VanLearners Section X Monday Evening April 20, 2026

Results for Section X, North-South
Pair#PercentScoreRankMPtsPlayers
X4N 70.83% 59.5010.42Joan Christensen - Carol Linda Ward
X5N 52.98% 44.5020.29Pam Tomlins - Tim Tomlins
X2N 50.00% 42.003/40.18John Fraser - Faye Wightman
X3N 50.00% 42.003/40.18Eiler Eis - Bob Hodgkinson
X1N 46.43% 39.00Alexa Allen - Jacquie Brown
X7N 41.07% 34.50Diane O Connor - Valerie Young
X6N 38.69% 32.50Zdenka Buric - Marcia Smith
North-South had 51.91% of the highcard points in today's deals.
The average freakness rating of today's deals (measuring the amount of distribution in the dealset as a whole) was 9.65, well below the average of about 11.93.
Results for Section X, East-West
Pair#PercentScoreRankMPtsPlayers
X3E 66.07% 55.5010.42Doug Stewart - Louise Forsyth
X1E 53.57% 45.0020.29Francesco L Piccone - M Piccone
X7E 52.38% 44.0030.21Jill Price - Barbara Spitz
X2E 46.43% 39.00Doug MacDougall - Niamh Kelly
X6E 45.24% 38.00Gaye Ballantyne - Judy Day
X5E 43.45% 36.50Vicki Torbett - Myrna Halpenny
X4E 42.86% 36.00Alan Atkins - David Rosenberg
North-South had 51.91% of the highcard points in today's deals.
The average freakness rating of today's deals (measuring the amount of distribution in the dealset as a whole) was 9.65, well below the average of about 11.93.
Board 1 Results
North-South Pair#NS
%
NS
MP
NS
Score
Contract
& Result
Op.
Ld.
EW
Score
EW
MP
EW
%
Pair# East-West
John Fraser &
Faye Wightman
X2N100 6.001002NTe–2♠︎4 0.000X3EDoug Stewart &
Louise Forsyth
Diane O Connor &
Valerie Young
X7N83 5.00501♥︎w–1♠︎8 1.0017X6EGaye Ballantyne &
Judy Day
Alexa Allen &
Jacquie Brown
X1N50 3.001NTw=♣︎790 3.0050X1EFrancesco L Piccone &
M Piccone
Pam Tomlins &
Tim Tomlins
X5N50 3.001NTw=♥︎290 3.0050X2EDoug MacDougall &
Niamh Kelly
Zdenka Buric &
Marcia Smith
X6N50 3.001NTe=♠︎590 3.0050X4EAlan Atkins &
David Rosenberg
Eiler Eis &
Bob Hodgkinson
X3N8 0.501NTw+1♣︎7120 5.5092X5EVicki Torbett &
Myrna Halpenny
Joan Christensen &
Carol Linda Ward
X4N8 0.501NTw+1♥︎6120 5.5092X7EJill Price &
Barbara Spitz
Section A Scores (three weeks ago)
ContractLeadResultN-S ScoreE-W Score
1Nw7♣︎-1 50
1Nw7♣︎-1 50
1Ne5♠︎+1 120
1Ne5♠︎+1 120
1Ne6♠︎+2 150
1Ne5♠︎+3 180
-----
Three passes to West's 1♥︎ opener. North passes and East responds 1♠︎. South passes and West's 1NT bid ends the auction. So how did four pairs get to 1NT, by *East*? Probably South opened a light 1♠︎ in third seat and West doubled. North passed and East responded 1NT. With East declaring, South leads a spade, but when dummy hits with such weak hearts, South when in with the A♦︎ should try K♥︎ and a small heart. This collects five tricks if West forgets to cover the 5♥︎, otherwise four tricks, holding the contract to eight. With West declaring 1NT, the weak hearts are concealed, and declarer finessing against the J♦︎ the right way is the way to seven tricks.
#1 D NORTH       Apr. 20, 2026
♠︎ J8Dealer: E
♥︎ AQJ62 NS Vul
N WEST      ♦︎ J84N  EAST      
♠︎A7♣︎ J97♠︎KQ32
♥︎T9843♥︎7
♦︎KT3N SOUTH       ♦︎Q965
♣︎AK5♠︎T9654♣︎6432
10♥︎K52
14HCP7♦︎A722FRK3
9♣︎QT82
Tricks Available (best play by both sides)
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
by
N
55644by
E
88799
by
S
55644by
W
88799
Board 2 Results
North-South Pair#NS
%
NS
MP
NS
Score
Contract
& Result
Op.
Ld.
EW
Score
EW
MP
EW
%
Pair# East-West
Joan Christensen &
Carol Linda Ward
X4N100 6.006303NTn+1♠︎7 0.000X7EJill Price &
Barbara Spitz
Eiler Eis &
Bob Hodgkinson
X3N75 4.506003NTn=♥︎8 1.5025X5EVicki Torbett &
Myrna Halpenny
Zdenka Buric &
Marcia Smith
X6N75 4.506003NTs=♦︎A 1.5025X4EAlan Atkins &
David Rosenberg
Alexa Allen &
Jacquie Brown
X1N50 3.001502♣︎w–3♥︎T 3.0050X1EFrancesco L Piccone &
M Piccone
Pam Tomlins &
Tim Tomlins
X5N33 2.001102♥︎s=♠︎J 4.0067X2EDoug MacDougall &
Niamh Kelly
John Fraser &
Faye Wightman
X2N17 1.003NTn–1♥︎4100 5.0083X3EDoug Stewart &
Louise Forsyth
Diane O Connor &
Valerie Young
X7N0 0.004♥︎s–2♣︎K200 6.00100X6EGaye Ballantyne &
Judy Day
Section A Scores (three weeks ago)
ContractLeadResultN-S ScoreE-W Score
2♥︎s4♣︎+1 140
3♥︎sJ♠︎= 140
3♣︎n4♠︎-1 100
4♥︎sK♣︎-1 100
1Nn4♠︎-1 100
3Nn3♠︎-1 100
-----
Tough one for North-South to stay out of game on, both have near openers with some shape and will be tempted to try a game. South opens 1♥︎ and North responds 2♣︎. South rebids 2♦︎ knowing this will not be passed after North made a two-level response. North is not seeing a fit and bravely tries 3NT, but once again we are up against that curiously common (10% or so!) type of hand where neither side has a fit, which usually favours the defenders. Here is no exception, as neither 3NT nor 4♥︎ quite make. Maybe the winning call here is a mere 2NT rebid from North.
#2 V NORTH       Apr. 20, 2026
♠︎ K32Dealer: S
♥︎ KT EW Vul
N WEST      ♦︎ KJ9D  EAST      
♠︎JT5♣︎ JT865♠︎9874
♥︎62♥︎QJ84
♦︎A753V SOUTH       ♦︎82
♣︎KQ74♠︎AQ6♣︎A93
11♥︎A97532
10HCP7♦︎QT641FRK1
12♣︎24
Tricks Available (best play by both sides)
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
by
N
87998by
E
56445
by
S
87998by
W
56445
Board 3 Results
North-South Pair#NS
%
NS
MP
NS
Score
Contract
& Result
Op.
Ld.
EW
Score
EW
MP
EW
%
Pair# East-West
John Fraser &
Faye Wightman
X2N100 6.004004♠︎e–4♦︎9 0.000X2EDoug MacDougall &
Niamh Kelly
Eiler Eis &
Bob Hodgkinson
X3N83 5.002004♥︎w–2♣︎6 1.0017X4EAlan Atkins &
David Rosenberg
Joan Christensen &
Carol Linda Ward
X4N50 3.001004♥︎w–1♠︎7 3.0050X6EGaye Ballantyne &
Judy Day
Pam Tomlins &
Tim Tomlins
X5N50 3.001003♠︎e–1♥︎A 3.0050X1EFrancesco L Piccone &
M Piccone
Zdenka Buric &
Marcia Smith
X6N50 3.001004♥︎w–1♦︎A 3.0050X3EDoug Stewart &
Louise Forsyth
Alexa Allen &
Jacquie Brown
X1N8 0.504♥︎w=♦︎2620 5.5092X7EJill Price &
Barbara Spitz
Diane O Connor &
Valerie Young
X7N8 0.504♥︎w=♣︎6620 5.5092X5EVicki Torbett &
Myrna Halpenny
Section A Scores (three weeks ago)
ContractLeadResultN-S ScoreE-W Score
4♥︎w6♣︎-1 100
4♥︎w6♣︎-1 100
3♥︎w6♣︎-1 100
3♠︎sQ♦︎-1 50
3♥︎w2♠︎= 140
4♥︎w3♠︎= 620
-----
South passes and West opens 1♥︎. North passes and East has a near-opener with a doubleton and four-card suppport, just enough for a 2NT forcing raise. South passes and West bids 3♦︎, showing shortness in diamonds. North passes and East bids 4♥︎. Since 2NT established a game-force, jumping to 4♥︎ says East has a minimum, a 3♥︎ rebid or a cuebid of one of East's aces would show extras. South reads this and abandons thoughts of sacrificing at favourable vulnerability in 4♠︎. And when the defenders get a trick in each suit, South's decision is shown to be very shrewd indeed.
#3 N NORTH       Apr. 20, 2026
♠︎ J742Dealer: W
♥︎ K96 Both Vul
V WEST      ♦︎ AT82V  EAST      
♠︎85♣︎ 62♠︎A9
♥︎AQJT5♥︎8732
♦︎QD SOUTH       ♦︎K54
♣︎QJT54♠︎KQT63♣︎A987
8♥︎41
12HCP11♦︎J97636FRK1
9♣︎K36
Tricks Available (best play by both sides)
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
by
N
68393by
E
64949
by
S
68393by
W
64949
Board 4 Results
North-South Pair#NS
%
NS
MP
NS
Score
Contract
& Result
Op.
Ld.
EW
Score
EW
MP
EW
%
Pair# East-West
Joan Christensen &
Carol Linda Ward
X4N100 6.002001NTe–2♦︎6 0.000X6EGaye Ballantyne &
Judy Day
Pam Tomlins &
Tim Tomlins
X5N83 5.001002♣︎e–1♦︎4 1.0017X1EFrancesco L Piccone &
M Piccone
Alexa Allen &
Jacquie Brown
X1N50 3.002♣︎e=♥︎A90 3.0050X7EJill Price &
Barbara Spitz
John Fraser &
Faye Wightman
X2N50 3.002♣︎e=♥︎A90 3.0050X2EDoug MacDougall &
Niamh Kelly
Diane O Connor &
Valerie Young
X7N50 3.002♣︎e=♥︎490 3.0050X5EVicki Torbett &
Myrna Halpenny
Eiler Eis &
Bob Hodgkinson
X3N17 1.001NTs–1♠︎4100 5.0083X4EAlan Atkins &
David Rosenberg
Zdenka Buric &
Marcia Smith
X6N0 0.001NTe+1♦︎4120 6.00100X3EDoug Stewart &
Louise Forsyth
Section A Scores (three weeks ago)
ContractLeadResultN-S ScoreE-W Score
2♣︎e4♦︎-2 200
1♥︎nA♣︎+2 140
2♥︎s6♣︎+1 140
1Ns4♠︎+1 120
2♠︎sQ♦︎= 110
2♠︎nA♣︎= 110
-----
West and North pass and East opens 1♣︎. South overcalls 1♦︎ and West passes. North bids 1♥︎, implying no diamond fit, and East passes, implying no extras to show. South tries 1NT and when West leads the 4♠︎ and South sees the dummy, it's another deal where nobody has an eight-card fit! (I told you they were fairly common, surprisingly, about 10% of deals.) These tend to favour the defenders, so South expects trouble. But the opening lead, to East's K♠︎ and South's ace, is an opening: South continues with the T♠︎ and if West wins the queen, South has an extra entry to dummy to cash the fifth heart and should prevail. West can duck the T♠︎ but it might be South's seventh trick when the smoke clears.
#4 V NORTH       Apr. 20, 2026
♠︎ J752Dealer: N
♥︎ KQ875 NS Vul
D WEST      ♦︎ JV  EAST      
♠︎Q864♣︎ T83♠︎K3
♥︎J963♥︎T2
♦︎Q93V SOUTH       ♦︎KT85
♣︎62♠︎AT9♣︎AKJ95
7♥︎A44
5HCP14♦︎A76421FRK3
14♣︎Q742
Tricks Available (best play by both sides)
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
by
N
68965by
E
75475
by
S
68965by
W
65475
Board 5 Results
North-South Pair#NS
%
NS
MP
NS
Score
Contract
& Result
Op.
Ld.
EW
Score
EW
MP
EW
%
Pair# East-West
Joan Christensen &
Carol Linda Ward
X4N83 5.006504♥︎s+1♣︎5 1.0017X5EVicki Torbett &
Myrna Halpenny
Diane O Connor &
Valerie Young
X7N83 5.006504♥︎s+1♣︎6 1.0017X4EAlan Atkins &
David Rosenberg
Pam Tomlins &
Tim Tomlins
X5N83 5.006504♥︎s+1♠︎2 1.0017X7EJill Price &
Barbara Spitz
John Fraser &
Faye Wightman
X2N33 2.006204♥︎s=♠︎2 4.0067X1EFrancesco L Piccone &
M Piccone
Zdenka Buric &
Marcia Smith
X6N33 2.006204♥︎s=♠︎5 4.0067X2EDoug MacDougall &
Niamh Kelly
Alexa Allen &
Jacquie Brown
X1N33 2.006204♥︎s=♦︎K 4.0067X6EGaye Ballantyne &
Judy Day
Eiler Eis &
Bob Hodgkinson
X3N0 0.006♥︎s–2♣︎5200 6.00100X3EDoug Stewart &
Louise Forsyth
Section A Scores (three weeks ago)
ContractLeadResultN-S ScoreE-W Score
4♥︎s5♣︎+1 650
4♥︎s5♣︎+1 650
4♥︎s6♣︎+1 650
4♥︎s9♣︎= 620
4♥︎s8♣︎= 620
3♥︎s2♠︎+2 200
-----
North and East pass and South opens 1♥︎. West passes and North's 2♣︎ response is the Drury Convention, asking if South has a real opener or is just being frisky in third seat. We've learned that Drury is best used with limit-raise type hands only, so South's jump to 3♥︎ says "good opener with extras." North raises to 4♥︎ and the only sad part for South is that the ten tricks available are the same as would be in notrump, and there is no way to ruff something for eleven. However, no intrepid pair has ignored the ten-card fit to actually bid notrump, so all is well when South loses a trick in each side suit.
#5 D NORTH       Apr. 20, 2026
♠︎ KT3Dealer: E
♥︎ Q852 EW Vul
N WEST      ♦︎ A632N  EAST      
♠︎J752♣︎ JT♠︎Q86
♥︎J3♥︎6
♦︎KJV SOUTH       ♦︎QT754
♣︎K9865♠︎A94♣︎Q432
10♥︎AKT9741
9HCP6♦︎983FRK4
15♣︎A74
Tricks Available (best play by both sides)
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
by
N
1071075by
E
36268
by
S
1071075by
W
36268
Board 6 Results
North-South Pair#NS
%
NS
MP
NS
Score
Contract
& Result
Op.
Ld.
EW
Score
EW
MP
EW
%
Pair# East-West
Joan Christensen &
Carol Linda Ward
X4N92 5.504603NTs+2♣︎A 0.508X5EVicki Torbett &
Myrna Halpenny
Alexa Allen &
Jacquie Brown
X1N92 5.504603NTs+2♣︎A 0.508X6EGaye Ballantyne &
Judy Day
John Fraser &
Faye Wightman
X2N67 4.004303NTs+1♣︎A 2.0033X1EFrancesco L Piccone &
M Piccone
Eiler Eis &
Bob Hodgkinson
X3N33 2.005♦︎s–1♣︎A50 4.0067X3EDoug Stewart &
Louise Forsyth
Diane O Connor &
Valerie Young
X7N33 2.005♦︎s–1♣︎A50 4.0067X4EAlan Atkins &
David Rosenberg
Zdenka Buric &
Marcia Smith
X6N33 2.005♦︎n–1♠︎250 4.0067X2EDoug MacDougall &
Niamh Kelly
Pam Tomlins &
Tim Tomlins
X5N0 0.004♥︎n–2♣︎8100 6.00100X7EJill Price &
Barbara Spitz
Section A Scores (three weeks ago)
ContractLeadResultN-S ScoreE-W Score
3Ns5♣︎+1 430
3NsT♣︎+1 430
3Ns5♣︎+1 430
4♥︎s5♦︎= 420
3NsT♣︎= 400
3Ns5♠︎-2 100
-----
East passes and South opens 2NT. North bids 3♦︎ to transfer to 3♥︎ and South complies. North's 3NT rebid shows exactly five hearts and allows South to choose which game to play; with a heart doubleton South's choice is obvious: pass and play 3NT. Three spade tricks, a heart, and five diamonds are enough to ensure that South makes 3NT without having to worry about clubs. South might take a club finesse early, hoping West might win and play another club to set up an extra trick for South. But if the defenders knock out the A♥︎ early, this might be a little risky and South may be held to the original nine tricks.
#6 N NORTH       Apr. 20, 2026
♠︎ AJDealer: S
♥︎ T9764 Both Vul
V WEST      ♦︎ QJ76D  EAST      
♠︎54♣︎ 76♠︎T98632
♥︎QJ8♥︎K52
♦︎5N SOUTH       ♦︎T93
♣︎AQT5432♠︎KQ7♣︎8
8♥︎A33
9HCP3♦︎AK8427FRK5
20♣︎KJ92
Tricks Available (best play by both sides)
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
by
N
968105by
E
46427
by
S
979106by
W
46427
Board 7 Results
North-South Pair#NS
%
NS
MP
NS
Score
Contract
& Result
Op.
Ld.
EW
Score
EW
MP
EW
%
Pair# East-West
Eiler Eis &
Bob Hodgkinson
X3N100 6.001005♦︎e–1♥︎8 0.000X2EDoug MacDougall &
Niamh Kelly
Pam Tomlins &
Tim Tomlins
X5N83 5.003NTw=♦︎4600 1.0017X6EGaye Ballantyne &
Judy Day
John Fraser &
Faye Wightman
X2N67 4.003NTw+1♦︎4630 2.0033X7EJill Price &
Barbara Spitz
Alexa Allen &
Jacquie Brown
X1N50 3.003NTw+2♠︎3660 3.0050X5EVicki Torbett &
Myrna Halpenny
Joan Christensen &
Carol Linda Ward
X4N33 2.003NTe+3♠︎A690 4.0067X4EAlan Atkins &
David Rosenberg
Zdenka Buric &
Marcia Smith
X6N17 1.006♣︎w=♠︎31370 5.0083X1EFrancesco L Piccone &
M Piccone
Diane O Connor &
Valerie Young
X7N0 0.006NTe+1♥︎81470 6.00100X3EDoug Stewart &
Louise Forsyth
Section A Scores (three weeks ago)
ContractLeadResultN-S ScoreE-W Score
5Nw3♠︎+1 690
3Ne5♥︎+3 690
3Nw3♠︎+3 690
3Nw7♦︎+4 720
6Nw4♦︎= 1440
6Nw4♦︎+1 1470
-----
East-West bid this one like a bickering married couple but it's all good in the end: West opens 2♣︎ (strong) - 3♦︎ (positive response showing values and a diamond suit), 4♣︎ (that's my suit) - 4♦︎ (mine's not that bad, you know), 4♥︎ (cue-bid), 5♦︎ (denying the A♠︎ or the A♣︎ by not cuebidding either), 6♣︎ (maybe my suit is better) - 6♦︎ (I thought we had agreed on these), 6NT (you must be joking trying to steal one from the strong hand). 6NT will make seven if North leads a non-spade, and on this auction a spade lead is virtually obvious: six tricks in each minor (overtaking the J♦︎ to get back to dummy), and the A♥︎!
#7 V NORTH       Apr. 20, 2026
♠︎ J43Dealer: W
♥︎ T63 None Vul
V WEST      ♦︎ 9764V  EAST      
♠︎K96♣︎ 543♠︎Q52
♥︎A4♥︎Q72
♦︎AJD SOUTH       ♦︎KQT532
♣︎AKQJT8♠︎AT87♣︎6
1♥︎KJ9850
22HCP9♦︎84FRK5
8♣︎9724
Tricks Available (best play by both sides)
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
by
N
03500by
E
121081212
by
S
03500by
W
12971212
Board 8 Results
North-South Pair#NS
%
NS
MP
NS
Score
Contract
& Result
Op.
Ld.
EW
Score
EW
MP
EW
%
Pair# East-West
Joan Christensen &
Carol Linda Ward
X4N83 5.001703♥︎n+1♣︎6 1.0017X4EAlan Atkins &
David Rosenberg
Alexa Allen &
Jacquie Brown
X1N83 5.001703♥︎n+1♠︎5 1.0017X5EVicki Torbett &
Myrna Halpenny
Pam Tomlins &
Tim Tomlins
X5N83 5.001703♥︎n+1♣︎6 1.0017X6EGaye Ballantyne &
Judy Day
Eiler Eis &
Bob Hodgkinson
X3N33 2.004♥︎n–1♣︎650 4.0067X2EDoug MacDougall &
Niamh Kelly
Diane O Connor &
Valerie Young
X7N33 2.003♥︎n–1♣︎650 4.0067X3EDoug Stewart &
Louise Forsyth
Zdenka Buric &
Marcia Smith
X6N33 2.004♥︎n–1♣︎Q50 4.0067X1EFrancesco L Piccone &
M Piccone
John Fraser &
Faye Wightman
X2N0 0.002♠︎w=♥︎8110 6.00100X7EJill Price &
Barbara Spitz
Section A Scores (three weeks ago)
ContractLeadResultN-S ScoreE-W Score
4♥︎n*5♠︎= 590
4♥︎n6♣︎= 420
3♥︎n9♣︎+1 170
3♥︎n6♣︎+1 170
3♥︎n8♠︎= 140
4♥︎n5♠︎-1 50
-----
West opens 1♣︎ and North overcalls 1♥︎. East makes a negative double, showing spades and some diamond tolerance. South raises to 2♥︎, and West gets a bit frisky with a jump to 3♠︎. North and South both fall for this ruse and West gets to play there, with the worst eight-card fit you'll ever see. North leads the T♣︎ and West wins in hand. Trumps must be drawn before someone gets a ruff, so West leads a small one. South wins and gives North a club ruff, but it doesn't help much. Three spades, a heart, and two diamonds, and possibly a club are West's losers, and down two or three beats letting them play 4♥︎, which somehow makes on a trump fit nearly as bad. With bad trumps, pull them!
#8 N NORTH       Apr. 20, 2026
♠︎ QJTDealer: N
♥︎ K76543 EW Vul
D WEST      ♦︎ AQ6N  EAST      
♠︎9432♣︎ T♠︎8765
♥︎AT♥︎QJ
♦︎KT5N SOUTH       ♦︎J93
♣︎AK54♠︎AK♣︎Q976
12♥︎9825
14HCP6♦︎87421FRK1
8♣︎J8321
Tricks Available (best play by both sides)
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
by
N
961086by
E
47356
by
S
961086by
W
47357
Board 9 Results
North-South Pair#NS
%
NS
MP
NS
Score
Contract
& Result
Op.
Ld.
EW
Score
EW
MP
EW
%
Pair# East-West
Alexa Allen &
Jacquie Brown
X1N100 6.001201NTs+1♥︎2 0.000X4EAlan Atkins &
David Rosenberg
Eiler Eis &
Bob Hodgkinson
X3N75 4.50901NTs=♠︎K 1.5025X1EFrancesco L Piccone &
M Piccone
Joan Christensen &
Carol Linda Ward
X4N75 4.50901♦︎n+1♠︎K 1.5025X3EDoug Stewart &
Louise Forsyth
John Fraser &
Faye Wightman
X2N33 2.003♦︎s–1♠︎J50 4.0067X6EGaye Ballantyne &
Judy Day
Diane O Connor &
Valerie Young
X7N33 2.001NTs–1♥︎T50 4.0067X2EDoug MacDougall &
Niamh Kelly
Pam Tomlins &
Tim Tomlins
X5N33 2.001NTs–1♠︎550 4.0067X5EVicki Torbett &
Myrna Halpenny
Zdenka Buric &
Marcia Smith
X6N0 0.001♠︎w=♦︎680 6.00100X7EJill Price &
Barbara Spitz
Section A Scores (three weeks ago)
ContractLeadResultN-S ScoreE-W Score
1NsK♠︎+2 150
2♦︎nK♠︎+2 130
1NsK♠︎+1 120
2♠︎wA♥︎-1 100
2♦︎s2♥︎= 90
1NsK♠︎-3 150
-----
North and East pass and South opens 1♦︎. West passes and North dredges up a minimum 1♠︎ response (but bids it normally, without hesitation or disgust or some comment that gives it away, of course). East passes and South rebids 2♣︎. West passes and North bids 2♦︎, the suit South opened. This should be seen by South as a stop sign, a red light, a warning that going farther is dangerous. South passes and West leads the K♠︎. This will be a struggle, but at least South stopped in 2♦︎, which might just make on a good day. (Another no-fit deal, nobody has an eight-card fit!)
#9 D NORTH       Apr. 20, 2026
♠︎ T8763Dealer: E
♥︎ A5 Both Vul
V WEST      ♦︎ Q76V  EAST      
♠︎KQJ5♣︎ 954♠︎A92
♥︎T932♥︎J74
♦︎T82N SOUTH       ♦︎K94
♣︎A6♠︎4♣︎QJT7
6♥︎KQ862
10HCP11♦︎AJ531FRK0
13♣︎K8323
Tricks Available (best play by both sides)
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
by
N
66687by
E
77755
by
S
66677by
W
77755
Board 10 Results
North-South Pair#NS
%
NS
MP
NS
Score
Contract
& Result
Op.
Ld.
EW
Score
EW
MP
EW
%
Pair# East-West
Pam Tomlins &
Tim Tomlins
X5N92 5.506204♥︎n=♣︎7 0.508X5EVicki Torbett &
Myrna Halpenny
Zdenka Buric &
Marcia Smith
X6N92 5.506204♥︎n=♣︎T 0.508X7EJill Price &
Barbara Spitz
Joan Christensen &
Carol Linda Ward
X4N67 4.001502NTn+1♣︎7 2.0033X3EDoug Stewart &
Louise Forsyth
Diane O Connor &
Valerie Young
X7N50 3.001202NTn=♦︎2 3.0050X2EDoug MacDougall &
Niamh Kelly
Eiler Eis &
Bob Hodgkinson
X3N33 2.002♦︎w=♠︎K90 4.0067X1EFrancesco L Piccone &
M Piccone
Alexa Allen &
Jacquie Brown
X1N17 1.004♥︎n–1♣︎K100 5.0083X4EAlan Atkins &
David Rosenberg
John Fraser &
Faye Wightman
X2N0 0.004♥︎s–2♠︎A200 6.00100X6EGaye Ballantyne &
Judy Day
Section A Scores (three weeks ago)
ContractLeadResultN-S ScoreE-W Score
2♥︎sA♠︎+2 170
1Nn4♠︎+2 150
2Nn8♦︎= 120
2♥︎sA♠︎= 110
4♥︎n2♠︎-1 100
4♥︎sA♠︎-1 100
-----
Sometimes you come up with a solution to a problem in the auction that seems brilliant and logical. The real test is if partner thinks so and reads your brilliant, logical message. Three passes precede North's 1NT opener, and after East passes a second time, South bids 2♣︎ to find out about four-card majors. West gets into the auction with a natural 2♦︎ overcall. North bids 3♦︎! What might this mean? To North it seems obvious that it should show both majors, and North-South will get to 4♥︎. But South might think this shows a diamond stopper and try 3NT instead. Surprise: both go down on best defense.
#10 V NORTH       Apr. 20, 2026
♠︎ KQT2Dealer: S
♥︎ AK94 None Vul
V WEST      ♦︎ 73D  EAST      
♠︎A♣︎ A96♠︎97643
♥︎JT63♥︎5
♦︎KQT96V SOUTH       ♦︎852
♣︎432♠︎J85♣︎KQT7
16♥︎Q8721
10HCP5♦︎AJ44FRK4
9♣︎J850
Tricks Available (best play by both sides)
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
by
N
87956by
E
45476
by
S
97956by
W
45476
Board 11 Results
North-South Pair#NS
%
NS
MP
NS
Score
Contract
& Result
Op.
Ld.
EW
Score
EW
MP
EW
%
Pair# East-West
Joan Christensen &
Carol Linda Ward
X4N92 5.501103♣︎n=♥︎A 0.508X2EDoug MacDougall &
Niamh Kelly
John Fraser &
Faye Wightman
X2N92 5.501103♣︎n=♥︎A 0.508X5EVicki Torbett &
Myrna Halpenny
Alexa Allen &
Jacquie Brown
X1N58 3.50901NTs=♥︎J 2.5042X3EDoug Stewart &
Louise Forsyth
Pam Tomlins &
Tim Tomlins
X5N58 3.50902♣︎n=♥︎A 2.5042X4EAlan Atkins &
David Rosenberg
Diane O Connor &
Valerie Young
X7N33 2.00503♥︎e–1♣︎3 4.0067X1EFrancesco L Piccone &
M Piccone
Eiler Eis &
Bob Hodgkinson
X3N8 0.503♣︎n–1♥︎A50 5.5092X7EJill Price &
Barbara Spitz
Zdenka Buric &
Marcia Smith
X6N8 0.502♠︎s–1♦︎Q50 5.5092X6EGaye Ballantyne &
Judy Day
Section A Scores (three weeks ago)
ContractLeadResultN-S ScoreE-W Score
1NnA♥︎= 90
2♥︎e3♣︎-1 50
3♦︎e3♣︎-1 50
2♥︎e5♣︎-1 50
3♣︎nA♥︎-1 50
2♥︎e5♣︎= 110
-----
South and West pass and North opens 1♣︎. East makes a takeout double and South bids 1♠︎. West passes and North rebids 1NT. East now bids 2♦︎. When a takeout doubler bids a new suit later in the auction, this shows a hand too strong for a simple overcall, about 16 or more. South passes and West is still able to pass: with a rock-crusher East would go even further and cuebid one of North-South's suits. North wisely decides that bidding 3♣︎ against a strong LHO might not go too well, and passes. 2♦︎ is unbeatable and is a good score for E-W. Remember that a takeout doubler's new suit cancels the initial meaning of the double and shows instead a strong hand.
#11 N NORTH       Apr. 20, 2026
♠︎ 84Dealer: W
♥︎ T42 NS Vul
N WEST      ♦︎ K97N  EAST      
♠︎JT95♣︎ AKQJT♠︎K3
♥︎965♥︎AKQJ
♦︎QT4D SOUTH       ♦︎A8652
♣︎942♠︎AQ762♣︎87
13♥︎8732
3HCP17♦︎J30FRK3
7♣︎6532
Tricks Available (best play by both sides)
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
by
N
77558by
E
56885
by
S
77558by
W
56885
Board 12 Results
North-South Pair#NS
%
NS
MP
NS
Score
Contract
& Result
Op.
Ld.
EW
Score
EW
MP
EW
%
Pair# East-West
Joan Christensen &
Carol Linda Ward
X4N92 5.501702♥︎n+2♣︎A 0.508X2EDoug MacDougall &
Niamh Kelly
Eiler Eis &
Bob Hodgkinson
X3N92 5.501703♥︎s+1♦︎K 0.508X7EJill Price &
Barbara Spitz
Zdenka Buric &
Marcia Smith
X6N58 3.50504♦︎w–1♠︎4 2.5042X6EGaye Ballantyne &
Judy Day
Pam Tomlins &
Tim Tomlins
X5N58 3.50503♦︎w–1♠︎4 2.5042X4EAlan Atkins &
David Rosenberg
John Fraser &
Faye Wightman
X2N33 2.002♥︎s–1♦︎K100 4.0067X5EVicki Torbett &
Myrna Halpenny
Alexa Allen &
Jacquie Brown
X1N8 0.502♦︎w+1♠︎Q110 5.5092X3EDoug Stewart &
Louise Forsyth
Diane O Connor &
Valerie Young
X7N8 0.503♦︎w=♠︎Q110 5.5092X1EFrancesco L Piccone &
M Piccone
Section A Scores (three weeks ago)
ContractLeadResultN-S ScoreE-W Score
4♥︎nA♠︎= 620
4♠︎n4♦︎= 620
3♥︎nK♦︎+1 170
2♠︎n7♥︎+1 140
2♠︎n8♦︎+1 140
3♦︎wQ♠︎= 110
-----
West opens 2♦︎ and North passes. East raises to 3♦︎ and South passes. West passes and North gets in with a double. East passes and it is up to South, who has a full opening hand. North could not take action over 2♦︎ which is a concern, but must have something. JACK thinks that on this auction, 3♥︎ is safe and 4♥︎ makes about 50% of the time, so JACK chooses 4HH. Not sure I would though. Partner can bid over 3♥︎ if that is the response he was hoping for. I would bid only 3♥︎. 4♥︎ can be beaten if the defenders lead spades and get a spade ruff, so score one for me, except that on this auction, most defenders are leading diamonds and letting declarer pull trumps. Oh well....
#12 V NORTH       Apr. 20, 2026
♠︎ QJT84Dealer: N
♥︎ Q965 Both Vul
D WEST      ♦︎ 9N  EAST      
♠︎973♣︎ K64♠︎A2
♥︎K8♥︎742
♦︎KQJ752V SOUTH       ♦︎843
♣︎72♠︎K65♣︎AJT85
8♥︎AJT34
9HCP9♦︎AT64FRK2
14♣︎Q930
Tricks Available (best play by both sides)
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
by
N
69946by
E
54396
by
S
69946by
W
54396
Board 13 Results
North-South Pair#NS
%
NS
MP
NS
Score
Contract
& Result
Op.
Ld.
EW
Score
EW
MP
EW
%
Pair# East-West
Joan Christensen &
Carol Linda Ward
X4N100 6.003003♠︎e–3♥︎T 0.000X1EFrancesco L Piccone &
M Piccone
Eiler Eis &
Bob Hodgkinson
X3N83 5.002003♥︎e–2♣︎4 1.0017X6EGaye Ballantyne &
Judy Day
Diane O Connor &
Valerie Young
X7N67 4.001303♣︎n+1♦︎K 2.0033X7EJill Price &
Barbara Spitz
Alexa Allen &
Jacquie Brown
X1N50 3.001002♠︎e–1♣︎4 3.0050X2EDoug MacDougall &
Niamh Kelly
Zdenka Buric &
Marcia Smith
X6N33 2.004♣︎n–1♦︎K100 4.0067X5EVicki Torbett &
Myrna Halpenny
John Fraser &
Faye Wightman
X2N17 1.002♥︎e=♣︎6110 5.0083X4EAlan Atkins &
David Rosenberg
Pam Tomlins &
Tim Tomlins
X5N0 0.001♠︎e+3♣︎4170 6.00100X3EDoug Stewart &
Louise Forsyth
Section A Scores (three weeks ago)
ContractLeadResultN-S ScoreE-W Score
3♣︎nK♠︎+2 150
3♣︎nK♦︎+1 130
4♥︎w4♥︎-1 100
1♠︎e8♣︎= 80
2♥︎w4♥︎+1 140
3♥︎e3♠︎= 140
-----
North opens 1♣︎ and East bids 2♣︎! In the old days, this would be a very strong takeout double, but now we all play the Michaels Convention, where a direct cuebid shows 5-5 in the majors over a minor suit opening and over a major suit opening shows 5-5 in the other major and an unknown minor (2NT asks which one). South feels a bit too vulnerable to raise to 3♣︎, and West leaps to 3♥︎ with a decent eight-count. North passes and East still has a minimum without aces, so passes as well, and now South takes the plunge to 4♣︎. This deserves to be doubled on principle, but the defenders have to be flawless to get their four tricks before North pitches a spade on the fourth diamond.
#13 D NORTH       Apr. 20, 2026
♠︎ A72Dealer: E
♥︎ 8654 None Vul
V WEST      ♦︎ A97V  EAST      
♠︎T4♣︎ AQ8♠︎KQ985
♥︎AQ9♥︎KJ732
♦︎Q6532V SOUTH       ♦︎K
♣︎973♠︎J63♣︎JT
14♥︎T0
8HCP13♦︎JT842FRK6
5♣︎K65424
Tricks Available (best play by both sides)
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
by
N
75489by
E
67944
by
S
75489by
W
67944
Board 14 Results
North-South Pair#NS
%
NS
MP
NS
Score
Contract
& Result
Op.
Ld.
EW
Score
EW
MP
EW
%
Pair# East-West
John Fraser &
Faye Wightman
X2N92 5.501503♦︎n+2♠︎A 0.508X4EAlan Atkins &
David Rosenberg
Diane O Connor &
Valerie Young
X7N92 5.501501NTs+2♥︎2 0.508X7EJill Price &
Barbara Spitz
Eiler Eis &
Bob Hodgkinson
X3N58 3.501302♦︎n+2♥︎5 2.5042X6EGaye Ballantyne &
Judy Day
Zdenka Buric &
Marcia Smith
X6N58 3.501303♦︎s+1♠︎5 2.5042X5EVicki Torbett &
Myrna Halpenny
Pam Tomlins &
Tim Tomlins
X5N33 2.001202NTs=♠︎5 4.0067X3EDoug Stewart &
Louise Forsyth
Joan Christensen &
Carol Linda Ward
X4N17 1.00901NTs=♠︎5 5.0083X1EFrancesco L Piccone &
M Piccone
Alexa Allen &
Jacquie Brown
X1N0 0.005♦︎s–1♠︎J50 6.00100X2EDoug MacDougall &
Niamh Kelly
Section A Scores (three weeks ago)
ContractLeadResultN-S ScoreE-W Score
3♦︎s2♥︎+1 130
3♦︎sT♣︎+1 130
1Ns5♠︎+1 120
3♦︎s5♠︎= 110
4♦︎n4♥︎-1 50
2♠︎eA♦︎+1 140
-----
East passes and South opens 1NT. West and North pass and East tries a 2♠︎ call. South and West pass and North gives 3♦︎ a try. East and South pass and it's West's turn to avoid letting the auction die, with a 3♠︎ call. North and East pass and South tries 4♦︎. This is passed out and goes one down, but is better than allowing 3♦︎ to make. Maybe North should have tried 3♦︎ over 1NT. East will pass and South will convert to 3NT with ♦︎AK53, and it's all on West's choice of opening lead. A spade beats 3NT easily, a club probably does as well, but a heart lead gives South two hearts, six diamonds, and the A♣︎!
#14 N NORTH       Apr. 20, 2026
♠︎ 8Dealer: S
♥︎ JT7 NS Vul
N WEST      ♦︎ J98764D  EAST      
♠︎AT75♣︎ Q54♠︎KQJ62
♥︎K632♥︎9854
♦︎Q2N SOUTH       ♦︎T
♣︎T82♠︎943♣︎KJ7
4♥︎AQ5
9HCP10♦︎AK531FRK4
17♣︎A9631
Tricks Available (best play by both sides)
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
by
N
84498by
E
59845
by
S
84598by
W
59845

Work In Progress! This HTML page with results combines the ACBLscore results, the BridgeMate data, and the actual cards in each hand to make a page that displays nicely on most screens. I'll continue to develop it as I hear about problems from people. So far I have only really had time to test it on the large monitor I have at home. I've done a little bit of work in making it fit on my iPhone 15 screen (turned sideways), but the typical cellphone screen is not wide enough to display the hands alongside the results, so it relocates the hands below the results and you may need to scroll down a bit. The key is in the tabs at the top, which mean you don't need to scroll to get from results to Board 32! Just click or tap on what you want to see next!

Two things that may help: If your browser program is old, some of the tech in this page might not work 100%: the system of tabs at the top of the page requires a recent version. You really aren't doing your computer many favours if you avoid requests to upgrade the programs you use most often, like browsers. If the page works but there are large areas of a monitor unused, you might be able to make it more readable by adjusting the size of things with CTRL + (plus key), which upsizes text and other screen elements a bit. CTRL + (minus key) also works if you go too far, and CTRL + (zero) resets to the default. (This doesn't work on cellphone screens.)

How is a pair's matchpoint score on a board calculated? Your raw score is compared one by one with all of the other raw scores on the board made by pairs sitting in your direction. You get one matchpoint for each score you beat, and a half-point for each score that is the same as yours. The top score on a board is one less than the number of times it is played. If the board was not played as many times as other boards for some reason, the scores may be factored up to compensate, so that each board has the same top score.

How is a pair's total score calculated? The scoring program first checks all boards to see how many times they have been played. Usually this will be the same for all boards, but if there is a sitout or a glitch of some sort in the movement, or an artificially assigned score due to an irregularity, the scoring program must first FACTOR scores on boards played fewer times, so that the top score on every board is the same. Once that is done, the scoring program also checks to see that each pair played the same number of boards: some may have sat out and missed a round: these pairs will have their total matchpoints FACTORED so that they get matchpoints for the boards they missed, based on their percentage on the boards they did play. The total of all this summing and factoring is your final score.

How does this factoring work exactly? There are actually two types of factoring: the most common is to factor a pair's score that has not played as many boards as the other pairs. Their sum of matchpoints on the boards they played, is divided by the number of boards they played, and then multiplied by the number of boards most pairs played. The other type is covered in the next question.

I have the best score on a board but got slightly fewer matchpoints than tops on other boards, why is that? This is the other type of factoring, which happens when a board is played fewer times than other boards for some reason. Maybe a pair didn't get to it, or there was a artificial score assigned after an irregularity. Factoring a board has to take into account the small chance that, had it been played the correct number of times, the extra plays might have produced a score that is better than the current top, or lower than the current bottom. To do so, the ACBL and the World Bridge Federation use the Neuberg formula, which you can read about on Wikipedia if you want the complete details. It has its detractors, but is sort of like Winston Churchill's ranking of democracy as the second-worst system of government ... all the others being tied for first!

HCP and FRK, what on earth are they? HCP stands for highcard points, and the four numbers surrounding it show how many points each player has in a hand. The colour behind the word "HCP" is gray when the 40 points are evenly distributed between North-South and East-West, but turns more and more orange (North-South) or purple (East-West) if one side has a majority. FRK stands for Freakness, a way to describe just how freaky a hand's distribution is, on a scale from 0-20, with average for a hand being just slightly less than 3, and the average for a full deal, the sum of the freakness ratings of the four hands, is about 11.93 on average. A hand gets one freakness point for each card in a suit beyond the fourth, or less than three; plus a bonus if the hand contains at least one void (2 points) or at least one singleton but no void (1 point). The background colour behind the "FRK" shows whether the deal is hot (red), average (gray), or cold (blue) in terms of Freakness! Freakness was created by bridge expert Richard Pavlicek and searching for "pavlicek freakness" will get you quickly to his article on the subject.

Something New! The tabs with the board numbers now indicate which side had the bulk of the high-card points (above the board number: NS: orange, EW: purple, evenly-split: gray), and the freakness rating of the deal as a whole (below the board number: flat: blue, average: gray, freaky: red)! Want to see only the hands where N-S had the points, or the freakiest ones? Check the tabs!

What are "tricks available" and how are they calculated? Computers these days can analyze all the possible legal play lines on a deal, given a trump suit (or notrump) and a declarer, and sort all of these lines into successes and failures to come up with an optimum line of play that perfect defenders and a perfect declarer would take. The result of this line of play is the "tricks available" and is sometimes unrealistic, requiring opening leads that few if any would find, or declarer taking only the finesses that work and dropping offside singleton honours where possible. You will very quickly see from the results which deals have unrealistic "tricks available" expectations, and it is often a fun exercise to work out how you can make that many tricks. But for most deals, it is a fairly good guide as to how high a pair should bid.

Why are the masterpoints not the same as what is on ACBL Live for Clubs? This is in my view an own goal by ACBL: they have new rules for club game masterpoints but are not willing to expend the time to upgrade ACBLscore to show the masterpoints under the new rules. Luckily, most masterpoint awards actually get bigger when they go through the "engine" and are reposted on Live. The main effect is to give more masterpoints to games where the non-sitting out pairs play more boards. The problem is that the masterpoint awards that come out of ACBLscore, before being posted online, are not what you eventually get.

How can I contact McBruce to tell him what's not working for me? By e-mail: ooga@shaw.ca