids 2♥︎ and West should realize that this cannot be a mere four-card side suit, this shows five hearts with five or more diamonds. South bids 3♣︎, and West passes. North passes and East needs to realize that his story is told and pass. 3♦︎ gets doubled for -500, while 3♣︎ costs only -110 and may go down.
#3 N NORTH       Jan. 19, 2026
♠︎ K9Dealer: S
♥︎ AKT3 EW Vul
V WEST      ♦︎ A84V  EAST      
♠︎QJ7632♣︎ T742♠︎
♥︎87♥︎J9654
♦︎T6D SOUTH       ♦︎KQ9532
♣︎Q85♠︎AT854♣︎AJ
14♥︎Q21
5HCP11♦︎J74FRK9
10♣︎K9633
Tricks Available (best play by both sides)
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
by
N
78769by
E
45672
by
S
78769by
W
45672
Board 4 Results
North-South Pair#NS
%
NS
MP
NS
Score
Contract
& Result
Op.
Ld.
EW
Score
EW
MP
EW
%
Pair# East-West
Jill Raphael &
Howard Raphael
X2N75 3.002♥︎w=♠︎6110 1.0025X2EDoug Stewart &
Louise Forsyth
Zdenka Buric &
Marcia Smith
X5N75 3.002♥︎w=♣︎7110 1.0025X1ERon Rogers &
Patsy Thorpe
Diane O Connor &
Valerie Young
X4N75 3.002♥︎w=♠︎6110 1.0025X5EJill Price &
Barbara Spitz
Vicki Torbett &
Myrna Halpenny
X1N25 1.002♥︎w+1♣︎6140 3.0075X6EDavid Stokes &
Doug MacDougall
Niamh Kelly &
Donna Bridgeman
X6N0 0.002NTw+1♣︎2150 4.00100X4ELea Stanlake &
Lynne Pomfret
Section A Scores (two weeks ago)
ContractLeadResultN-S ScoreE-W Score
2Nw8♥︎-1 100
3Nw6♣︎-1 100
1♦︎w6♠︎-1 100
1♦︎w8♠︎+1 90
3♥︎w8♠︎= 140
2Nw6♣︎+1 150
North-South stay out of this auction and all roads lead to 3NT by West: either West opens 1♦︎ (1♦︎ - 1♠︎, 2NT - 3♣︎*, 3♥︎ - 3NT, Pass: 2NT shows 18-19 balanced and 3♣︎ is a form of New Minor Forcing looking for a possible major suit fit: 3♥︎ is West admitting to a four-card heart suit, and 3NT is East saying "I was actually looking for a 5-3 spade fit" so West passes and plays 3NT; OR West adds a point for three aces and opens 2NT: (2NT - 3♥︎*, 3♠︎ - 3NT, Pass: 3♥︎ is a transfer and 3NT says East has exactly five spades.) A club lead gets the defenders four tricks but South will be squeezed on the run of the hearts into discarding a crucial diamond or a spade honour. Try it and see!
#4 V NORTH       Jan. 19, 2026
♠︎ 86Dealer: W
♥︎ 8652 All Vul
D WEST      ♦︎ T94V  EAST      
♠︎AJ♣︎ AQ76♠︎T9432
♥︎AQT7♥︎K94
♦︎AK52V SOUTH       ♦︎Q6
♣︎J98♠︎KQ75♣︎T52
6♥︎J31
19HCP5♦︎J8731FRK2
10♣︎K431
Tricks Available (best play by both sides)
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
by
N
54455by
E
88988
by
S
54455by
W
88988
Board 5 Results
North-South Pair#NS
%
NS
MP
NS
Score
Contract
& Result
Op.
Ld.
EW
Score
EW
MP
EW
%
Pair# East-West
Jill Raphael &
Howard Raphael
X2N88 3.502NTw=♣︎4120 0.5013X2EDoug Stewart &
Louise Forsyth
Zdenka Buric &
Marcia Smith
X5N88 3.502NTw=♣︎4120 0.5013X1ERon Rogers &
Patsy Thorpe
Vicki Torbett &
Myrna Halpenny
X1N50 2.003♦︎w+1♣︎4130 2.0050X6EDavid Stokes &
Doug MacDougall
Diane O Connor &
Valerie Young
X4N13 0.503NTw+1♣︎4430 3.5088X5EJill Price &
Barbara Spitz
Niamh Kelly &
Donna Bridgeman
X6N13 0.503NTw+1♣︎4430 3.5088X4ELea Stanlake &
Lynne Pomfret
Section A Scores (two weeks ago)
ContractLeadResultN-S ScoreE-W Score
3Nw2♥︎-1 50
1Nw5♣︎+2 150
2Nw4♥︎+2 180
2Nw4♣︎+2 180
3Ne7♥︎= 400
3Nw4♣︎+1 430
West opens 1♣︎ in fourth seat, intending to rebid 2NT to show 18-19 balanced. East responds 1♦︎ and West gets to complete the plan. East raises to 3NT and it looks like trouble when North finds the killing heart lead, setting up four heart tricks to go with the A♦︎ that South must eventually get. But if West ducks the first heart and then at trick two takes the A♥︎ when South returns a heart, North has a dilemma: play low and keep the K♥︎, blocking the suit, or jettison the K♥︎, making West's T♥︎ a second stopper? North will likely play low, and West leads a diamond; South wins and leads a heart and North cannot return another! West gets three spades, a heart, four diamonds and the A♣︎!
#5 D NORTH       Jan. 19, 2026
♠︎ 84Dealer: N
♥︎ K42 NS Vul
N WEST      ♦︎ 653N  EAST      
♠︎AKQ♣︎ KQ842♠︎JT7
♥︎AT53♥︎9
♦︎KQ2V SOUTH       ♦︎JT984
♣︎J96♠︎96532♣︎AT73
8♥︎QJ8762
19HCP6♦︎A70FRK4
7♣︎56
Tricks Available (best play by both sides)
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
by
N
45724by
E
976119
by
S
45724by
W
976119
Board 6 Results
North-South Pair#NS
%
NS
MP
NS
Score
Contract
& Result
Op.
Ld.
EW
Score
EW
MP
EW
%
Pair# East-West
Niamh Kelly &
Donna Bridgeman
X6N100 4.004903NTn+3♦︎5 0.000X4ELea Stanlake &
Lynne Pomfret
Diane O Connor &
Valerie Young
X4N63 2.504603NTn+2♠︎3 1.5038X5EJill Price &
Barbara Spitz
Zdenka Buric &
Marcia Smith
X5N63 2.504605NTn=♣︎2 1.5038X1ERon Rogers &
Patsy Thorpe
Vicki Torbett &
Myrna Halpenny
X1N25 1.004003NTn=♦︎5 3.0075X6EDavid Stokes &
Doug MacDougall
Jill Raphael &
Howard Raphael
X2N0 0.006NTs–1♥︎450 4.00100X2EDoug Stewart &
Louise Forsyth
Section A Scores (two weeks ago)
ContractLeadResultN-S ScoreE-W Score
3Nn5♦︎+3 490
3Ns6♥︎+3 490
3Nn5♦︎+2 460
3Nn5♦︎+2 460
3Nn5♦︎+1 430
3Nn5♦︎= 400
no comment on this board
#6 N NORTH       Jan. 19, 2026
♠︎ Q8Dealer: E
♥︎ AKJ5 EW Vul
V WEST      ♦︎ QJ4D  EAST      
♠︎KJ96♣︎ AQ76♠︎743
♥︎Q974♥︎T86
♦︎T8N SOUTH       ♦︎K765
♣︎T85♠︎AT52♣︎J42
19♥︎321
6HCP4♦︎A9321FRK0
11♣︎K931
Tricks Available (best play by both sides)
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
by
N
1211111112by
E
12111
by
S
1211121212by
W
12111
Board 7 Results
North-South Pair#NS
%
NS
MP
NS
Score
Contract
& Result
Op.
Ld.
EW
Score
EW
MP
EW
%
Pair# East-West
Joan Christensen &
Eiler Eis
X3N100 4.006303NTs+1♦︎J 0.000X3EGaye Ballantyne &
Judy Day
Vicki Torbett &
Myrna Halpenny
X1N75 3.006003NTs=♣︎3 1.0025X5EJill Price &
Barbara Spitz
Niamh Kelly &
Donna Bridgeman
X6N50 2.001702♠︎s+2♥︎T 2.0050X2EDoug Stewart &
Louise Forsyth
Zdenka Buric &
Marcia Smith
X5N25 1.003NTs–1♣︎3100 3.0075X6EDavid Stokes &
Doug MacDougall
Jill Raphael &
Howard Raphael
X2N0 0.006NTs–3♦︎3300 4.00100X1ERon Rogers &
Patsy Thorpe
Section A Scores (two weeks ago)
ContractLeadResultN-S ScoreE-W Score
3Nn3♥︎+2 660
3Ns3♣︎+1 630
3Nn5♥︎= 600
3Nn3♥︎= 600
3Nn4♣︎= 600
3Nn3♥︎-1 100
South opens 1♠︎ and West passes. In a modern system, North would need more than ten points to bid a game-forcing 2♦︎ and would bid a forcing 1NT. South would raise to 2NT showing a good hand with only five spades, and 3NT would be reached. In standard, North can bid 2♦︎, for it is forcing for only one round. It also should uncover a possible fit in hearts if there is one, for South will rebid hearts with a side four-card suit. In fact, South rebids 3NT and it's a contest for overtricks. West leads a club to dummy's jack, East's queen, and South's ace. South crosses to the K♥︎ to run the 8♠︎ at trick three. West wins and — oops! — leads another club, and South has eleven tricks when the K♦︎ is onside.
#7 V NORTH       Jan. 19, 2026
♠︎ 83Dealer: S
♥︎ K982 All Vul
V WEST      ♦︎ AQ876V  EAST      
♠︎Q72♣︎ J2♠︎J54
♥︎T4♥︎QJ73
♦︎KJT3D SOUTH       ♦︎94
♣︎T873♠︎AKT96♣︎Q654
10♥︎A653
6HCP6♦︎521FRK1
18♣︎AK92
Tricks Available (best play by both sides)
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
by
N
1111111110by
E
22223
by
S
1111111110by
W
22223
Board 8 Results
North-South Pair#NS
%
NS
MP
NS
Score
Contract
& Result
Op.
Ld.
EW
Score
EW
MP
EW
%
Pair# East-West
Jill Raphael &
Howard Raphael
X2N100 4.004603NTn+2♥︎2 0.000X1ERon Rogers &
Patsy Thorpe
Niamh Kelly &
Donna Bridgeman
X6N75 3.004003NTn=♣︎2 1.0025X2EDoug Stewart &
Louise Forsyth
Vicki Torbett &
Myrna Halpenny
X1N50 2.001703♠︎n+1♠︎2 2.0050X5EJill Price &
Barbara Spitz
Joan Christensen &
Eiler Eis
X3N25 1.004♥︎n–1♠︎350 3.0075X3EGaye Ballantyne &
Judy Day
Zdenka Buric &
Marcia Smith
X5N0 0.004NTn–2♣︎4100 4.00100X6EDavid Stokes &
Doug MacDougall
Section A Scores (two weeks ago)
ContractLeadResultN-S ScoreE-W Score
3Nn7♣︎+2 460
3Nn2♣︎= 400
3Nn4♣︎= 400
5♥︎n3♦︎-3 150
4♥︎n2♥︎-3 150
6♥︎s*K♣︎-3 500
West passes and North opens 2NT, and after East passes it is up to South to decide what to do with partner's 20-21 balanced hand. The first step is clear, 3♦︎ to transfer to hearts. After North bids 3♥︎ as requested, what next? 3NT says "I have exactly five hearts, you decide which game to play," and North will pass and play 3NT. But the club void and the two five-card suits are enticing, and many chose a 4♦︎ rebid to show hearts and diamonds. Three pairs got confused and played in hearts somehow (4♦︎ is not a re-transfer, it shows a side five-card suit), and sadly the defenders assets are well placed against 5♦︎ or 6♦︎, so the 3NTers win the day this time.
#8 N NORTH       Jan. 19, 2026
♠︎ KJ65Dealer: W
♥︎ KJ None Vul
D WEST      ♦︎ AQ83N  EAST      
♠︎84♣︎ AQ3♠︎AT93
♥︎AT876♥︎2
♦︎4N SOUTH       ♦︎T52
♣︎KJ985♠︎Q72♣︎T7642
20♥︎Q95431
8HCP4♦︎KJ9766FRK4
8♣︎7
Tricks Available (best play by both sides)
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
by
N
1099104by
E
33429
by
S
1099104by
W
33428
Board 9 Results
North-South Pair#NS
%
NS
MP
NS
Score
Contract
& Result
Op.
Ld.
EW
Score
EW
MP
EW
%
Pair# East-West
Zdenka Buric &
Marcia Smith
X5N100 4.004504♥︎s+1♦︎A 0.000X6EDavid Stokes &
Doug MacDougall
Niamh Kelly &
Donna Bridgeman
X6N75 3.004204♥︎s=♦︎3 1.0025X2EDoug Stewart &
Louise Forsyth
Jill Raphael &
Howard Raphael
X2N50 2.003003NTe–3♥︎6 2.0050X1ERon Rogers &
Patsy Thorpe
Vicki Torbett &
Myrna Halpenny
X1N25 1.002002♥︎s+3♠︎K 3.0075X5EJill Price &
Barbara Spitz
Joan Christensen &
Eiler Eis
X3N0 0.001703♥︎s+1♣︎9 4.00100X3EGaye Ballantyne &
Judy Day
Section A Scores (two weeks ago)
ContractLeadResultN-S ScoreE-W Score
3NeQ♥︎-3 300
1Ne6♥︎-3 300
3♥︎s7♥︎+2 200
1Ne5♥︎-2 200
2♥︎s5♣︎+1 140
1NeQ♥︎-1 100
North opens 1♠︎ as the least worst choice (pass and 2♠︎ are more flawed) and East overcalls 1NT. South jumps to 3♥︎ despite only seven points, picturing a potential crossruff goldmine. West passes and North raises to 4♥︎ on the strength of what must be unexpected four-card support for hearts and a side singleton. East is wise not to double this, for it makes easily, possibly with an overtrick. Eleven tricks on a combined eighteen points is a good example of the effect of distribution on a deal. (I think the player who made only nine tricks in hearts did so by failing to follow suit and paying a penalty...)
#9 D NORTH       Jan. 19, 2026
♠︎ QJ8765Dealer: N
♥︎ K842 EW Vul
V WEST      ♦︎ 9V  EAST      
♠︎T93♣︎ AJ♠︎AK42
♥︎7♥︎AT
♦︎AT53N SOUTH       ♦︎KJ4
♣︎K9652♠︎♣︎T743
11♥︎QJ96536
7HCP15♦︎Q87624FRK1
7♣︎Q89
Tricks Available (best play by both sides)
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
by
N
761153by
E
652810
by
S
761053by
W
652810
Board 10 Results
North-South Pair#NS
%
NS
MP
NS
Score
Contract
& Result
Op.
Ld.
EW
Score
EW
MP
EW
%
Pair# East-West
Jill Raphael &
Howard Raphael
X2N100 4.001004♦︎w–1♥︎Q 0.000X6EDavid Stokes &
Doug MacDougall
Diane O Connor &
Valerie Young
X4N75 3.002♠︎s–1♣︎7100 1.0025X4ELea Stanlake &
Lynne Pomfret
Vicki Torbett &
Myrna Halpenny
X1N50 2.002♦︎w+1♠︎J110 2.0050X3EGaye Ballantyne &
Judy Day
Niamh Kelly &
Donna Bridgeman
X6N25 1.002♦︎w+2♠︎J130 3.0075X1ERon Rogers &
Patsy Thorpe
Joan Christensen &
Eiler Eis
X3N0 0.002NTe+1♠︎8150 4.00100X2EDoug Stewart &
Louise Forsyth
Section A Scores (two weeks ago)
ContractLeadResultN-S ScoreE-W Score
5♣︎e6♣︎-2 200
1NwJ♠︎= 90
2♣︎eT♦︎+1 110
3♣︎eK♥︎= 110
3♣︎e2♠︎+1 130
3♦︎e*5♥︎+1 770
East opens 1♣︎ and South overcalls 1♠︎. West passes and North has no reason to bid over 1♠︎ — overcalls are not forcing and too many players bid with hands like the North hand, hoping to improve the contract but usually making it worse. A new suit by the partner of the overcaller is a positive move, not a desparate escape! East rebids 2♣︎ and West raises to 3♣︎, and the auction ends. South is rightfully wary of leading a spade away from the A-Q, and instead tries to get partner in with the T♦︎ lead. It works, partner wins the ace and shoots back a spade, ruffing the third round. But, East-West have the rest and 110 should be the normal result.
#10 V NORTH       Jan. 19, 2026
♠︎ J4Dealer: E
♥︎ Q98643 All Vul
V WEST      ♦︎ A52D  EAST      
♠︎763♣︎ 52♠︎KT5
♥︎AT5♥︎7
♦︎KJ84V SOUTH       ♦︎Q763
♣︎873♠︎AQ982♣︎AKQJ9
7♥︎KJ24
8HCP15♦︎T90FRK4
10♣︎T642
Tricks Available (best play by both sides)
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
by
N
48944by
E
65399
by
S
48944by
W
65389
Board 11 Results
North-South Pair#NS
%
NS
MP
NS
Score
Contract
& Result
Op.
Ld.
EW
Score
EW
MP
EW
%
Pair# East-West
Vicki Torbett &
Myrna Halpenny
X1N75 3.001003♠︎e–2♥︎A 1.0025X3EGaye Ballantyne &
Judy Day
Joan Christensen &
Eiler Eis
X3N75 3.001004♠︎e–2♥︎A 1.0025X2EDoug Stewart &
Louise Forsyth
Niamh Kelly &
Donna Bridgeman
X6N75 3.001003♠︎e–2♦︎J 1.0025X1ERon Rogers &
Patsy Thorpe
Jill Raphael &
Howard Raphael
X2N25 1.000PASS0 3.0075X6EDavid Stokes &
Doug MacDougall
Diane O Connor &
Valerie Young
X4N0 0.004♠︎e=♦︎Q420 4.00100X4ELea Stanlake &
Lynne Pomfret
Section A Scores (two weeks ago)
ContractLeadResultN-S ScoreE-W Score
4♠︎eA♥︎-3 150
4♠︎eA♥︎-2 100
2♠︎eA♥︎= 110
2♠︎eA♥︎+1 140
2Nw2♥︎+1 150
1Nw2♥︎+2 150
North-South stay out of this auction, which beginning with West goes: 1♣︎ - 1♠︎, 1NT - 2♦︎*, 2♠︎ - Pass. East's big question after West rebids 1NT, showing 12-14 balanced, is "could partner have three-card support for spades?" One way to find out is to use the New Minor Forcing convention. East's 2♦︎ rebid says nothing about diamonds but promises 11 points or more and says "we may have a major suit fit here, is there something you can tell me?" West's 2♠︎ says "I have three spades but a minimum hand of 12 or a bad 13." On this deal, it works well, as eight tricks are all East-West can make against good defense. "NMF" is a good convention to look up online on Wikipedia and learn.
#11 N NORTH       Jan. 19, 2026
♠︎ 5Dealer: S
♥︎ K872 None Vul
N WEST      ♦︎ 7532N  EAST      
♠︎Q84♣︎ KJ83♠︎AJT92
♥︎QJ53♥︎T96
♦︎KT9D SOUTH       ♦︎A86
♣︎AT7♠︎K763♣︎Q5
7♥︎A43
12HCP11♦︎QJ40FRK2
10♣︎96421
Tricks Available (best play by both sides)
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
by
N
55578by
E
88865
by
S
55578by
W
88765
Board 12 Results
North-South Pair#NS
%
NS
MP
NS
Score
Contract
& Result
Op.
Ld.
EW
Score
EW
MP
EW
%
Pair# East-West
Vicki Torbett &
Myrna Halpenny
X1N75 3.001503♦︎n+2♥︎2 1.0025X3EGaye Ballantyne &
Judy Day
Jill Raphael &
Howard Raphael
X2N75 3.001504♦︎n+1♥︎5 1.0025X6EDavid Stokes &
Doug MacDougall
Diane O Connor &
Valerie Young
X4N75 3.001504♦︎n+1♥︎5 1.0025X4ELea Stanlake &
Lynne Pomfret
Joan Christensen &
Eiler Eis
X3N25 1.001303♦︎n+1♣︎5 3.0075X2EDoug Stewart &
Louise Forsyth
Niamh Kelly &
Donna Bridgeman
X6N0 0.005♦︎n–1♥︎2100 4.00100X1ERon Rogers &
Patsy Thorpe
Section A Scores (two weeks ago)
ContractLeadResultN-S ScoreE-W Score
3Ns4♥︎+2 660
5♦︎nA♠︎= 600
4♦︎nQ♦︎+1 150
5♥︎e3♦︎-3 150
3♦︎n5♥︎+1 130
5♦︎n5♥︎-1 100
West passes and North: normal 1♦︎ or a pre-empt? With some defensive values in clubs, probably 1♦︎ is best, but North should mentally fasten his seatbelt for this may be a bumpy ride. East overcalls 1♥︎, and South responds 1♠︎, promising at least five, since most hands with four spades would make a negative double. West raises to 3♥︎ and it is time for North to act. North blasts to 5♦︎, giving East-West the last guess: double? pass? bid on? If East-West goof up the defence, 5♦︎ might make, but usually will go down. The limit for East-West in hearts is nine tricks, but they may get ten on a good day.
#12 V NORTH       Jan. 19, 2026
♠︎ 5Dealer: W
♥︎ T NS Vul
D WEST      ♦︎ AKJT9752N  EAST      
♠︎T96♣︎ KQ6♠︎AQ74
♥︎AJ643♥︎Q8752
♦︎8V SOUTH       ♦︎Q
♣︎T932♠︎KJ832♣︎A85
13♥︎K99
5HCP14♦︎6434FRK4
8♣︎J742
Tricks Available (best play by both sides)
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
by
N
664105by
E
56938
by
S
664105by
W
56938
Board 13 Results
North-South Pair#NS
%
NS
MP
NS
Score
Contract
& Result
Op.
Ld.
EW
Score
EW
MP
EW
%
Pair# East-West
Joan Christensen &
Eiler Eis
X3N100 4.001201NTs+1♦︎9 0.000X1ERon Rogers &
Patsy Thorpe
Diane O Connor &
Valerie Young
X4N75 3.001001♥︎e–1♦︎3 1.0025X3EGaye Ballantyne &
Judy Day
Vicki Torbett &
Myrna Halpenny
X1N50 2.00901NTs=♦︎6 2.0050X2EDoug Stewart &
Louise Forsyth
Jill Raphael &
Howard Raphael
X2N25 1.002NTs–1♦︎6100 3.0075X4ELea Stanlake &
Lynne Pomfret
Zdenka Buric &
Marcia Smith
X5N0 0.003NTs–2♠︎7200 4.00100X5EJill Price &
Barbara Spitz
Section A Scores (two weeks ago)
ContractLeadResultN-S ScoreE-W Score
4♥︎e*A♦︎-2 500
4♠︎w4♦︎-3 300
2Ns9♦︎= 120
2♠︎e2♥︎-1 100
3♥︎w4♦︎-1 100
4♥︎w4♦︎= 620
Focus in on the East hand only. North opens 1♦︎ and you bid 2♦︎, a Michaels Cuebid showing both majors. South passes and partner, West, bids 2♠︎. North passes and you're going to bid more, right? Three aces, the diamond void, looks like there is a chance at game, and it might even be right to bid it directly. But if partner took two minutes of hemming, hawing, and groaning to bid 2♠︎, you might just pass, and on this layout, avoid trouble. But basing your call on HOW partner bid it is not fair to the opponents, and not legal, so it is best for West to bid 2♠︎ without histrionics or deep thought, and avoid giving East the problem. When forced to bid, do so without passing extra information.
#13 D NORTH       Jan. 19, 2026
♠︎ K43Dealer: N
♥︎ KQ8 All Vul
V WEST      ♦︎ Q7542V  EAST      
♠︎75♣︎ K2♠︎AT862
♥︎64♥︎AT953
♦︎KJT96V SOUTH       ♦︎
♣︎9754♠︎QJ9♣︎AJ8
13♥︎J722
4HCP13♦︎A833FRK7
10♣︎QT630
Tricks Available (best play by both sides)
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
by
N
75576by
E
67665
by
S
75576by
W
67665
Board 14 Results
North-South Pair#NS
%
NS
MP
NS
Score
Contract
& Result
Op.
Ld.
EW
Score
EW
MP
EW
%
Pair# East-West
Jill Raphael &
Howard Raphael
X2N100 4.001503NTe–3♣︎5 0.000X4ELea Stanlake &
Lynne Pomfret
Joan Christensen &
Eiler Eis
X3N75 3.00503♠︎w–1♣︎6 1.0025X1ERon Rogers &
Patsy Thorpe
Vicki Torbett &
Myrna Halpenny
X1N50 2.002♠︎w+1♦︎A140 2.0050X2EDoug Stewart &
Louise Forsyth
Zdenka Buric &
Marcia Smith
X5N13 0.503♠︎w+1♣︎2170 3.5088X5EJill Price &
Barbara Spitz
Diane O Connor &
Valerie Young
X4N13 0.503♠︎w+1♣︎T170 3.5088X3EGaye Ballantyne &
Judy Day
Section A Scores (two weeks ago)
ContractLeadResultN-S ScoreE-W Score
4♠︎w8♣︎-2 100
4♠︎wT♣︎-1 50
2♠︎wT♣︎+1 140
2♠︎wA♦︎+1 140
2♠︎w5♣︎+2 170
4♠︎wT♣︎= 420
East and South pass and West opens 1♠︎, a bargain basement suit but certainly enough outside spades to open the bidding. North overcalls 2♣︎ and East has a near opener and knows there is an eight-card spade fit. Having passed originally, the only forcing call is a cuebid of 3♣︎, which shows a good hand with spade support, as good a hand as a passed hand can have. West has no trouble raising to 4♠︎ with 12 plus what may be a key singleton in diamonds. North leads the T♣︎ and West overtakes with the ace in hand to lead a spade to the king, North ducking. K♣︎, A♥︎, J♣︎ pitching a heart from dummy, and South ruffs, but the defenders get only two trumps and a diamond. Making four!
#14 N NORTH       Jan. 19, 2026
♠︎ AJDealer: E
♥︎ QT2 None Vul
N WEST      ♦︎ A7D  EAST      
♠︎98642♣︎ T98632♠︎KT7
♥︎AK43♥︎J97
♦︎9N SOUTH       ♦︎QT643
♣︎AJ4♠︎Q53♣︎KQ
11♥︎8654
12HCP11♦︎KJ8524FRK2
6♣︎752
Tricks Available (best play by both sides)
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
by
N
53477by
E
710866
by
S
53477by
W
810866
Board 15 Results
North-South Pair#NS
%
NS
MP
NS
Score
Contract
& Result
Op.
Ld.
EW
Score
EW
MP
EW
%
Pair# East-West
Diane O Connor &
Valerie Young
X4N100 4.001102♦︎s+1♥︎T 0.000X3EGaye Ballantyne &
Judy Day
Joan Christensen &
Eiler Eis
X3N63 2.50501NTe–1♣︎5 1.5038X1ERon Rogers &
Patsy Thorpe
Zdenka Buric &
Marcia Smith
X5N63 2.50503♥︎w–1♠︎3 1.5038X5EJill Price &
Barbara Spitz
Jill Raphael &
Howard Raphael
X2N25 1.002♥︎e+1♠︎T140 3.0075X4ELea Stanlake &
Lynne Pomfret
Vicki Torbett &
Myrna Halpenny
X1N0 0.003♣︎s–2♥︎6200 4.00100X2EDoug Stewart &
Louise Forsyth
Section A Scores (two weeks ago)
ContractLeadResultN-S ScoreE-W Score
1Ne4♣︎-1 50
2♥︎wQ♣︎-1 50
3♥︎eK♠︎-1 50
2♣︎s2♠︎-1 100
1Ne8♥︎+1 120
1♠︎nQ♥︎-2 200
Three passes to East, who opens 1NT. South passes and West does as well — no, wait, West is bidding 2♣︎! With only three points? West has a sneaky plan, bid the Stayman 2♣︎, and pass the response. If East does not have a four-card major and bids 2♦︎, it is likely that East will have at least four diamonds. Normally a Stayman call promises eight points, but East should not assume so and make the appropriate response, even with a maximum. East bids 2♥︎ and makes it without much trouble if East can lose two spades only. This little strategy actually has a name that will make you laugh: it's called Garbage Stayman!
#15 V NORTH       Jan. 19, 2026
♠︎ KQ83Dealer: S
♥︎ 94 NS Vul
N WEST      ♦︎ K872N  EAST      
♠︎J742♣︎ QT2♠︎A965
♥︎JT76♥︎AKQ2
♦︎T96D SOUTH       ♦︎54
♣︎J7♠︎T♣︎A63
10♥︎8531
3HCP17♦︎AQJ31FRK1
10♣︎K98544
Tricks Available (best play by both sides)
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
by
N
65598by
E
68844
by
S
65498by
W
68844
Board 16 Results
North-South Pair#NS
%
NS
MP
NS
Score
Contract
& Result
Op.
Ld.
EW
Score
EW
MP
EW
%
Pair# East-West
Jill Raphael &
Howard Raphael
X2N88 3.501003♥︎w–1♦︎6 0.5013X3EGaye Ballantyne &
Judy Day
Joan Christensen &
Eiler Eis
X3N88 3.501004♥︎e–1♣︎K 0.5013X5EJill Price &
Barbara Spitz
Diane O Connor &
Valerie Young
X4N50 2.002♦︎w+1♠︎4110 2.0050X2EDoug Stewart &
Louise Forsyth
Zdenka Buric &
Marcia Smith
X5N25 1.003♥︎e=♣︎K140 3.0075X4ELea Stanlake &
Lynne Pomfret
Niamh Kelly &
Donna Bridgeman
X6N0 0.004♥︎e=♠︎7620 4.00100X6EDavid Stokes &
Doug MacDougall
Section A Scores (two weeks ago)
ContractLeadResultN-S ScoreE-W Score
4♥︎eK♣︎-2 200
3♥︎e7♠︎-1 100
3♥︎e4♥︎-1 100
3♥︎eA♣︎-1 100
3♦︎w6♦︎+1 130
3♥︎eA♠︎= 140
When we count our points after picking up our cards, we usually count high-card points only, thinking about the common goals: 25 or 26 combined for a game, 33 for a slam. But during the auction, the value of a hand can go up or down based on the bids partner and opponents make. Here West opens the 16-count with 1♦︎, but when East responds 1♥︎, West re-evaluates on the basis of a heart fit, adding three points for the singleton club and one or two for the quality of West's trumps. With these extras it is clear that West must jump to 4♥︎, for even opposte a minimum this should make. Section A players seem to have played it poorly, for ten tricks are there once two diamonds and a spade are lost: crossruff!
#16 N NORTH       Jan. 19, 2026
♠︎ J94Dealer: W
♥︎ T94 EW Vul
D WEST      ♦︎ 6V  EAST      
♠︎Q8♣︎ J98432♠︎K632
♥︎AQJ3♥︎K875
♦︎KT8752N SOUTH       ♦︎J4
♣︎A♠︎AT75♣︎T76
2♥︎625
16HCP7♦︎AQ936FRK1
15♣︎KQ51
Tricks Available (best play by both sides)
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
by
N
66339by
E
6610104
by
S
67339by
W
6610104
Board 17 Results
North-South Pair#NS
%
NS
MP
NS
Score
Contract
& Result
Op.
Ld.
EW
Score
EW
MP
EW
%
Pair# East-West
Jill Raphael &
Howard Raphael
X2N100 4.001002NTe–2♣︎K 0.000X3EGaye Ballantyne &
Judy Day
Zdenka Buric &
Marcia Smith
X5N75 3.003♣︎n–1♠︎A50 1.0025X4ELea Stanlake &
Lynne Pomfret
Joan Christensen &
Eiler Eis
X3N50 2.002♦︎e=♣︎K90 2.0050X5EJill Price &
Barbara Spitz
Niamh Kelly &
Donna Bridgeman
X6N25 1.003♣︎n–2♠︎A100 3.0075X6EDavid Stokes &
Doug MacDougall
Diane O Connor &
Valerie Young
X4N0 0.002NTe+2♣︎7180 4.00100X2EDoug Stewart &
Louise Forsyth
Section A Scores (two weeks ago)
ContractLeadResultN-S ScoreE-W Score
2♦︎e7♣︎-1 50
3♣︎nA♠︎-1 50
2♣︎nA♣︎-1 50
3♣︎n*A♠︎-1 100
3♦︎eK♣︎+1 130
2♥︎s6♠︎-3 150
North opens 1♣︎ and East overcalls 1NT. South and West pass and North tries 2♣︎. East bids 2♦︎ to show a diamond suit (most likely five of them, although six or even seven is possible for a 1NT opener), and South doubles to indicate a desire to compete. West realizes that North will likely bid 3♣︎ and decides to make North's choice more difficult, bidding 3♦︎. North is not going to the four level, so 3♦︎ becomes the contract, and South leads the K♣︎. East ducks the first round and wins the second club, then plays the A♠︎ and another spade, finessing the jack. The K♠︎ allows East to pitch the third club from hand and work on trumps, eventually making nine tricks.
#17 D NORTH       Jan. 19, 2026
♠︎ 954Dealer: N
♥︎ A None Vul
N WEST      ♦︎ KQ9N  EAST      
♠︎KJ86♣︎ QJ8642♠︎A3
♥︎KT75♥︎Q96
♦︎532N SOUTH       ♦︎AJT87
♣︎95♠︎QT72♣︎AT3
12♥︎J84325
7HCP15♦︎641FRK2
6♣︎K73
Tricks Available (best play by both sides)
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
by
N
54437by
E
79996
by
S
54437by
W
79996
Board 18 Results
North-South Pair#NS
%
NS
MP
NS
Score
Contract
& Result
Op.
Ld.
EW
Score
EW
MP
EW
%
Pair# East-West
Jill Raphael &
Howard Raphael
X2N88 3.501703♠︎n+1♣︎K 0.5013X3EGaye Ballantyne &
Judy Day
Joan Christensen &
Eiler Eis
X3N88 3.501703♠︎n+1♣︎A 0.5013X5EJill Price &
Barbara Spitz
Diane O Connor &
Valerie Young
X4N50 2.001403♠︎n=♣︎K 2.0050X2EDoug Stewart &
Louise Forsyth
Niamh Kelly &
Donna Bridgeman
X6N13 0.503♠︎n–2♠︎2200 3.5088X6EDavid Stokes &
Doug MacDougall
Zdenka Buric &
Marcia Smith
X5N13 0.504♠︎n–2♥︎3200 3.5088X4ELea Stanlake &
Lynne Pomfret
Section A Scores (two weeks ago)
ContractLeadResultN-S ScoreE-W Score
5♥︎e*6♠︎-3 500
3♠︎nA♣︎= 140
2♠︎nA♣︎= 110
4♥︎wK♠︎-2 100
3♠︎nK♣︎-1 100
4♠︎nA♣︎-1 100
East opens 1♥︎ and South passes. West responds 2♣︎, and North pre-empts to 3♠︎. East and South pass and West guesses to try 4♥︎. All pass and South leads the 6♠︎. East wins in dummy and tries to run the J♥︎, but South wins the Q♥︎ and switches to a diamond. North wins the ace, cashes the Q♠︎, and forces East to ruff the J♠︎. East better not ruff with a small trump or South will overruff with the 4♥︎! Poor East probably has a club to lose in the end for down two. North-South can actually make 3♠︎ for 140, so down two for -100 is not going to score as badly as poor East thinks after struggling for thirteen tricks.
#18 V NORTH       Jan. 19, 2026
♠︎ KQJ9873Dealer: E
♥︎ 8 NS Vul
N WEST      ♦︎ A97D  EAST      
♠︎A42♣︎ 62♠︎T5
♥︎J96♥︎KT732
♦︎KQ8V SOUTH       ♦︎J43
♣︎T954♠︎6♣︎AK7
10♥︎AQ547
10HCP11♦︎T6520FRK2
9♣︎QJ833
Tricks Available (best play by both sides)
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
by
N
69566by
E
44866
by
S
69566by
W
44866

Work In Progress! This HTML page with results combines the ACBLscore results, the BridgeMate data, and the actual cards in each hand to make a page that displays nicely on most screens. I'll continue to develop it as I hear about problems from people. So far I have only really had time to test it on the large monitor I have at home. I've done a little bit of work in making it fit on my iPhone 15 screen (turned sideways), but the typical cellphone screen is not wide enough to display the hands alongside the results, so it relocates the hands below the results and you may need to scroll down a bit. The key is in the tabs at the top, which mean you don't need to scroll to get from results to Board 32! Just click or tap on what you want to see next!

Two things that may help: If your browser program is old, some of the tech in this page might not work 100%: the system of tabs at the top of the page requires a recent version. You really aren't doing your computer many favours if you avoid requests to upgrade the programs you use most often, like browsers. If the page works but there are large areas of a monitor unused, you might be able to make it more readable by adjusting the size of things with CTRL + (plus key), which upsizes text and other screen elements a bit. CTRL + (minus key) also works if you go too far, and CTRL + (zero) resets to the default. (This doesn't work on cellphone screens.)

How is a pair's matchpoint score on a board calculated? Your raw score is compared one by one with all of the other raw scores on the board made by pairs sitting in your direction. You get one matchpoint for each score you beat, and a half-point for each score that is the same as yours. The top score on a board is one less than the number of times it is played. If the board was not played as many times as other boards for some reason, the scores may be factored up to compensate, so that each board has the same top score.

How is a pair's total score calculated? The scoring program first checks all boards to see how many times they have been played. Usually this will be the same for all boards, but if there is a sitout or a glitch of some sort in the movement, or an artificially assigned score due to an irregularity, the scoring program must first FACTOR scores on boards played fewer times, so that the top score on every board is the same. Once that is done, the scoring program also checks to see that each pair played the same number of boards: some may have sat out and missed a round: these pairs will have their total matchpoints FACTORED so that they get matchpoints for the boards they missed, based on their percentage on the boards they did play. The total of all this summing and factoring is your final score.

How does this factoring work exactly? There are actually two types of factoring: the most common is to factor a pair's score that has not played as many boards as the other pairs. Their sum of matchpoints on the boards they played, is divided by the number of boards they played, and then multiplied by the number of boards most pairs played. The other type is covered in the next question.

I have the best score on a board but got slightly fewer matchpoints than tops on other boards, why is that? This is the other type of factoring, which happens when a board is played fewer times than other boards for some reason. Maybe a pair didn't get to it, or there was a artificial score assigned after an irregularity. Factoring a board has to take into account the small chance that, had it been played the correct number of times, the extra plays might have produced a score that is better than the current top, or lower than the current bottom. To do so, the ACBL and the World Bridge Federation use the Neuberg formula, which you can read about on Wikipedia if you want the complete details. It has its detractors, but is sort of like Winston Churchill's ranking of democracy as the second-worst system of government ... all the others being tied for first!

HCP and FRK, what on earth are they? HCP stands for highcard points, and the four numbers surrounding it show how many points each player has in a hand. The colour behind the word "HCP" is gray when the 40 points are evenly distributed between North-South and East-West, but turns more and more orange (North-South) or purple (East-West) if one side has a majority. FRK stands for Freakness, a way to describe just how freaky a hand's distribution is, on a scale from 0-20, with average for a hand being just slightly less than 3, and the average for a full deal, the sum of the freakness ratings of the four hands, is about 11.93 on average. A hand gets one freakness point for each card in a suit beyond the fourth, or less than three; plus a bonus if the hand contains at least one void (2 points) or at least one singleton but no void (1 point). The background colour behind the "FRK" shows whether the deal is hot (red), average (gray), or cold (blue) in terms of Freakness! Freakness was created by bridge expert Richard Pavlicek and searching for "pavlicek freakness" will get you quickly to his article on the subject.

What are "tricks available" and how are they calculated? Computers these days can analyze all the possible legal play lines on a deal, given a trump suit (or notrump) and a declarer, and sort all of these lines into successes and failures to come up with an optimum line of play that perfect defenders and a perfect declarer would take. The result of this line of play is the "tricks available" and is sometimes unrealistic, requiring opening leads that few if any would find, or declarer taking only the finesses that work and dropping offside singleton honours where possible. You will very quickly see from the results which deals have unrealistic "tricks available" expectations, and it is often a fun exercise to work out how you can make that many tricks. But for most deals, it is a fairly good guide as to how high a pair should bid.

Why are the masterpoints not the same as what is on ACBL Live for Clubs? This is in my view an own goal by ACBL: they have new rules for club game masterpoints but are not willing to expend the time to upgrade ACBLscore to show the masterpoints under the new rules. Luckily, most masterpoint awards actually get bigger when they go through the "engine" and are reposted on Live. The main effect is to give more masterpoints to games where the non-sitting out pairs play more boards. The problem is that the masterpoint awards that come out of ACBLscore, before being posted online, are not what you eventually get.

How can I contact McBruce to tell him what's not working for me? By e-mail: ooga@shaw.ca