VanLearners Section X Monday Evening June 29, 2026

Results for Section X, North-South
Pair#PercentScoreRankMPtsPlayers
X5N 57.74% 48.5010.42Eiler Eis - Bob Hodgkinson
X6N 53.57% 45.0020.29Diane O Connor - Seann Caldwell
X2N 52.58% 44.1730.21Pam Tomlins - Tim Tomlins
X1N 50.39% 42.33John Fraser - Jandi Fraser
X3N 46.43% 39.00Alexa Allen - Jacquie Brown
X7N 45.04% 37.83Francesco L Piccone - M Piccone
X4N 44.25% 37.17Joan Christensen - Carol Linda Ward
North-South had 52.08% of the highcard points in today's deals.
The average freakness rating of today's deals (measuring the amount of distribution in the dealset as a whole) was 10.78, a bit below the average of about 11.93.
Results for Section X, East-West
Pair#PercentScoreRankMPtsPlayers
X3E 66.67% 56.0010.42Niamh Kelly - Doug MacDougall
X1E 61.70% 51.8320.29Alan Atkins - David Rosenberg
X6E 55.36% 46.5030.21Scott Turner - Donna Bridgeman
X5E 48.21% 40.50Vicki Torbett - Myrna Halpenny
X7E 43.06% 36.17Ruth Castellino - Cathy Brown
X4E 40.87% 34.33Doug Stewart - Louise Forsyth
X2E 34.13% 28.67Barbara Spitz - Marlee Sheinin
North-South had 52.08% of the highcard points in today's deals.
The average freakness rating of today's deals (measuring the amount of distribution in the dealset as a whole) was 10.78, a bit below the average of about 11.93.
Board 1 Results
North-South Pair#NS
%
NS
MP
NS
Score
Contract
& Result
Op.
Ld.
EW
Score
EW
MP
EW
%
Pair# East-West
Joan Christensen &
Carol Linda Ward
X4N83 5.004504♥︎s+1♠︎A 1.0017X7ERuth Castellino &
Cathy Brown
Eiler Eis &
Bob Hodgkinson
X5N83 5.004504♥︎s+1♣︎A 1.0017X2EBarbara Spitz &
Marlee Sheinin
Diane O Connor &
Seann Caldwell
X6N83 5.004504♥︎s+1♠︎A 1.0017X4EDoug Stewart &
Louise Forsyth
Alexa Allen &
Jacquie Brown
X3N42 2.504204♥︎s=♣︎A 3.5058X5EVicki Torbett &
Myrna Halpenny
Francesco L Piccone &
M Piccone
X7N42 2.504204♥︎s=♦︎4 3.5058X6EScott Turner &
Donna Bridgeman
Pam Tomlins &
Tim Tomlins
X2N17 1.002003♥︎s+2♠︎A 5.0083X3ENiamh Kelly &
Doug MacDougall
John Fraser &
Jandi Fraser
X1N0 0.001703♥︎s+1♠︎A 6.00100X1EAlan Atkins &
David Rosenberg
Section A Scores (three weeks ago)
ContractLeadResultN-S ScoreE-W Score
4♥︎sQ♣︎+1 450
4♥︎sA♣︎+1 450
4♥︎sA♣︎+1 450
4♥︎sA♣︎= 420
4♥︎sA♣︎= 420
North and West pass and South opens 4♥︎. Three passes follow and South's only real problem is in making an overtrick. I'm not sure how this happened at three tables, except that these deals and results (since there was no Section A game two weeks ago) are from the Thursday Evening 0-300 game in Penticton, which was won by Sylvia Males and Cindy Chan! Maybe we can ask them how the defenders let them make eleven tricks! (I'm guessing it was the heat...)
#1 D  NORTH       Jun. 29, 2026
♠︎ 8654Dealer: N
♥︎ 6 None Vul
N  WEST      ♦︎ AJ876N  EAST      
♠︎ AJ♣︎ 987♠︎ T92
♥︎ 2♥︎ A43
♦︎T542N SOUTH       ♦︎Q93
♣︎AQJ532♠︎KQ73♣︎KT64
5♥︎KQJT98754
12HCP9♦︎K6FRK0
14♣︎11
Tricks Available (best play by both sides)
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
by
N
491063by
E
843710
by
S
491063by
W
843710
Board 2 Results
North-South Pair#NS
%
NS
MP
NS
Score
Contract
& Result
Op.
Ld.
EW
Score
EW
MP
EW
%
Pair# East-West
John Fraser &
Jandi Fraser
X1N100 6.001702♠︎n+2♥︎A 0.000X1EAlan Atkins &
David Rosenberg
Alexa Allen &
Jacquie Brown
X3N75 4.501402♠︎s+1♥︎T 1.5025X5EVicki Torbett &
Myrna Halpenny
Joan Christensen &
Carol Linda Ward
X4N75 4.501402♠︎n+1♥︎A 1.5025X7ERuth Castellino &
Cathy Brown
Pam Tomlins &
Tim Tomlins
X2N25 1.503♠︎s–1♥︎2100 4.5075X3ENiamh Kelly &
Doug MacDougall
Francesco L Piccone &
M Piccone
X7N25 1.503♠︎s–1♣︎5100 4.5075X6EScott Turner &
Donna Bridgeman
Eiler Eis &
Bob Hodgkinson
X5N25 1.503♦︎n–1♥︎A100 4.5075X2EBarbara Spitz &
Marlee Sheinin
Diane O Connor &
Seann Caldwell
X6N25 1.501NTn–1♥︎3100 4.5075X4EDoug Stewart &
Louise Forsyth
Section A Scores (three weeks ago)
ContractLeadResultN-S ScoreE-W Score
2♠︎nA♥︎+3 200
2NnA♥︎+2 180
2♠︎sK♣︎+2 170
1NnA♥︎+2 150
2♠︎nA♥︎+1 140
North picks up a nice hand with the dealer on the left and for once everyone passes so North can open 1♦︎. (1NT is OK on this one as well.) East overcalls 1♥︎ and South finds a 1♠︎ response. West cuebids 2♦︎ to show heart support but North applies maximum pressure with a raise to 4♠︎. North's hand has grown from 17 to about 20 in support of spades. But South is a light as they come, so it is a struggle. Since South must ruff the third club in dummy, it makes the most sense to engineer that ruff, then play A♠︎, T♠︎, and run the ten, which works well when East has the queen. South loses a club, a heart and a diamond and makes four for a good score.
#2 V  NORTH       Jun. 29, 2026
♠︎ AT3Dealer: E
♥︎ Q54 NS Vul
N  WEST      ♦︎ AKT62D  EAST      
♠︎ 87♣︎ A3♠︎ Q92
♥︎ T92♥︎ AK863
♦︎QJ84V SOUTH       ♦︎9
♣︎KQJ5♠︎KJ654♣︎T984
17♥︎J72
9HCP9♦︎7531FRK4
5♣︎7622
Tricks Available (best play by both sides)
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
by
N
910595by
E
33838
by
S
910595by
W
33748
Board 3 Results
North-South Pair#NS
%
NS
MP
NS
Score
Contract
& Result
Op.
Ld.
EW
Score
EW
MP
EW
%
Pair# East-West
Pam Tomlins &
Tim Tomlins
X2N100 6.001NTn–1♣︎250 0.000X2EBarbara Spitz &
Marlee Sheinin
John Fraser &
Jandi Fraser
X1N75 4.501NTe=♠︎390 1.5025X7ERuth Castellino &
Cathy Brown
Eiler Eis &
Bob Hodgkinson
X5N75 4.501♣︎e+1♠︎390 1.5025X1EAlan Atkins &
David Rosenberg
Alexa Allen &
Jacquie Brown
X3N50 3.002♠︎w=♥︎4110 3.0050X4EDoug Stewart &
Louise Forsyth
Francesco L Piccone &
M Piccone
X7N25 1.501NTw+1♥︎4120 4.5075X5EVicki Torbett &
Myrna Halpenny
Diane O Connor &
Seann Caldwell
X6N25 1.501NTw+1♦︎5120 4.5075X3ENiamh Kelly &
Doug MacDougall
Joan Christensen &
Carol Linda Ward
X4N0 0.001NTe+2♠︎4150 6.00100X6EScott Turner &
Donna Bridgeman
Section A Scores (three weeks ago)
ContractLeadResultN-S ScoreE-W Score
1♠︎nK♥︎-1 50
1Ne3♠︎= 90
1Nn2♣︎-2 100
2♠︎wJ♦︎= 110
2Ne3♠︎= 120
South and West pass and North opens 1♦︎. East has a good hand but no convenient bid: 1NT would show 15 at least, and doubling with three-card support in both majors is asking for trouble, especially with a passed hand opposite that would be forced to bid. So East passes and South responds 1♠︎. West passes and North's 1NT is the final contract. North's first look at dummy indicates considerable work to be done, and the likely result is down one or two or even more. If East bids, on this layout East gets lucky, but most of the time partner will not have as many as eight points on this auction....
#3 N  NORTH       Jun. 29, 2026
♠︎ 65Dealer: S
♥︎ AT54 EW Vul
V  WEST      ♦︎ JT75V  EAST      
♠︎ Q987♣︎ AQ5♠︎ AT2
♥︎ 962♥︎ KQ8
♦︎AQ8D SOUTH       ♦︎K43
♣︎984♠︎KJ43♣︎JT72
11♥︎J731
8HCP13♦︎9620FRK0
8♣︎K630
Tricks Available (best play by both sides)
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
by
N
55675by
E
88668
by
S
55675by
W
88668
Board 4 Results
North-South Pair#NS
%
NS
MP
NS
Score
Contract
& Result
Op.
Ld.
EW
Score
EW
MP
EW
%
Pair# East-West
John Fraser &
Jandi Fraser
X1N92 5.506303NTn+1♥︎6 0.508X7ERuth Castellino &
Cathy Brown
Eiler Eis &
Bob Hodgkinson
X5N92 5.506303NTn+1♣︎8 0.508X1EAlan Atkins &
David Rosenberg
Alexa Allen &
Jacquie Brown
X3N58 3.501303♦︎n+1♥︎K 2.5042X4EDoug Stewart &
Louise Forsyth
Pam Tomlins &
Tim Tomlins
X2N58 3.501302♦︎n+2♥︎A 2.5042X2EBarbara Spitz &
Marlee Sheinin
Joan Christensen &
Carol Linda Ward
X4N33 2.004♣︎n–1♥︎A100 4.0067X6EScott Turner &
Donna Bridgeman
Francesco L Piccone &
M Piccone
X7N8 0.502♥︎e=♣︎A110 5.5092X5EVicki Torbett &
Myrna Halpenny
Diane O Connor &
Seann Caldwell
X6N8 0.502♥︎e=♦︎2110 5.5092X3ENiamh Kelly &
Doug MacDougall
Section A Scores (three weeks ago)
ContractLeadResultN-S ScoreE-W Score
3Nn6♥︎+1 630
2Ne4♦︎-3 300
3♦︎nA♥︎+2 150
5♦︎nA♥︎-1 100
2♥︎wK♣︎+1 140
West passes and North opens 1♦︎. East makes a Michaels cuebid of 2♦︎, showing 5-5 in the majors. South pre-empts to 4♦︎ (to show a strong hand, South could cuebid either major), and West takes a shot at 4♠︎. It goes down two and looks like a disaster until East-West realize that North-South can make at least nine tricks in notrump. Only one problem: just one pair gets there. Sympathy to West: two known eight-card fits usually work together well.
#4 V  NORTH       Jun. 29, 2026
♠︎ K8Dealer: W
♥︎ QJ7 All Vul
D  WEST      ♦︎ AQ83V  EAST      
♠︎ Q94♣︎ KQJ7♠︎ AJT72
♥︎ T32♥︎ AK865
♦︎JTV SOUTH       ♦︎97
♣︎T9642♠︎653♣︎8
18♥︎941
3HCP12♦︎K65422FRK6
7♣︎A532
Tricks Available (best play by both sides)
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
by
N
1055108by
E
38835
by
S
64497by
W
38835
Board 5 Results
North-South Pair#NS
%
NS
MP
NS
Score
Contract
& Result
Op.
Ld.
EW
Score
EW
MP
EW
%
Pair# East-West
John Fraser &
Jandi Fraser
X1N75 4.501403♥︎s=♣︎3 1.5025X6EScott Turner &
Donna Bridgeman
Pam Tomlins &
Tim Tomlins
X2N75 4.501401♥︎s+2♣︎3 1.5025X1EAlan Atkins &
David Rosenberg
Francesco L Piccone &
M Piccone
X7N75 4.501402♥︎s+1♦︎9 1.5025X4EDoug Stewart &
Louise Forsyth
Diane O Connor &
Seann Caldwell
X6N75 4.501402♥︎s+1♠︎6 1.5025X2EBarbara Spitz &
Marlee Sheinin
Alexa Allen &
Jacquie Brown
X3N25 1.501102♥︎s=♠︎6 4.5075X3ENiamh Kelly &
Doug MacDougall
Joan Christensen &
Carol Linda Ward
X4N25 1.501102♥︎s=♣︎9 4.5075X5EVicki Torbett &
Myrna Halpenny
Eiler Eis &
Bob Hodgkinson
X5N0 0.002♠︎w=♥︎K110 6.00100X7ERuth Castellino &
Cathy Brown
Section A Scores (three weeks ago)
ContractLeadResultN-S ScoreE-W Score
2♥︎sT♠︎+1 140
2♥︎sT♠︎+1 140
2♥︎sT♠︎+1 140
1♥︎sT♠︎+2 140
2♥︎sT♠︎= 110
North passes, East opens 1♣︎, and South overcalls 1♥︎. West passes and North bids 1NT, which would be a great final contract except that most Souths will try 2♥︎. The Q♥︎ is both onside and doubleton and if you began with the J♥︎ and ran it and lost, you need to rethink your play strategy! In hearts there are four losers, three diamonds and the A♠︎. In notrump there are the same four losers and nine tricks available, which scores 150 to 2♥︎+1's 140. But 2♥︎ is probably better, since on another layout the opponents might have four diamond tricks to cash....
#5 D  NORTH       Jun. 29, 2026
♠︎ J42Dealer: N
♥︎ K3 NS Vul
N  WEST      ♦︎ 864N  EAST      
♠︎ T9876♣︎ AJ754♠︎ A53
♥︎ T54♥︎ Q6
♦︎AT9V SOUTH       ♦︎KQ7
♣︎93♠︎KQ♣︎QT862
9♥︎AJ98722
4HCP13♦︎J5322FRK2
14♣︎K6
Tricks Available (best play by both sides)
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
by
N
96986by
E
46446
by
S
96986by
W
46446
Board 6 Results
North-South Pair#NS
%
NS
MP
NS
Score
Contract
& Result
Op.
Ld.
EW
Score
EW
MP
EW
%
Pair# East-West
Diane O Connor &
Seann Caldwell
X6N100 6.004003NTn=♠︎3 0.000X2EBarbara Spitz &
Marlee Sheinin
Francesco L Piccone &
M Piccone
X7N83 5.001802NTn+2♠︎3 1.0017X4EDoug Stewart &
Louise Forsyth
Alexa Allen &
Jacquie Brown
X3N58 3.501501NTn+2♠︎3 2.5042X3ENiamh Kelly &
Doug MacDougall
John Fraser &
Jandi Fraser
X1N58 3.501502NTn+1♠︎3 2.5042X6EScott Turner &
Donna Bridgeman
Joan Christensen &
Carol Linda Ward
X4N33 2.001201NTn+1♦︎2 4.0067X5EVicki Torbett &
Myrna Halpenny
Eiler Eis &
Bob Hodgkinson
X5N17 1.001102♦︎n+1♥︎3 5.0083X7ERuth Castellino &
Cathy Brown
Pam Tomlins &
Tim Tomlins
X2N0 0.003NTn–1♠︎350 6.00100X1EAlan Atkins &
David Rosenberg
Section A Scores (three weeks ago)
ContractLeadResultN-S ScoreE-W Score
3Nn3♠︎+1 430
3Nn3♠︎= 400
3Nn3♠︎= 400
1Nn3♠︎+3 180
2Nn3♠︎-1 50
South and North bid simply to 3NT: 1♣︎ - 1♦︎, 1NT - 3NT. But there are modern complications to this you should know. The 1♦︎ response does NOT deny a four-card major. If responder has a hand strong enough to open, as North does, 1♦︎ can be bid with a major suit since responder expects to be bidding again. The bypassing of a diamond suit to bid a major only happens when responder is minimal and may only get one call. South's 1NT rebid also does not deny a four-card major: opener's job is to describe with a rebid, and 1NT says 12-14 balanced. If North wants to seek out a possible 4-4 major suit fit, it can still be done over 1NT. (3NT can be beaten, but I can't see how...)
#6 N  NORTH       Jun. 29, 2026
♠︎ J8Dealer: E
♥︎ KQ2 EW Vul
V  WEST      ♦︎ KT763D  EAST      
♠︎ T94♣︎ A42♠︎ A763
♥︎ J865♥︎ AT3
♦︎Q54N SOUTH       ♦︎J92
♣︎QT7♠︎KQ52♣︎J95
13♥︎9742
5HCP10♦︎A80FRK0
12♣︎K8631
Tricks Available (best play by both sides)
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
by
N
88999by
E
44444
by
S
88899by
W
44444
Board 7 Results
North-South Pair#NS
%
NS
MP
NS
Score
Contract
& Result
Op.
Ld.
EW
Score
EW
MP
EW
%
Pair# East-West
Joan Christensen &
Carol Linda Ward
X4N100 6.006204♥︎s=♣︎A 0.000X4EDoug Stewart &
Louise Forsyth
John Fraser &
Jandi Fraser
X1N83 5.002004♠︎w–2♥︎2 1.0017X5EVicki Torbett &
Myrna Halpenny
Alexa Allen &
Jacquie Brown
X3N67 4.001402♥︎s+1♣︎A 2.0033X2EBarbara Spitz &
Marlee Sheinin
Pam Tomlins &
Tim Tomlins
X2N50 3.001102♥︎s=♣︎A 3.0050X7ERuth Castellino &
Cathy Brown
Eiler Eis &
Bob Hodgkinson
X5N25 1.504♥︎s–2♠︎5200 4.5075X6EScott Turner &
Donna Bridgeman
Diane O Connor &
Seann Caldwell
X6N25 1.504♥︎s–2♣︎A200 4.5075X1EAlan Atkins &
David Rosenberg
Francesco L Piccone &
M Piccone
X7N0 0.004♥︎s–3♠︎4300 6.00100X3ENiamh Kelly &
Doug MacDougall
Section A Scores (three weeks ago)
ContractLeadResultN-S ScoreE-W Score
4♥︎sA♣︎= 620
2NsT♠︎= 120
3♥︎sA♣︎-1 100
4♥︎sA♣︎-2 200
4♥︎sA♣︎-3 300
South opens 1♥︎ and West might double, or overcall 1♠︎. North will be tempted to raise to 2♥︎ on the known fit, but there are good six counts and bad six counts, and this is pretty bad. Better to wait and see. If North bids 2♥︎, South will raise to game and go down, possibly two or more and possibly doubled, and definitely vulnerable. If North passes, East will pass a 1♠︎ overcall and bid 2♣︎ over a takeout double. South will bid hearts again and now North can invite, having sent the key message with the original pass.
#7 V  NORTH       Jun. 29, 2026
♠︎ J2Dealer: S
♥︎ 932 All Vul
V  WEST      ♦︎ QJ76V  EAST      
♠︎ T9654♣︎ Q732♠︎ A8
♥︎ ♥︎ T864
♦︎A542D SOUTH       ♦︎K93
♣︎AKJ4♠︎KQ73♣︎T965
6♥︎AKQJ751
12HCP7♦︎T86FRK1
15♣︎86
Tricks Available (best play by both sides)
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
by
N
76853by
E
575810
by
S
76853by
W
575810
Board 8 Results
North-South Pair#NS
%
NS
MP
NS
Score
Contract
& Result
Op.
Ld.
EW
Score
EW
MP
EW
%
Pair# East-West
Pam Tomlins &
Tim Tomlins
X2N100 6.002♥︎e+2♦︎8170 0.000X7ERuth Castellino &
Cathy Brown
Alexa Allen &
Jacquie Brown
X3N50 3.004♥︎e+1♣︎6450 3.0050X2EBarbara Spitz &
Marlee Sheinin
Joan Christensen &
Carol Linda Ward
X4N50 3.004♥︎e+1♦︎8450 3.0050X4EDoug Stewart &
Louise Forsyth
Diane O Connor &
Seann Caldwell
X6N50 3.004♥︎e+1♦︎3450 3.0050X1EAlan Atkins &
David Rosenberg
Francesco L Piccone &
M Piccone
X7N50 3.004♥︎e+1♣︎6450 3.0050X3ENiamh Kelly &
Doug MacDougall
Eiler Eis &
Bob Hodgkinson
X5N50 3.004♥︎e+1♦︎3450 3.0050X6EScott Turner &
Donna Bridgeman
John Fraser &
Jandi Fraser
X1N0 0.003NTe+2♠︎4460 6.00100X5EVicki Torbett &
Myrna Halpenny
Section A Scores (three weeks ago)
ContractLeadResultN-S ScoreE-W Score
3♥︎e9♣︎+1 170
4♥︎e9♣︎+1 450
4♥︎e9♣︎+1 450
4♥︎e9♣︎+1 450
4♥︎e9♣︎+1 450
West and North pass and East opens 1♥︎. South passes and East has a single raise to 2♥︎. North passes and East slaps the 4♥︎ card on the table. Seeing dummy and winning the club lead in hand, East figures on a trump loser (possibly two if there is a bad split) and the locations of the K♦︎ and K♠︎ will determine how many more losers there are. The spade finesse has the most to gain, since if it works East can cash the A♠︎ next and ruff the third; so, K♥︎, spade to the Q♠︎ (it wins!), A♠︎, ruff a spade, diamond to the jack and South's queen. Not much South can do from here, and trumps are 3-2 so there is only one loser and eleven tricks is the normal score. 
#8 N  NORTH       Jun. 29, 2026
♠︎ K875Dealer: W
♥︎ QJT None Vul
D  WEST      ♦︎ 95N  EAST      
♠︎ T3♣︎ QJT4♠︎ AQ2
♥︎ K53♥︎ A8764
♦︎Q742N SOUTH       ♦︎AJT6
♣︎K532♠︎J964♣︎A
9♥︎921
8HCP19♦︎K831FRK4
4♣︎98761
Tricks Available (best play by both sides)
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
by
N
25225by
E
9811118
by
S
25225by
W
9811118
Board 9 Results
North-South Pair#NS
%
NS
MP
NS
Score
Contract
& Result
Op.
Ld.
EW
Score
EW
MP
EW
%
Pair# East-West
Alexa Allen &
Jacquie Brown
X3N83 5.004504♠︎n+1♣︎T 1.0017X1EAlan Atkins &
David Rosenberg
Francesco L Piccone &
M Piccone
X7N83 5.004504♠︎n+1♦︎K 1.0017X2EBarbara Spitz &
Marlee Sheinin
Eiler Eis &
Bob Hodgkinson
X5N83 5.004504♠︎s+1♦︎T 1.0017X5EVicki Torbett &
Myrna Halpenny
Pam Tomlins &
Tim Tomlins
X2N50 3.004204♠︎n=♣︎T 3.0050X6EScott Turner &
Donna Bridgeman
John Fraser &
Jandi Fraser
X1N33 2.002002♠︎n+3♣︎T 4.0067X4EDoug Stewart &
Louise Forsyth
Joan Christensen &
Carol Linda Ward
X4N8 0.504♠︎n–1♦︎K50 5.5092X3ENiamh Kelly &
Doug MacDougall
Diane O Connor &
Seann Caldwell
X6N8 0.504♠︎n–1♣︎350 5.5092X7ERuth Castellino &
Cathy Brown
Section A Scores (three weeks ago)
ContractLeadResultN-S ScoreE-W Score
4♠︎s9♣︎+1 450
5♠︎n9♣︎= 450
5♠︎n9♣︎= 450
4♠︎n9♣︎= 420
6♠︎n9♣︎-1 50
Common problem: you are South, partner opens 1♠︎, East overcalls 2♦︎. With 12 points and spade support you must not let the auction die below game, but 2♠︎ and 3♠︎ are non-forcing, and 4♠︎ might miss the chance at a slam if partner has a good hand. The solution? A cuebid of 3♦︎. This shows a good hand with support for partner's suit, and North has no trouble bidding 4♠︎ and making eleven tricks. If the overcall is at the 1-level (example: 1♥︎ opener, 1♠︎ overcall), you can use the 2-level cuebid, 2♠︎ to show heart support, and the jump cuebid 3♠︎ to ask partner to bid 3NT with a spade stopper. Science!
#9 D  NORTH       Jun. 29, 2026
♠︎ AQ942Dealer: N
♥︎ KJT65 EW Vul
V  WEST      ♦︎ JV  EAST      
♠︎ 65♣︎ QJ♠︎ K8
♥︎ A92♥︎ Q73
♦︎T87N SOUTH       ♦︎KQ6532
♣︎98654♠︎JT73♣︎T3
14♥︎846
4HCP10♦︎A942FRK4
12♣︎AK721
Tricks Available (best play by both sides)
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
by
N
611958by
E
42375
by
S
611958by
W
42375
Board 10 Results
North-South Pair#NS
%
NS
MP
NS
Score
Contract
& Result
Op.
Ld.
EW
Score
EW
MP
EW
%
Pair# East-West
Eiler Eis &
Bob Hodgkinson
X5N100 6.003002NTw–3♥︎2 0.000X5EVicki Torbett &
Myrna Halpenny
Joan Christensen &
Carol Linda Ward
X4N75 4.502002♦︎w–2♥︎2 1.5025X3ENiamh Kelly &
Doug MacDougall
Diane O Connor &
Seann Caldwell
X6N75 4.502002♠︎e–2♦︎7 1.5025X7ERuth Castellino &
Cathy Brown
Francesco L Piccone &
M Piccone
X7N50 3.001402♠︎s+1♥︎A 3.0050X2EBarbara Spitz &
Marlee Sheinin
Alexa Allen &
Jacquie Brown
X3N17 1.001002NTw–1♦︎5 5.0083X1EAlan Atkins &
David Rosenberg
Pam Tomlins &
Tim Tomlins
X2N17 1.001002♦︎w–1♥︎T 5.0083X6EScott Turner &
Donna Bridgeman
John Fraser &
Jandi Fraser
X1N17 1.001001NTw–1♠︎2 5.0083X4EDoug Stewart &
Louise Forsyth
Section A Scores (three weeks ago)
ContractLeadResultN-S ScoreE-W Score
1NsK♦︎+1 120
1♦︎wT♥︎-1 100
2♦︎n6♣︎= 90
1NwT♥︎= 90
1NsK♦︎-1 100
East passes and South opens 1NT. West has a good hand but no safe bid to make, so 1NT becomes the final contract. West leads the K♦︎ and South wins the ace in dummy and sees that the T♦︎ and J♦︎ in hand will combine to produce a second diamond trick. Two top spades and the A♣︎ make five, and knocking out the AK♥︎ will net two more heart tricks, so that's where to begin. West wins the heart and sees that diamonds is a dead end, so switches to a low club. This is no better, as South plays low from dummy, taking East's queen with the ace and knocking out the other high heart. West cashes the Q♦︎ and K♣︎ but can't win much more and South makes at least eight tricks. 
#10 V  NORTH       Jun. 29, 2026
♠︎ 432Dealer: E
♥︎ T982 All Vul
V  WEST      ♦︎ AT65D  EAST      
♠︎ 87♣︎ J8♠︎ QT96
♥︎ AK6♥︎ 743
♦︎KQ42V SOUTH       ♦︎983
♣︎K952♠︎AKJ5♣︎Q76
5♥︎QJ51
15HCP4♦︎J71FRK0
16♣︎AT431
Tricks Available (best play by both sides)
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
by
N
88987by
E
55455
by
S
88987by
W
55456
Board 11 Results
North-South Pair#NS
%
NS
MP
NS
Score
Contract
& Result
Op.
Ld.
EW
Score
EW
MP
EW
%
Pair# East-West
Joan Christensen &
Carol Linda Ward
X4N92 5.50504♠︎w–1♣︎K 0.508X2EBarbara Spitz &
Marlee Sheinin
Diane O Connor &
Seann Caldwell
X6N92 5.50504♠︎e–1♣︎2 0.508X6EScott Turner &
Donna Bridgeman
Pam Tomlins &
Tim Tomlins
X2N67 4.003♠︎e=♣︎T140 2.0033X5EVicki Torbett &
Myrna Halpenny
Eiler Eis &
Bob Hodgkinson
X5N50 3.003♠︎e+1♥︎2170 3.0050X4EDoug Stewart &
Louise Forsyth
John Fraser &
Jandi Fraser
X1N33 2.005♣︎*s–2♠︎Q300 4.0067X3ENiamh Kelly &
Doug MacDougall
Alexa Allen &
Jacquie Brown
X3N8 0.504♠︎e=♦︎3420 5.5092X7ERuth Castellino &
Cathy Brown
Francesco L Piccone &
M Piccone
X7N8 0.504♠︎e=♣︎A420 5.5092X1EAlan Atkins &
David Rosenberg
Section A Scores (three weeks ago)
ContractLeadResultN-S ScoreE-W Score
4♠︎eQ♥︎-1 50
5♣︎sQ♠︎-1 50
4♣︎sQ♠︎-2 100
3♠︎eJ♦︎= 140
3♠︎e*A♣︎+1 630
South opens 1♣︎, West passes, and North bids 1♦︎. East pre-empts with a jump to 3♠︎ and when South passes, West joins the party with a raise to 4♠︎, not intending to make it as much as trying to disrupt the North-South auction. North tries 5♣︎, but after East and South pass, West is still going strong with a 5♠︎ call! Not a bad contract until East dioscovers a trump loser to go with the two club losers. It seldom pays to raise a pre-empt more than once. Better would be for West to hope for a defensive trick from East to beat 4♠︎. Two raises is like bumping the pinball machine enough to cause a TILT and lose the ball.
#11 N  NORTH       Jun. 29, 2026
♠︎ Dealer: S
♥︎ KT9 None Vul
N  WEST      ♦︎ 97542N  EAST      
♠︎ QT64♣︎ KQ765♠︎ AJ98732
♥︎ A865♥︎ 73
♦︎A86D SOUTH       ♦︎KQ
♣︎93♠︎K5♣︎84
8♥︎QJ427
10HCP10♦︎JT31FRK6
12♣︎AJT21
Tricks Available (best play by both sides)
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
by
N
63898by
E
59444
by
S
63788by
W
59444
Board 12 Results
North-South Pair#NS
%
NS
MP
NS
Score
Contract
& Result
Op.
Ld.
EW
Score
EW
MP
EW
%
Pair# East-West
Eiler Eis &
Bob Hodgkinson
X5N100 6.006204♥︎s=♣︎A 0.000X4EDoug Stewart &
Louise Forsyth
Pam Tomlins &
Tim Tomlins
X2N75 4.501402♥︎s+1♣︎A 1.5025X5EVicki Torbett &
Myrna Halpenny
Diane O Connor &
Seann Caldwell
X6N75 4.501402♥︎s+1♣︎6 1.5025X6EScott Turner &
Donna Bridgeman
Alexa Allen &
Jacquie Brown
X3N33 2.00501NTw–1♠︎A 4.0067X7ERuth Castellino &
Cathy Brown
Joan Christensen &
Carol Linda Ward
X4N33 2.00501♣︎w–1♠︎A 4.0067X2EBarbara Spitz &
Marlee Sheinin
John Fraser &
Jandi Fraser
X1N33 2.00501♣︎w–1♠︎A 4.0067X3ENiamh Kelly &
Doug MacDougall
Francesco L Piccone &
M Piccone
X7N0 0.002♥︎s–1♦︎4100 6.00100X1EAlan Atkins &
David Rosenberg
Section A Scores (three weeks ago)
ContractLeadResultN-S ScoreE-W Score
2♥︎s8♦︎+2 170
2♣︎wA♠︎-3 150
2♥︎s8♦︎+1 140
1♠︎w6♦︎= 80
3Nn7♦︎-1 100
West opens 1♣︎ and North decides to pass and await developments. East passes and South bids 1♥︎. West now rebids 1♠︎ and it is up to North what to do with the near opener. The optimist will bid 4♥︎, knowing that most of the missing high cards are marked with West and this may help in the play. The pessimist realizes that South's 1♥︎ bid may not be full value when the alternative is passing out 1♣︎, so an invite of 3♥︎ may be better. This time the pessimistic Norths win the day, as there are two trump losers along with a club and a club ruff (or two clubs if East gets in and makes the first club lead), limiting South to nine tricks.
#12 V  NORTH       Jun. 29, 2026
♠︎ AK63Dealer: W
♥︎ KT7 NS Vul
D  WEST      ♦︎ QT6N  EAST      
♠︎ QT97♣︎ T87♠︎ J542
♥︎ A6♥︎ Q92
♦︎84V SOUTH       ♦︎97532
♣︎AQJ65♠︎8♣︎4
12♥︎J85430
13HCP3♦︎AKJ3FRK4
12♣︎K9324
Tricks Available (best play by both sides)
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
by
N
76877by
E
57455
by
S
76978by
W
57455
Board 13 Results
North-South Pair#NS
%
NS
MP
NS
Score
Contract
& Result
Op.
Ld.
EW
Score
EW
MP
EW
%
Pair# East-West
Pam Tomlins &
Tim Tomlins
X2N92 5.501702♠︎s+2♦︎5 0.508X4EDoug Stewart &
Louise Forsyth
Francesco L Piccone &
M Piccone
X7N92 5.501702♠︎s+2♣︎4 0.508X7ERuth Castellino &
Cathy Brown
Eiler Eis &
Bob Hodgkinson
X5N58 3.501402♥︎s+1♣︎4 2.5042X3ENiamh Kelly &
Doug MacDougall
Diane O Connor &
Seann Caldwell
X6N58 3.501402♠︎s+1♦︎A 2.5042X5EVicki Torbett &
Myrna Halpenny
Alexa Allen &
Jacquie Brown
X3N33 2.002NTs–1♠︎4100 4.0067X6EScott Turner &
Donna Bridgeman
John Fraser &
Jandi Fraser
X1N17 1.003♥︎s–2♣︎Q200 5.0083X2EBarbara Spitz &
Marlee Sheinin
Joan Christensen &
Carol Linda Ward
X4N0 0.002♦︎s–3♣︎7300 6.00100X1EAlan Atkins &
David Rosenberg
Section A Scores (three weeks ago)
ContractLeadResultN-S ScoreE-W Score
1Nw3♦︎-2 200
2♠︎sQ♣︎+1 140
2♥︎sQ♣︎+1 140
1Nw3♦︎= 90
2♠︎sQ♣︎-1 100
North opens 1♦︎ and East passes. South responds 1♠︎ and West passes. Wait, what? 15 points and stoppers in both opponents' suits and West passes? Yes! West realizes that on this auction, East cannot have much: at most about seven points or so, probably a lot less than that. West's clever pass is vindicated when South decides to bid 4♥︎ on a seven-card fit, which has no play. Another of the surprisingly common hands where all suits are six or seven card fits for both sides; the defence usually prevails in these!
#13 D  NORTH       Jun. 29, 2026
♠︎ ATDealer: N
♥︎ A86 All Vul
V  WEST      ♦︎ K8432V  EAST      
♠︎ KJ84♣︎ 853♠︎ 73
♥︎ K54♥︎ JT3
♦︎AQT5V SOUTH       ♦︎976
♣︎Q4♠︎Q9652♣︎JT972
11♥︎Q9722
15HCP2♦︎J1FRK2
12♣︎AK64
Tricks Available (best play by both sides)
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
by
N
79976by
E
54457
by
S
79976by
W
64467
Board 14 Results
North-South Pair#NS
%
NS
MP
NS
Score
Contract
& Result
Op.
Ld.
EW
Score
EW
MP
EW
%
Pair# East-West
John Fraser &
Jandi Fraser
X1N75 4.501102♠︎n=♣︎3 1.5025X2EBarbara Spitz &
Marlee Sheinin
Francesco L Piccone &
M Piccone
X7N75 4.501102♠︎n=♦︎3 1.5025X7ERuth Castellino &
Cathy Brown
Diane O Connor &
Seann Caldwell
X6N42 2.50501NTw–1♠︎A 3.5058X5EVicki Torbett &
Myrna Halpenny
Eiler Eis &
Bob Hodgkinson
X5N42 2.50501NTw–1♠︎7 3.5058X3ENiamh Kelly &
Doug MacDougall
Joan Christensen &
Carol Linda Ward
X4N8 0.502♠︎n–1♣︎650 5.5092X1EAlan Atkins &
David Rosenberg
Pam Tomlins &
Tim Tomlins
X2N8 0.502♠︎n–1♦︎350 5.5092X4EDoug Stewart &
Louise Forsyth
Alexa Allen &
Jacquie Brown
X3N50 3.0050-50 -- 3.0050X6EScott Turner &
Donna Bridgeman
Section A Scores (three weeks ago)
ContractLeadResultN-S ScoreE-W Score
2♠︎n8♣︎= 110
2♠︎n8♣︎= 110
1Nw7♠︎-1 50
1Nw7♠︎= 90
2♠︎n8♣︎-2 100
East and South pass and West has a clear 1NT opener. Should North bid 2♠︎, or try to defend 1NT? If North passes, East might transfer to hearts and North would be happy to overcall spades in that case. But bidding 2♠︎ right away is risky with only four top tricks. Better to keep the option of defending 1NT alive, where a low spade lead may set up the rest of the suit for six tricks with the two side aces, plus whatever partner can contribute. As it turns out, defending 1NT is best, the low spade catches partner's Q♠︎ and North-South get at least seven tricks. 2♠︎ made twice but good defense should hold it to seven tricks.
#14 N  NORTH       Jun. 29, 2026
♠︎ AK873Dealer: E
♥︎ A54 None Vul
N  WEST      ♦︎ A42D  EAST      
♠︎ JT6♣︎ 95♠︎ 92
♥︎ KJT2♥︎ Q96
♦︎KQ7N SOUTH       ♦︎J93
♣︎AK2♠︎Q54♣︎T8643
15♥︎8732
17HCP3♦︎T8650FRK2
5♣︎QJ70
Tricks Available (best play by both sides)
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
by
N
77665by
E
55768
by
S
77665by
W
55768

Work In Progress! This HTML page with results combines the ACBLscore results, the BridgeMate data, and the actual cards in each hand to make a page that displays nicely on most screens. I'll continue to develop it as I hear about problems from people. So far I have only really had time to test it on the large monitor I have at home. I've done a little bit of work in making it fit on my iPhone 15 screen (turned sideways), but the typical cellphone screen is not wide enough to display the hands alongside the results, so it relocates the hands below the results and you may need to scroll down a bit. The key is in the tabs at the top, which mean you don't need to scroll to get from results to Board 32! Just click or tap on what you want to see next!

Two things that may help: If your browser program is old, some of the tech in this page might not work 100%: the system of tabs at the top of the page requires a recent version. You really aren't doing your computer many favours if you avoid requests to upgrade the programs you use most often, like browsers. If the page works but there are large areas of a monitor unused, you might be able to make it more readable by adjusting the size of things with CTRL + (plus key), which upsizes text and other screen elements a bit. CTRL + (minus key) also works if you go too far, and CTRL + (zero) resets to the default. (This doesn't work on cellphone screens.)

How is a pair's matchpoint score on a board calculated? Your raw score is compared one by one with all of the other raw scores on the board made by pairs sitting in your direction. You get one matchpoint for each score you beat, and a half-point for each score that is the same as yours. The top score on a board is one less than the number of times it is played. If the board was not played as many times as other boards for some reason, the scores may be factored up to compensate, so that each board has the same top score.

How is a pair's total score calculated? The scoring program first checks all boards to see how many times they have been played. Usually this will be the same for all boards, but if there is a sitout or a glitch of some sort in the movement, or an artificially assigned score due to an irregularity, the scoring program must first FACTOR scores on boards played fewer times, so that the top score on every board is the same. Once that is done, the scoring program also checks to see that each pair played the same number of boards: some may have sat out and missed a round: these pairs will have their total matchpoints FACTORED so that they get matchpoints for the boards they missed, based on their percentage on the boards they did play. The total of all this summing and factoring is your final score.

How does this factoring work exactly? There are actually two types of factoring: the most common is to factor a pair's score that has not played as many boards as the other pairs. Their sum of matchpoints on the boards they played, is divided by the number of boards they played, and then multiplied by the number of boards most pairs played. The other type is covered in the next question.

I have the best score on a board but got slightly fewer matchpoints than tops on other boards, why is that? This is the other type of factoring, which happens when a board is played fewer times than other boards for some reason. Maybe a pair didn't get to it, or there was a artificial score assigned after an irregularity. Factoring a board has to take into account the small chance that, had it been played the correct number of times, the extra plays might have produced a score that is better than the current top, or lower than the current bottom. To do so, the ACBL and the World Bridge Federation use the Neuberg formula, which you can read about on Wikipedia if you want the complete details. It has its detractors, but is sort of like Winston Churchill's ranking of democracy as the second-worst system of government ... all the others being tied for first!

HCP and FRK, what on earth are they? HCP stands for highcard points, and the four numbers surrounding it show how many points each player has in a hand. The colour behind the word "HCP" is gray when the 40 points are evenly distributed between North-South and East-West, but turns more and more orange (North-South) or purple (East-West) if one side has a majority. FRK stands for Freakness, a way to describe just how freaky a hand's distribution is, on a scale from 0-20, with average for a hand being just slightly less than 3, and the average for a full deal, the sum of the freakness ratings of the four hands, is about 11.93 on average. A hand gets one freakness point for each card in a suit beyond the fourth, or less than three; plus a bonus if the hand contains at least one void (2 points) or at least one singleton but no void (1 point). The background colour behind the "FRK" shows whether the deal is hot (red), average (gray), or cold (blue) in terms of Freakness! Freakness was created by bridge expert Richard Pavlicek and searching for "pavlicek freakness" will get you quickly to his article on the subject.

Something New! The tabs with the board numbers now indicate which side had the bulk of the high-card points (above the board number: NS: orange, EW: purple, evenly-split: gray), and the freakness rating of the deal as a whole (below the board number: flat: blue, average: gray, freaky: red)! Want to see only the hands where N-S had the points, or the freakiest ones? Check the tabs!

What are "tricks available" and how are they calculated? Computers these days can analyze all the possible legal play lines on a deal, given a trump suit (or notrump) and a declarer, and sort all of these lines into successes and failures to come up with an optimum line of play that perfect defenders and a perfect declarer would take. The result of this line of play is the "tricks available" and is sometimes unrealistic, requiring opening leads that few if any would find, or declarer taking only the finesses that work and dropping offside singleton honours where possible. You will very quickly see from the results which deals have unrealistic "tricks available" expectations, and it is often a fun exercise to work out how you can make that many tricks. But for most deals, it is a fairly good guide as to how high a pair should bid.

Why are the masterpoints not the same as what is on ACBL Live for Clubs? This is in my view an own goal by ACBL: they have new rules for club game masterpoints but are not willing to expend the time to upgrade ACBLscore to show the masterpoints under the new rules. Luckily, most masterpoint awards actually get bigger when they go through the "engine" and are reposted on Live. The main effect is to give more masterpoints to games where the non-sitting out pairs play more boards. The problem is that the masterpoint awards that come out of ACBLscore, before being posted online, are not what you eventually get.

How can I contact McBruce to tell him what's not working for me? By e-mail: oogashawca@gmail.com (the old shaw.ca address is gone)