VanLawn Section X, Monday Evening, February 16, 2026

No overalls in today's game.

Results for Section X, North-South
Pair#PercentScoreRankMPtsPlayers
X1N 60.00% 36.0010.36Joan Christensen - Carol Linda Ward
X5N 57.50% 34.5020.25Jill Price - Barbara Spitz
X4N 53.33% 32.00Alan Atkins - Valerie Young
X3N 52.50% 31.50Vicki Torbett - Niamh Kelly
X6N 39.17% 23.50Ron Rogers - Patsy Rogers
X2N 37.50% 22.50Eiler Eis - Bob Hodgkinson
North-South had 53.96% of the highcard points in today's deals.
The average freakness rating of today's deals (measuring the amount of distribution in the dealset as a whole) was 10.33, a bit below the average of about 11.93.
Results for Section X, East-West
Pair#PercentScoreRankMPtsPlayers
X4E 66.67% 40.0010.36Scott Turner - Doug MacDougall
X5E 58.33% 35.0020.25Zdenka Buric - Marcia Smith
X3E 53.33% 32.00Francesco L Piccone - M Piccone
X1E 46.67% 28.00Curtis Ballard - Elizabeth Ballard
X2E 38.33% 23.00Andrew Mason - Jacquie Brown
X6E 36.67% 22.00Lesley MacKay - Judy Day
North-South had 53.96% of the highcard points in today's deals.
The average freakness rating of today's deals (measuring the amount of distribution in the dealset as a whole) was 10.33, a bit below the average of about 11.93.
Board 1 Results
North-South Pair#NS
%
NS
MP
NS
Score
Contract
& Result
Op.
Ld.
EW
Score
EW
MP
EW
%
Pair# East-West
Joan Christensen &
Carol Linda Ward
X1N88 3.504804♥︎n+2♦︎Q 0.5013X1ECurtis Ballard &
Elizabeth Ballard
Vicki Torbett &
Niamh Kelly
X3N88 3.504804♥︎s+2♣︎5 0.5013X4EScott Turner &
Doug MacDougall
Alan Atkins &
Valerie Young
X4N38 1.504504♥︎s+1♠︎J 2.5063X6ELesley MacKay &
Judy Day
Ron Rogers &
Patsy Rogers
X6N38 1.504504♥︎s+1♣︎5 2.5063X5EZdenka Buric &
Marcia Smith
Jill Price &
Barbara Spitz
X5N0 0.002303♥︎s+3♦︎A 4.00100X3EFrancesco L Piccone &
M Piccone
Section A Scores (two weeks ago)
ContractLeadResultN-S ScoreE-W Score
4♥︎nQ♦︎+2 480
4♥︎nQ♦︎+2 480
5♥︎nQ♦︎= 450
3♥︎nQ♦︎+3 230
North opens 1♣︎, East passes, South responds 1♥︎, and West makes a takeout double. North is going to raise, but how high? There are many methods for adjusting the highcard point system when a fit is found. All these extra bonuses usually apply only to the bidder who first discovers the fit, here, that is opener North. (If both add the bonus points you may get too high!) North has 16 points, but short suits count 1-3-5 for doubletons, singletons, and voids when a fit is found, and trump honours are worth extra points as well. This gets North up to 20 or so and it is an easy raise to 4♥︎, which makes 12 tricks when clubs provide spade discards. Maybe South should bid on....
#1 D NORTH       Feb. 16, 2026
♠︎ A9Dealer: N
♥︎ KQJ6 None Vul
N WEST      ♦︎ 7N  EAST      
♠︎KJ642♣︎ KQJ976♠︎Q7
♥︎T85♥︎93
♦︎AT83N SOUTH       ♦︎QJ9654
♣︎5♠︎T853♣︎T84
16♥︎A7426
8HCP5♦︎K24FRK4
11♣︎A321
Tricks Available (best play by both sides)
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
by
N
7612411by
E
26192
by
S
11512411by
W
26192
Board 2 Results
North-South Pair#NS
%
NS
MP
NS
Score
Contract
& Result
Op.
Ld.
EW
Score
EW
MP
EW
%
Pair# East-West
Alan Atkins &
Valerie Young
X4N97 3.883♥︎e+2♣︎3200 0.123X6ELesley MacKay &
Judy Day
Joan Christensen &
Carol Linda Ward
X1N34 1.384♥︎e+1♦︎2450 2.6266X1ECurtis Ballard &
Elizabeth Ballard
Vicki Torbett &
Niamh Kelly
X3N34 1.384♥︎e+1♣︎5450 2.6266X4EScott Turner &
Doug MacDougall
Jill Price &
Barbara Spitz
X5N34 1.384♥︎e+1♦︎2450 2.6266X3EFrancesco L Piccone &
M Piccone
Section A Scores (two weeks ago)
ContractLeadResultN-S ScoreE-W Score
2♥︎e7♣︎+3 200
4♣︎n9♠︎-3 300
4♥︎e5♣︎+1 450
4♥︎e4♠︎+1 450
East opens 2♥︎ as dealer and South passes. West is probably strong enough to raise to game, which makes for an easy 450: a diamond goes on the spades and the K♥︎ is onside. The computer program JACK found a way to get an even higher East-West score: West PASSED the 2♥︎ call, luring North into competing with a 2NT call. East was alert enough not to lead hearts, finding a spade lead, and West grabbed three spades before switching to a heart for six more tricks. Two diamonds followed and declarer was held to only two tricks and -600! The West pass is a bit whacky, but one thing West must avoid is the urge to bid 2♠︎, concealing the nine-card heart fit.
#2 V NORTH       Feb. 16, 2026
♠︎ T86Dealer: E
♥︎ KT NS Vul
N WEST      ♦︎ Q87D  EAST      
♠︎AKQ32♣︎ AKQJ4♠︎9
♥︎982♥︎AQ7654
♦︎K95V SOUTH       ♦︎AT3
♣︎T2♠︎J754♣︎986
15♥︎J32
12HCP10♦︎J6422FRK5
3♣︎7531
Tricks Available (best play by both sides)
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
by
N
23145by
E
8101198
by
S
13145by
W
8101198
Board 3 Results
North-South Pair#NS
%
NS
MP
NS
Score
Contract
& Result
Op.
Ld.
EW
Score
EW
MP
EW
%
Pair# East-West
Alan Atkins &
Valerie Young
X4N100 4.002004♥︎e–2♦︎3 0.000X6ELesley MacKay &
Judy Day
Ron Rogers &
Patsy Rogers
X6N63 2.501003NTw–1♦︎2 1.5038X5EZdenka Buric &
Marcia Smith
Jill Price &
Barbara Spitz
X5N63 2.501004♥︎e–1♦︎8 1.5038X3EFrancesco L Piccone &
M Piccone
Joan Christensen &
Carol Linda Ward
X1N25 1.003♣︎e=♠︎9110 3.0075X1ECurtis Ballard &
Elizabeth Ballard
Vicki Torbett &
Niamh Kelly
X3N0 0.003♥︎e=♦︎4140 4.00100X4EScott Turner &
Doug MacDougall
Section A Scores (two weeks ago)
ContractLeadResultN-S ScoreE-W Score
3♣︎w3♠︎+1 130
1♥︎e6♦︎+2 140
2♣︎e8♦︎+3 150
1Nw7♠︎+2 150
South and West pass and North opens 1♦︎. East overcalls 1♥︎ and South tosses in a 1♠︎ call, taking note of the vulnerability and the shortness in the opponents' suit to scrape up a bid at all. West has no fit for hearts and passes, and North raises to 2♠︎. East and South pass and so would many West players, but not this West. An average hand opposite an overcall must have some play for something, so this West competes to 2NT. East tries 3♣︎, and that becomes the final contact, a great success for East-West, making four for 130. Had West passed out 2♠︎, South would have made seven tricks and the cost to East-West would be only 50, likely a top for North-South.
#3 N NORTH       Feb. 16, 2026
♠︎ 763Dealer: S
♥︎ J754 EW Vul
V WEST      ♦︎ AKT2V  EAST      
♠︎AQ2♣︎ A7♠︎85
♥︎86♥︎AKQT9
♦︎Q75D SOUTH       ♦︎J9
♣︎QT642♠︎KJT94♣︎KJ98
12♥︎321
10HCP14♦︎86432FRK3
4♣︎533
Tricks Available (best play by both sides)
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
by
N
37363by
E
9610710
by
S
37363by
W
9610710
Board 4 Results
North-South Pair#NS
%
NS
MP
NS
Score
Contract
& Result
Op.
Ld.
EW
Score
EW
MP
EW
%
Pair# East-West
Alan Atkins &
Valerie Young
X4N100 4.003003♥︎e–3♣︎3 0.000X5EZdenka Buric &
Marcia Smith
Jill Price &
Barbara Spitz
X5N75 3.002002♥︎e–2♣︎9 1.0025X1ECurtis Ballard &
Elizabeth Ballard
Joan Christensen &
Carol Linda Ward
X1N50 2.001002♥︎w–1♣︎K 2.0050X6ELesley MacKay &
Judy Day
Eiler Eis &
Bob Hodgkinson
X2N25 1.00902♣︎n=♦︎3 3.0075X2EAndrew Mason &
Jacquie Brown
Ron Rogers &
Patsy Rogers
X6N0 0.00701♣︎n=♦︎Q 4.00100X4EScott Turner &
Doug MacDougall
Section A Scores (two weeks ago)
ContractLeadResultN-S ScoreE-W Score
2♥︎wK♣︎-1 100
2♥︎wK♣︎-1 100
2♦︎n9♠︎-1 100
3♣︎nQ♦︎-2 200
West's 1♦︎ opener gives North a problem. 1NT without a heart stopper or even a doubleton heart is not a good option, and overcalling 2♣︎ seems like an underbid with a hand this strong. North decides to double and then bid clubs later to show a hand too strong to overcall 2♣︎. However, East responds 1♥︎, South passes and West raises to 2♥︎, and North has another problem, since to bid clubs requires the 3-level, opposite a partner who may have nothing. But with seven tricks in hand, surely it is a reasonable shot to take. Not this time. Partner provides nothing useful and North goes two down. Unlucky: almost any honour other than the Q♥︎ would give North a chance to escape for down one only.
#4 V NORTH       Feb. 16, 2026
♠︎ A65Dealer: W
♥︎ T All Vul
D WEST      ♦︎ AK73V  EAST      
♠︎QJ♣︎ KQJT2♠︎K974
♥︎AJ65♥︎K743
♦︎T984V SOUTH       ♦︎QJ
♣︎A76♠︎T832♣︎854
17♥︎Q9824
12HCP9♦︎6521FRK1
2♣︎931
Tricks Available (best play by both sides)
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
by
N
77577by
E
65766
by
S
77577by
W
65766
Board 5 Results
North-South Pair#NS
%
NS
MP
NS
Score
Contract
& Result
Op.
Ld.
EW
Score
EW
MP
EW
%
Pair# East-West
Joan Christensen &
Carol Linda Ward
X1N88 3.506205♣︎n+1♥︎6 0.5013X6ELesley MacKay &
Judy Day
Jill Price &
Barbara Spitz
X5N88 3.506205♣︎n+1♥︎9 0.5013X1ECurtis Ballard &
Elizabeth Ballard
Eiler Eis &
Bob Hodgkinson
X2N38 1.501703♣︎n+3♠︎4 2.5063X2EAndrew Mason &
Jacquie Brown
Alan Atkins &
Valerie Young
X4N38 1.501703♣︎n+3♣︎3 2.5063X5EZdenka Buric &
Marcia Smith
Ron Rogers &
Patsy Rogers
X6N0 0.002♦︎s–1♥︎A100 4.00100X4EScott Turner &
Doug MacDougall
Section A Scores (two weeks ago)
ContractLeadResultN-S ScoreE-W Score
6♣︎n8♠︎= 1370
5♣︎n6♥︎+1 620
5♣︎n9♥︎+1 620
3Nn*9♥︎-1 200
The JACK route to 6♣︎ relied on a lot of inference: North opens 1♣︎, East passes and South responds 1♦︎. West overcalls 1♥︎ and North passes: a double would show more than a mere 14, and rebidding clubs promises a six-card suit. This is a tough standard to maintain; I usually bid 2♣︎ treating the good five-card suit as a six. East passes and South bids ... 4♥︎? What's that? 2♥︎ (West's suit) would show a good hand, 3♥︎ would ask for a stopper in hearts for 3NT. The double jump must show a heart control and set the search for slam in motion. North complies with a 4♠︎ cuebid and South bids 5♣︎. If South can bid this much without a club honour, thinks North, surely AKQJx is enough to push on! And it is!
#5 D NORTH       Feb. 16, 2026
♠︎ A6Dealer: N
♥︎ T854 NS Vul
N WEST      ♦︎ 32N  EAST      
♠︎97♣︎ AKQJ5♠︎T85432
♥︎AKQJ7♥︎962
♦︎J874V SOUTH       ♦︎T95
♣︎73♠︎KQJ♣︎6
14♥︎33
11HCP0♦︎AKQ63FRK5
15♣︎T98424
Tricks Available (best play by both sides)
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
by
N
887812by
E
25621
by
S
887812by
W
25621
Board 6 Results
North-South Pair#NS
%
NS
MP
NS
Score
Contract
& Result
Op.
Ld.
EW
Score
EW
MP
EW
%
Pair# East-West
Jill Price &
Barbara Spitz
X5N100 4.002004♥︎w–2♠︎A 0.000X1ECurtis Ballard &
Elizabeth Ballard
Joan Christensen &
Carol Linda Ward
X1N63 2.501003♥︎w–1♠︎A 1.5038X6ELesley MacKay &
Judy Day
Alan Atkins &
Valerie Young
X4N63 2.501004♥︎w–1♦︎A 1.5038X5EZdenka Buric &
Marcia Smith
Eiler Eis &
Bob Hodgkinson
X2N25 1.004♠︎n–1♦︎K50 3.0075X2EAndrew Mason &
Jacquie Brown
Ron Rogers &
Patsy Rogers
X6N0 0.002♦︎e+4♠︎9170 4.00100X4EScott Turner &
Doug MacDougall
Section A Scores (two weeks ago)
ContractLeadResultN-S ScoreE-W Score
3♠︎n4♥︎-2 100
4♦︎e2♠︎+2 170
3♠︎s*K♣︎-2 300
4♠︎n*K♦︎-3 500
East opens 1♦︎ and South passes. West responds 1♥︎ and North enters the auction with a 1♠︎ overcall. This common situation, where there is an overcall after a major suit response, makes it difficult for opener to discover if three-card support is enough, so a new convention, the Support Double, has become popular. East doubles to show three-card support for West's hearts. South passes and West bids 2♦︎: no heart fit, but I can support diamonds. North has enough for 2♠︎, East raises to 3♦︎, South competes to 3♠︎, and West bids 4♦︎. North passes and East decides that the spade void is a real asset and bids 5♦︎. Thus 21 combined highcard points bid and make an eleven trick game!
#6 N NORTH       Feb. 16, 2026
♠︎ AKJT43Dealer: E
♥︎ T5 EW Vul
V WEST      ♦︎ A5D  EAST      
♠︎875♣︎ Q42♠︎
♥︎AJ87♥︎K94
♦︎T863N SOUTH       ♦︎KQ972
♣︎KJ♠︎Q962♣︎AT965
14♥︎Q6324
9HCP12♦︎J41FRK7
5♣︎8731
Tricks Available (best play by both sides)
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
by
N
47211by
E
66101212
by
S
57211by
W
66101212
Board 7 Results
North-South Pair#NS
%
NS
MP
NS
Score
Contract
& Result
Op.
Ld.
EW
Score
EW
MP
EW
%
Pair# East-West
Vicki Torbett &
Niamh Kelly
X3N75 3.006504♥︎n+1♠︎K 1.0025X3EFrancesco L Piccone &
M Piccone
Jill Price &
Barbara Spitz
X5N75 3.006504♥︎n+1♠︎J 1.0025X6ELesley MacKay &
Judy Day
Ron Rogers &
Patsy Rogers
X6N75 3.006504♥︎n+1♠︎K 1.0025X2EAndrew Mason &
Jacquie Brown
Joan Christensen &
Carol Linda Ward
X1N25 1.001702♥︎s+2♠︎T 3.0075X5EZdenka Buric &
Marcia Smith
Eiler Eis &
Bob Hodgkinson
X2N0 0.004NTs–3♠︎A300 4.00100X1ECurtis Ballard &
Elizabeth Ballard
Section A Scores (two weeks ago)
ContractLeadResultN-S ScoreE-W Score
4♥︎sJ♦︎+2 680
5♥︎n4♠︎= 650
4♥︎nA♠︎+1 650
3♠︎eA♣︎-1 100
Who needs 25 or 26 combined highcard points for game when you have a big fit? South opens 1♦︎ and West overcalls 1♠︎. North passes and East raises to 4♠︎. East's eight points combine with a singleton heart for three more, and although the K♦︎ may be "in the lock" based on South's 1♦︎ opener, the extra trumps and honours in the suit are worth a few more points. But after South and West pass, North comes to life with 5♥︎! North reasons that when one side has a fit, the other side usually does as well. 5♥︎ is cold for 650 and even doubling 4♠︎ would only net 500. North's first round pass may look a bit weird, but bidding or doubling would show a stronger hand: pass and wait worked!
#7 V NORTH       Feb. 16, 2026
♠︎ 2Dealer: S
♥︎ J985432 All Vul
V WEST      ♦︎ 4V  EAST      
♠︎AQT85♣︎ KQ87♠︎KJ943
♥︎AT♥︎7
♦︎J2D SOUTH       ♦︎K753
♣︎9632♠︎76♣︎J54
6♥︎KQ68
11HCP8♦︎AQT9863FRK4
15♣︎AT4
Tricks Available (best play by both sides)
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
by
N
751197by
E
68146
by
S
751197by
W
68146
Board 8 Results
North-South Pair#NS
%
NS
MP
NS
Score
Contract
& Result
Op.
Ld.
EW
Score
EW
MP
EW
%
Pair# East-West
Eiler Eis &
Bob Hodgkinson
X2N75 3.004005♦︎s=♥︎A 1.0025X1ECurtis Ballard &
Elizabeth Ballard
Vicki Torbett &
Niamh Kelly
X3N75 3.004005♦︎s=♠︎A 1.0025X3EFrancesco L Piccone &
M Piccone
Jill Price &
Barbara Spitz
X5N75 3.004005♦︎s=♥︎A 1.0025X6ELesley MacKay &
Judy Day
Ron Rogers &
Patsy Rogers
X6N13 0.501503♦︎s+2♣︎T 3.5088X2EAndrew Mason &
Jacquie Brown
Joan Christensen &
Carol Linda Ward
X1N13 0.501504♦︎s+1♣︎6 3.5088X5EZdenka Buric &
Marcia Smith
Section A Scores (two weeks ago)
ContractLeadResultN-S ScoreE-W Score
5♦︎s*A♠︎= 550
5♦︎sT♣︎= 400
3♦︎sA♠︎+2 150
4♥︎s6♣︎-5 250
Three passes to South's 1♦︎ opener, and West overcalls 1♠︎. North passes and East bids 2♣︎. South doubles for takeout but West bids 3♣︎, passed by North and East. South now cuebids 3♠︎ to demand some response from North, showing a very strong hand with diamonds and hearts. North bids 4♦︎ and South raises to game. Can 5♦︎ be beaten? The computer thinks it can, but to beat 5♦︎ the defenders need the A♠︎ and two heart tricks: they must capture one of South's heart honours with the ace and also win the fourth round. To do so, a trump must be led, and a second trump led by West after winning the A♥︎, to prevent South ruffing the fourth heart in dummy. Otherwise, 5♦︎ will make.
#8 N NORTH       Feb. 16, 2026
♠︎ T9843Dealer: W
♥︎ Q3 None Vul
D WEST      ♦︎ 84N  EAST      
♠︎A7652♣︎ K432♠︎QJ
♥︎AT6♥︎9842
♦︎92N SOUTH       ♦︎5
♣︎T96♠︎K♣︎AQJ875
5♥︎KJ753
8HCP10♦︎AKQJT7632FRK6
17♣︎11
Tricks Available (best play by both sides)
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
by
N
445103by
E
587210
by
S
444103by
W
587210
Board 9 Results
North-South Pair#NS
%
NS
MP
NS
Score
Contract
& Result
Op.
Ld.
EW
Score
EW
MP
EW
%
Pair# East-West
Joan Christensen &
Carol Linda Ward
X1N100 4.004303NTs+1♥︎2 0.000X5EZdenka Buric &
Marcia Smith
Vicki Torbett &
Niamh Kelly
X3N75 3.004003NTs=♦︎4 1.0025X3EFrancesco L Piccone &
M Piccone
Jill Price &
Barbara Spitz
X5N50 2.002002♥︎w–2♣︎7 2.0050X6ELesley MacKay &
Judy Day
Ron Rogers &
Patsy Rogers
X6N25 1.001502NTs+1♥︎2 3.0075X2EAndrew Mason &
Jacquie Brown
Eiler Eis &
Bob Hodgkinson
X2N0 0.001302♣︎s+2♣︎K 4.00100X1ECurtis Ballard &
Elizabeth Ballard
Section A Scores (two weeks ago)
ContractLeadResultN-S ScoreE-W Score
3Ns2♥︎= 400
3Ns2♥︎= 400
2Ns7♥︎+1 150
3Ns2♥︎-1 50
The Earl of Yarborough in the 19th century would offer 1000-1 on a pound bet against picking up a hand with no honours (ten or higher) in whist, the predecessor game of bridge. The real odds are about 1827-1. Now the term Yarborough is commonly heard to describe a zero point hand like North's, but the old Earl would not pay up upon seeing the T♠︎. North passes and South opens 2♣︎, rebidding 3NT after North's forced 2♦︎ call. Do not even consider passing 2♣︎ with this hand....unless you want a new partner. If West can resist leading away from a major suit king, it should go down, but West is going to be on lead many times and may give in to the temptation....
#9 D NORTH       Feb. 16, 2026
♠︎ T7Dealer: N
♥︎ 964 EW Vul
V WEST      ♦︎ 96V  EAST      
♠︎K543♣︎ 876543♠︎986
♥︎K872♥︎J53
♦︎J54N SOUTH       ♦︎KT32
♣︎KQ♠︎AQJ2♣︎T92
0♥︎AQT4
12HCP4♦︎AQ871FRK0
24♣︎AJ1
Tricks Available (best play by both sides)
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
by
N
88889by
E
55453
by
S
889810by
W
54453
Board 10 Results
North-South Pair#NS
%
NS
MP
NS
Score
Contract
& Result
Op.
Ld.
EW
Score
EW
MP
EW
%
Pair# East-West
Vicki Torbett &
Niamh Kelly
X3N88 3.503♦︎s–1♣︎5100 0.5013X2EAndrew Mason &
Jacquie Brown
Ron Rogers &
Patsy Rogers
X6N88 3.503♦︎s–1♣︎5100 0.5013X1ECurtis Ballard &
Elizabeth Ballard
Joan Christensen &
Carol Linda Ward
X1N50 2.002♠︎w=♦︎2110 2.0050X3EFrancesco L Piccone &
M Piccone
Eiler Eis &
Bob Hodgkinson
X2N25 1.002♠︎w+1♥︎T140 3.0075X6ELesley MacKay &
Judy Day
Alan Atkins &
Valerie Young
X4N0 0.004♠︎w=♣︎K620 4.00100X4EScott Turner &
Doug MacDougall
Section A Scores (two weeks ago)
ContractLeadResultN-S ScoreE-W Score
2♠︎wK♣︎+1 140
2♠︎wT♥︎+1 140
3♠︎w2♦︎= 140
2♠︎w9♥︎+2 170
Every table should get to a spade partscore by West and once in West will take a trump finesse, running the ten to South's king. It's what to do on the second round that is interesting: West leads a second trump and North follows with the nine. Play the ace hoping for ♠︎KQ doubleton? Or finesse again? You may think it is a coin flip, but it is actually closer to 2:1 odds that South has a singleton king of spades. The reason, in a nutshell, is that if South had both honours he could have won the first trick with the queen or the king. Wikipedia has a good article on this, called The Principle of Restricted Choice. It continues to confuse many to this day....
#10 V NORTH       Feb. 16, 2026
♠︎ Q93Dealer: E
♥︎ T98 All Vul
V WEST      ♦︎ 9752D  EAST      
♠︎T8652♣︎ KQ2♠︎AJ74
♥︎AJ54♥︎K76
♦︎J43V SOUTH       ♦︎A8
♣︎5♠︎K♣︎JT76
7♥︎Q320
6HCP13♦︎KQT64FRK1
14♣︎A98434
Tricks Available (best play by both sides)
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
by
N
43467by
E
610966
by
S
43467by
W
610956
Board 11 Results
North-South Pair#NS
%
NS
MP
NS
Score
Contract
& Result
Op.
Ld.
EW
Score
EW
MP
EW
%
Pair# East-West
Eiler Eis &
Bob Hodgkinson
X2N100 4.0010206NTn+1♥︎J 0.000X6ELesley MacKay &
Judy Day
Vicki Torbett &
Niamh Kelly
X3N75 3.004904NTs+2♣︎4 1.0025X2EAndrew Mason &
Jacquie Brown
Joan Christensen &
Carol Linda Ward
X1N38 1.504003NTs=♣︎3 2.5063X3EFrancesco L Piccone &
M Piccone
Ron Rogers &
Patsy Rogers
X6N38 1.504003NTs=♣︎4 2.5063X1ECurtis Ballard &
Elizabeth Ballard
Alan Atkins &
Valerie Young
X4N0 0.006♠︎s–1♥︎250 4.00100X4EScott Turner &
Doug MacDougall
Section A Scores (two weeks ago)
ContractLeadResultN-S ScoreE-W Score
6Ns4♣︎+1 1020
6NsT♣︎+1 1020
6Ns4♣︎= 990
6♠︎sT♣︎= 980
North counts 17 highcard points and looks across to see South open 1NT as dealer, and realizes the pair is in the slam zone. Priorities for North will be to find a major suit fit if there is one, and to ensure there are not two missing aces. North starts with 2♥︎, a transfer to spades. (Stayman followed by 2♠︎ if North rebids 2♥︎ is non-forcing.) Next, North bids 3♦︎, a second suit, and South bids 3♠︎, confirming a fit. 4NT reveals that South has two aces and 5NT tells North that South has only one king. 6♠︎ would be safest, but 6NT pays a bit more, so North chooses that one. With the K♠︎ onside, there are 13 easy tricks!
#11 N NORTH       Feb. 16, 2026
♠︎ AJT52Dealer: S
♥︎ AQ None Vul
N WEST      ♦︎ KJ52N  EAST      
♠︎K93♣︎ Q8♠︎84
♥︎52♥︎JT876
♦︎873D SOUTH       ♦︎96
♣︎T9643♠︎Q76♣︎KJ52
17♥︎K9433
3HCP5♦︎AQT42FRK3
15♣︎A71
Tricks Available (best play by both sides)
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
by
N
131311138by
E
00205
by
S
131310138by
W
00205
Board 12 Results
North-South Pair#NS
%
NS
MP
NS
Score
Contract
& Result
Op.
Ld.
EW
Score
EW
MP
EW
%
Pair# East-West
Vicki Torbett &
Niamh Kelly
X3N88 3.506003NTn=♥︎5 0.5013X2EAndrew Mason &
Jacquie Brown
Alan Atkins &
Valerie Young
X4N88 3.506005♦︎n=♥︎5 0.5013X4EScott Turner &
Doug MacDougall
Joan Christensen &
Carol Linda Ward
X1N50 2.001503♦︎n+2♠︎3 2.0050X3EFrancesco L Piccone &
M Piccone
Ron Rogers &
Patsy Rogers
X6N25 1.001303♦︎n+1♣︎9 3.0075X1ECurtis Ballard &
Elizabeth Ballard
Eiler Eis &
Bob Hodgkinson
X2N0 0.003NTs–2♠︎K200 4.00100X6ELesley MacKay &
Judy Day
Section A Scores (two weeks ago)
ContractLeadResultN-S ScoreE-W Score
3Nn7♣︎+1 630
4♥︎sK♠︎= 620
4♥︎sA♠︎= 620
3♦︎n2♠︎+2 150
It's only fair that I report on a hand where a convention fails, for none of them are perfect. West passes, North opens 1♦︎, East passes, and South responds 1♥︎. West overcalls 1♠︎ and North makes a Support Double, showing exactly three-card heart support. East passes and South cuebids 2♠︎, hoping to hear a notrump bid from North that will confirm a spade stopper, since the Support Double has shown that they have only a seven-card fit in hearts. North continues on to 3♥︎, denying a spade stopper, and South is stuck. 3NT will be defeated by spade leads, and 4♥︎ on a seven-card fit seems risky. South passes hoping a plus score will suffice, but 4♥︎ makes and 170 is a near-bottom.
#12 V NORTH       Feb. 16, 2026
♠︎ 964Dealer: W
♥︎ AKQ NS Vul
D WEST      ♦︎ 9874N  EAST      
♠︎AKT87♣︎ KJ3♠︎J53
♥︎74♥︎JT65
♦︎T65V SOUTH       ♦︎32
♣︎Q82♠︎Q2♣︎9765
13♥︎98320
9HCP2♦︎AKQJ2FRK1
16♣︎AT41
Tricks Available (best play by both sides)
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
by
N
8710119by
E
35323
by
S
8710119by
W
35323
Board 13 Results
North-South Pair#NS
%
NS
MP
NS
Score
Contract
& Result
Op.
Ld.
EW
Score
EW
MP
EW
%
Pair# East-West
Joan Christensen &
Carol Linda Ward
X1N100 4.001402♥︎s+1♠︎4 0.000X2EAndrew Mason &
Jacquie Brown
Jill Price &
Barbara Spitz
X5N75 3.001102♥︎s=♦︎2 1.0025X5EZdenka Buric &
Marcia Smith
Alan Atkins &
Valerie Young
X4N50 2.001♦︎e+1♣︎590 2.0050X3EFrancesco L Piccone &
M Piccone
Eiler Eis &
Bob Hodgkinson
X2N25 1.001NTn–1♦︎6100 3.0075X4EScott Turner &
Doug MacDougall
Vicki Torbett &
Niamh Kelly
X3N0 0.003NTn–3♦︎6300 4.00100X1ECurtis Ballard &
Elizabeth Ballard
Section A Scores (two weeks ago)
ContractLeadResultN-S ScoreE-W Score
2♠︎s3♠︎= 110
2♥︎s7♣︎= 110
1Nn6♦︎= 90
3♥︎sA♦︎-1 100
North opens 1♣︎, East overcalls 1♦︎, and South takes the opportunity to try a Negative Double, showing both majors. West passes and North rebids 1NT, denying a four-card major. East passes and South tries 2♣︎. South knows that North will have real clubs and not a short club, since short clubs are only opened when the opening bidder has four-card majors that cannot be opened. West now competes to 2♦︎, which is passed around to South, who bids 3♣︎. It makes, but the real opportunity was in doubling 2♦︎ for penalties, which might get North-South 200 or even 500. South did well to continue over 1NT, which makes only 90 while clubs makes 110 or even 130.
#13 D NORTH       Feb. 16, 2026
♠︎ Q85Dealer: N
♥︎ AK9 All Vul
V WEST      ♦︎ QT4V  EAST      
♠︎T43♣︎ KT92♠︎A97
♥︎T72♥︎Q63
♦︎A952V SOUTH       ♦︎J8763
♣︎Q87♠︎KJ62♣︎A6
14♥︎J8540
6HCP11♦︎K0FRK2
9♣︎J5433
Tricks Available (best play by both sides)
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
by
N
789710by
E
64463
by
S
78969by
W
64463
Board 14 Results
North-South Pair#NS
%
NS
MP
NS
Score
Contract
& Result
Op.
Ld.
EW
Score
EW
MP
EW
%
Pair# East-West
Joan Christensen &
Carol Linda Ward
X1N100 4.004504♥︎n+1♦︎A 0.000X2EAndrew Mason &
Jacquie Brown
Eiler Eis &
Bob Hodgkinson
X2N63 2.504204♥︎n=♦︎A 1.5038X4EScott Turner &
Doug MacDougall
Vicki Torbett &
Niamh Kelly
X3N63 2.504204♥︎n=♦︎A 1.5038X1ECurtis Ballard &
Elizabeth Ballard
Alan Atkins &
Valerie Young
X4N25 1.001403♥︎n=♣︎3 3.0075X3EFrancesco L Piccone &
M Piccone
Jill Price &
Barbara Spitz
X5N0 0.006♥︎*n–2♦︎A300 4.00100X5EZdenka Buric &
Marcia Smith
Section A Scores (two weeks ago)
ContractLeadResultN-S ScoreE-W Score
4♥︎nA♦︎= 420
2♥︎nA♦︎+2 170
2♥︎nA♦︎+2 170
2♥︎nK♦︎+2 170
East opens 1♦︎, and South overcalls 2♣︎. West passes, and North's hand demands action. Bidding a new suit after an overcall usually shows a six-card suit, so bidding 2♥︎ or (if you're not sure 2♥︎ is forcing) 3♥︎, is out. 4♥︎ is a wild shot that hopes for support from partner. 3NT is probably safer: Q854 is not the best stopper ever, but it seems unlikely that West will be able to win a trick and lead diamonds through. With the K♠︎ obviously onside (East cannot have an opener without it), North has two spades, five hearts, and three clubs for ten tricks. (Looks like Section A players thought 2♥︎ was forcing and discovered that it wasn't....)
#14 N NORTH       Feb. 16, 2026
♠︎ QJ7Dealer: E
♥︎ KQ976 None Vul
N WEST      ♦︎ Q854D  EAST      
♠︎65432♣︎ A♠︎K98
♥︎J532♥︎4
♦︎TN SOUTH       ♦︎AKJ97
♣︎T62♠︎AT♣︎J953
14♥︎AT84
1HCP12♦︎6324FRK4
13♣︎KQ8742
Tricks Available (best play by both sides)
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
by
N
1071089by
E
25253
by
S
1061088by
W
25253
Board 15 Results
North-South Pair#NS
%
NS
MP
NS
Score
Contract
& Result
Op.
Ld.
EW
Score
EW
MP
EW
%
Pair# East-West
Vicki Torbett &
Niamh Kelly
X3N100 4.00504♥︎e–1♣︎2 0.000X1ECurtis Ballard &
Elizabeth Ballard
Joan Christensen &
Carol Linda Ward
X1N75 3.003♥︎e=♠︎5140 1.0025X2EAndrew Mason &
Jacquie Brown
Jill Price &
Barbara Spitz
X5N50 2.004♥︎e=♦︎2420 2.0050X5EZdenka Buric &
Marcia Smith
Eiler Eis &
Bob Hodgkinson
X2N25 1.003NTe+1♠︎4430 3.0075X4EScott Turner &
Doug MacDougall
Alan Atkins &
Valerie Young
X4N0 0.003NTe+2♠︎4460 4.00100X3EFrancesco L Piccone &
M Piccone
Section A Scores (two weeks ago)
ContractLeadResultN-S ScoreE-W Score
4♥︎eK♠︎= 420
3Ne4♠︎+1 430
3Ne4♠︎+1 430
3Ne4♠︎+1 430
Three passes to East's 1NT opener. South passes and West makes a Stayman 2♣︎ call, asking about four-card major suits. North passes and East bids 2♥︎ (it is best to bid hearts with both majors). West raises to 3♥︎ as a game invite, and East decides his 16 is closer to a minimum than a maximum. There are 10 tricks available in hearts and notrump can, with best defense, be held to three, so our East-West pair is in the right strain, but should be in game. Both were pessimistic: West subtracted a point for flat distribution and East should have added one for the club doubleton. But don't forego Stayman because you are 4-3-3-3, as Section A seems to have. 4-4 major suit fits are worth finding.
#15 V NORTH       Feb. 16, 2026
♠︎ 32Dealer: S
♥︎ K6 NS Vul
N WEST      ♦︎ A763N  EAST      
♠︎A96♣︎ 87653♠︎JT87
♥︎QT54♥︎A982
♦︎QT4D SOUTH       ♦︎KJ5
♣︎JT4♠︎KQ54♣︎AK
7♥︎J733
9HCP16♦︎9820FRK1
8♣︎Q920
Tricks Available (best play by both sides)
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
by
N
43356by
E
991087
by
S
43356by
W
991087
Board 16 Results
North-South Pair#NS
%
NS
MP
NS
Score
Contract
& Result
Op.
Ld.
EW
Score
EW
MP
EW
%
Pair# East-West
Eiler Eis &
Bob Hodgkinson
X2N88 3.501102♥︎n=♦︎2 0.5013X3EFrancesco L Piccone &
M Piccone
Jill Price &
Barbara Spitz
X5N88 3.501102♥︎n=♦︎2 0.5013X4EScott Turner &
Doug MacDougall
Ron Rogers &
Patsy Rogers
X6N50 2.00801♥︎n=♣︎3 2.0050X6ELesley MacKay &
Judy Day
Alan Atkins &
Valerie Young
X4N25 1.002♥︎n–2♦︎J100 3.0075X2EAndrew Mason &
Jacquie Brown
Vicki Torbett &
Niamh Kelly
X3N0 0.003♥︎n–3♠︎T150 4.00100X5EZdenka Buric &
Marcia Smith
Section A Scores (two weeks ago)
ContractLeadResultN-S ScoreE-W Score
1♥︎n4♥︎+1 110
1♥︎n2♦︎= 80
2♥︎nJ♦︎-1 50
2♥︎nJ♦︎-1 50
Another one of these cursed hands (which surprisingly, are about 10% of deals) where neither side has an eight-card fit in any suit. Unusually for deals of this type, it settles into a makeable contract, as West opens 1♦︎, and North's 1♥︎ overcall is followed by three passes. North has three heart losers and should lose them as quickly as possible. North must also lose the A♣︎ and two spades, but makes the other seven tricks for a score of plus 80. Usually these no-fit deals end up in several different contracts from all points on the compass, all going down!
#16 N NORTH       Feb. 16, 2026
♠︎ Q5Dealer: W
♥︎ KQT632 EW Vul
D WEST      ♦︎ KV  EAST      
♠︎K92♣︎ KQ52♠︎AJT
♥︎AJ98♥︎754
♦︎Q975N SOUTH       ♦︎J62
♣︎A6♠︎87643♣︎9873
15♥︎6
14HCP6♦︎AT8431FRK0
5♣︎JT47
Tricks Available (best play by both sides)
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
by
N
67767by
E
76675
by
S
67767by
W
76675
Board 17 Results
North-South Pair#NS
%
NS
MP
NS
Score
Contract
& Result
Op.
Ld.
EW
Score
EW
MP
EW
%
Pair# East-West
Alan Atkins &
Valerie Young
X4N88 3.502♠︎w+2♣︎3170 0.5013X2EAndrew Mason &
Jacquie Brown
Jill Price &
Barbara Spitz
X5N88 3.503♠︎w+1♣︎8170 0.5013X4EScott Turner &
Doug MacDougall
Ron Rogers &
Patsy Rogers
X6N50 2.002♠︎w+3♥︎3200 2.0050X6ELesley MacKay &
Judy Day
Eiler Eis &
Bob Hodgkinson
X2N25 1.003NTe=♣︎4400 3.0075X3EFrancesco L Piccone &
M Piccone
Vicki Torbett &
Niamh Kelly
X3N0 0.004♠︎w=♣︎3420 4.00100X5EZdenka Buric &
Marcia Smith
Section A Scores (two weeks ago)
ContractLeadResultN-S ScoreE-W Score
2♠︎wQ♥︎+2 170
2♠︎wA♦︎+3 200
3♠︎w3♣︎+2 200
4♠︎wQ♥︎+1 450
Three passes to West, who opens 1♠︎. North passes and East bids 1NT. South passes and West wants to make a forcing rebid, needing only a few good cards from East to make a game. West chooses 3♥︎, and East bids 3NT. A club lead holds East to nine tricks, since the defenders must get the A♦︎ and three clubs. West quickly comments that either major would have made ten tricks. What could I do? asks East. 3♠︎ with a mere doubleton? Raise to 4♥︎ with only three? At least they got to game and did better than most of the Section A folks did.
#17 D NORTH       Feb. 16, 2026
♠︎ J98Dealer: N
♥︎ QJ3 None Vul
N WEST      ♦︎ A75N  EAST      
♠︎AK7652♣︎ Q873♠︎Q3
♥︎AKT9♥︎872
♦︎JN SOUTH       ♦︎KT863
♣︎95♠︎T4♣︎A62
10♥︎6540
15HCP9♦︎Q9426FRK2
6♣︎KJT41
Tricks Available (best play by both sides)
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
by
N
32255by
E
9101087
by
S
32255by
W
9101087
Board 18 Results
North-South Pair#NS
%
NS
MP
NS
Score
Contract
& Result
Op.
Ld.
EW
Score
EW
MP
EW
%
Pair# East-West
Alan Atkins &
Valerie Young
X4N88 3.50502NTw–1♦︎6 0.5013X2EAndrew Mason &
Jacquie Brown
Ron Rogers &
Patsy Rogers
X6N88 3.50504♠︎e–1♦︎6 0.5013X6ELesley MacKay &
Judy Day
Eiler Eis &
Bob Hodgkinson
X2N50 2.002♦︎e=♥︎A90 2.0050X3EFrancesco L Piccone &
M Piccone
Vicki Torbett &
Niamh Kelly
X3N25 1.002NTe+1♦︎6150 3.0075X5EZdenka Buric &
Marcia Smith
Jill Price &
Barbara Spitz
X5N0 0.002♠︎e+2♦︎6170 4.00100X4EScott Turner &
Doug MacDougall
Section A Scores (two weeks ago)
ContractLeadResultN-S ScoreE-W Score
2♠︎w2♥︎+1 140
2Ne6♦︎+1 150
2♠︎wA♠︎+2 170
4♠︎e2♠︎+1 450
Another example of the 2NT bid I call The Intersection Bid. East opens 1NT, West bids 2♥︎, a transfer to spades, and after East completes the transfer to 2♠︎, West's rebid is 2NT, the Intersection 2NT. There are four ways for East to go from this intersection. West shows exactly five spades and invitational values. With a maximum hand, East will bid 3NT or 4♠︎. Which one depends on East's spade holding: two spades only, or a weak three, bid 3NT, but with most three-card spade suits and all four-card spade suits, East bids 4♠︎. With a minimum hand, East chooses 3♠︎, or passes 2NT. Here, East chooses 3♠︎ and it is a good choice; 4♠︎ depends on the Q♠︎ and the Q♦︎ being onside.
#18 V NORTH       Feb. 16, 2026
♠︎ QTDealer: E
♥︎ K8752 NS Vul
N WEST      ♦︎ 942D  EAST      
♠︎A8765♣︎ A42♠︎KJ3
♥︎T96♥︎Q3
♦︎KJV SOUTH       ♦︎A853
♣︎T87♠︎942♣︎KQ65
9♥︎AJ42
8HCP15♦︎QT762FRK1
8♣︎J930
Tricks Available (best play by both sides)
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
by
N
53644by
E
710789
by
S
53643by
W
710789

Work In Progress! This HTML page with results combines the ACBLscore results, the BridgeMate data, and the actual cards in each hand to make a page that displays nicely on most screens. I'll continue to develop it as I hear about problems from people. So far I have only really had time to test it on the large monitor I have at home. I've done a little bit of work in making it fit on my iPhone 15 screen (turned sideways), but the typical cellphone screen is not wide enough to display the hands alongside the results, so it relocates the hands below the results and you may need to scroll down a bit. The key is in the tabs at the top, which mean you don't need to scroll to get from results to Board 32! Just click or tap on what you want to see next!

Two things that may help: If your browser program is old, some of the tech in this page might not work 100%: the system of tabs at the top of the page requires a recent version. You really aren't doing your computer many favours if you avoid requests to upgrade the programs you use most often, like browsers. If the page works but there are large areas of a monitor unused, you might be able to make it more readable by adjusting the size of things with CTRL + (plus key), which upsizes text and other screen elements a bit. CTRL + (minus key) also works if you go too far, and CTRL + (zero) resets to the default. (This doesn't work on cellphone screens.)

How is a pair's matchpoint score on a board calculated? Your raw score is compared one by one with all of the other raw scores on the board made by pairs sitting in your direction. You get one matchpoint for each score you beat, and a half-point for each score that is the same as yours. The top score on a board is one less than the number of times it is played. If the board was not played as many times as other boards for some reason, the scores may be factored up to compensate, so that each board has the same top score.

How is a pair's total score calculated? The scoring program first checks all boards to see how many times they have been played. Usually this will be the same for all boards, but if there is a sitout or a glitch of some sort in the movement, or an artificially assigned score due to an irregularity, the scoring program must first FACTOR scores on boards played fewer times, so that the top score on every board is the same. Once that is done, the scoring program also checks to see that each pair played the same number of boards: some may have sat out and missed a round: these pairs will have their total matchpoints FACTORED so that they get matchpoints for the boards they missed, based on their percentage on the boards they did play. The total of all this summing and factoring is your final score.

How does this factoring work exactly? There are actually two types of factoring: the most common is to factor a pair's score that has not played as many boards as the other pairs. Their sum of matchpoints on the boards they played, is divided by the number of boards they played, and then multiplied by the number of boards most pairs played. The other type is covered in the next question.

I have the best score on a board but got slightly fewer matchpoints than tops on other boards, why is that? This is the other type of factoring, which happens when a board is played fewer times than other boards for some reason. Maybe a pair didn't get to it, or there was a artificial score assigned after an irregularity. Factoring a board has to take into account the small chance that, had it been played the correct number of times, the extra plays might have produced a score that is better than the current top, or lower than the current bottom. To do so, the ACBL and the World Bridge Federation use the Neuberg formula, which you can read about on Wikipedia if you want the complete details. It has its detractors, but is sort of like Winston Churchill's ranking of democracy as the second-worst system of government ... all the others being tied for first!

HCP and FRK, what on earth are they? HCP stands for highcard points, and the four numbers surrounding it show how many points each player has in a hand. The colour behind the word "HCP" is gray when the 40 points are evenly distributed between North-South and East-West, but turns more and more orange (North-South) or purple (East-West) if one side has a majority. FRK stands for Freakness, a way to describe just how freaky a hand's distribution is, on a scale from 0-20, with average for a hand being just slightly less than 3, and the average for a full deal, the sum of the freakness ratings of the four hands, is about 11.93 on average. A hand gets one freakness point for each card in a suit beyond the fourth, or less than three; plus a bonus if the hand contains at least one void (2 points) or at least one singleton but no void (1 point). The background colour behind the "FRK" shows whether the deal is hot (red), average (gray), or cold (blue) in terms of Freakness! Freakness was created by bridge expert Richard Pavlicek and searching for "pavlicek freakness" will get you quickly to his article on the subject.

What are "tricks available" and how are they calculated? Computers these days can analyze all the possible legal play lines on a deal, given a trump suit (or notrump) and a declarer, and sort all of these lines into successes and failures to come up with an optimum line of play that perfect defenders and a perfect declarer would take. The result of this line of play is the "tricks available" and is sometimes unrealistic, requiring opening leads that few if any would find, or declarer taking only the finesses that work and dropping offside singleton honours where possible. You will very quickly see from the results which deals have unrealistic "tricks available" expectations, and it is often a fun exercise to work out how you can make that many tricks. But for most deals, it is a fairly good guide as to how high a pair should bid.

Why are the masterpoints not the same as what is on ACBL Live for Clubs? This is in my view an own goal by ACBL: they have new rules for club game masterpoints but are not willing to expend the time to upgrade ACBLscore to show the masterpoints under the new rules. Luckily, most masterpoint awards actually get bigger when they go through the "engine" and are reposted on Live. The main effect is to give more masterpoints to games where the non-sitting out pairs play more boards. The problem is that the masterpoint awards that come out of ACBLscore, before being posted online, are not what you eventually get.

How can I contact McBruce to tell him what's not working for me? By e-mail: ooga@shaw.ca