VanLearners Section X Monday Evening August 10, 2026

Results for Section X, North-South
Pair#PercentScoreRankMPtsPlayers
X2N 59.45% 66.5810.63Eiler Eis - Bob Hodgkinson
X8N 57.28% 64.1520.44John Fraser - Jandi Fraser
X5N 56.24% 62.9930.32Francesco L Piccone - M Piccone
X7N 51.46% 57.6440.22Joan Christensen - Carol Linda Ward
X4N 48.98% 54.86Pam Tomlins - Tim Tomlins
X3N 44.00% 49.28Jacquie Brown - Alexa Allen
X1N 43.69% 48.93Diane O Connor - Valerie Young
X6N 38.90% 43.57Faye Wightman - Diane Hardouin
East-West had 51.16% of the highcard points in today's deals.
The average freakness rating of today's deals (measuring the amount of distribution in the dealset as a whole) was 11.32, a bit below the average of about 11.93.
Results for Section X, East-West
Pair#PercentScoreRankMPtsPlayers
X8E 70.28% 78.7110.63David Hsu - Amanda Hill
X6E 65.83% 73.7320.44Doug Stewart - Louise Forsythe
X9E 63.99% 71.6730.32Gillian Raphael - Howard Raphael
X1E 52.04% 58.2940.22Cathy Brown - Ruth Castellino
X4E 45.78% 51.27Curtis Ballard - Elizabeth Ballard
X2E 45.76% 51.25Niamh Kelly - Doug MacDougall
X7E 43.44% 48.65David Rosenberg - Alan Atkins
X3E 33.88% 37.95Donna Bridgeman - Myrna Halpenny
X5E 28.71% 32.16Barbara Spitz - Marlee Sheinin
East-West had 51.16% of the highcard points in today's deals.
The average freakness rating of today's deals (measuring the amount of distribution in the dealset as a whole) was 11.32, a bit below the average of about 11.93.
Board 1 Results
North-South Pair#NS
%
NS
MP
NS
Score
Contract
& Result
Op.
Ld.
EW
Score
EW
MP
EW
%
Pair# East-West
Pam Tomlins &
Tim Tomlins
X4N99 6.933♦︎e+1♠︎4130 0.071X7EDavid Rosenberg &
Alan Atkins
Joan Christensen &
Carol Linda Ward
X7N66 4.642♦︎e+3♣︎A150 2.3634X4ECurtis Ballard &
Elizabeth Ballard
Diane O Connor &
Valerie Young
X1N66 4.642NTe+1♥︎4150 2.3634X1ECathy Brown &
Ruth Castellino
Jacquie Brown &
Alexa Allen
X3N66 4.643♦︎e+2♣︎A150 2.3634X5EBarbara Spitz &
Marlee Sheinin
Faye Wightman &
Diane Hardouin
X6N26 1.793NTe=♥︎2400 5.2174X2ENiamh Kelly &
Doug MacDougall
Francesco L Piccone &
M Piccone
X5N26 1.795♦︎e=♣︎A400 5.2174X9EGillian Raphael &
Howard Raphael
John Fraser &
Jandi Fraser
X8N1 0.073NTe+1♣︎3430 6.9399X6EDoug Stewart &
Louise Forsythe
Section A Scores (three weeks ago)
ContractLeadResultN-S ScoreE-W Score
1Nw5♠︎+2 150
3Ne3♥︎= 400
3Ne3♥︎= 400
3Nw5♠︎= 400
3Ne2♠︎+1 430
3Ne5♠︎+1 430
North and South sit this auction out and East opens 1♦︎ in second chair. West responds 2♣︎ and East rebids 2♦︎, knowing that West's two-level response will not let the auction end there. West raises to 3♦︎ and East continues with 3♥︎. This bid should make it easy for West to bid 3NT: 3♥︎ clearly is looking for game but concerned about the one unbid suit. Most of Section A saw this clearly and bid 3NT, but JACK saw trouble ahead, maybe in the club suit, which without help will require two losers to set up, and chose 5♦︎ instead. Both contracts make for a score of 400, but 3NT at some tables scored a key overtrick when the defenders slipped.
#1 D  NORTH       Aug. 10, 2026
♠︎ J985Dealer: N
♥︎ K95 None Vul
N  WEST      ♦︎ AT4N  EAST      
♠︎ AK♣︎ K86♠︎ Q63
♥︎ J♥︎ AQ76
♦︎6532N SOUTH       ♦︎KQJ87
♣︎QJT972♠︎T742♣︎5
11♥︎T84320
11HCP14♦︎96FRK4
4♣︎A434
Tricks Available (best play by both sides)
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
by
N
47624by
E
967119
by
S
47624by
W
967119
Board 2 Results
North-South Pair#NS
%
NS
MP
NS
Score
Contract
& Result
Op.
Ld.
EW
Score
EW
MP
EW
%
Pair# East-West
John Fraser &
Jandi Fraser
X8N99 6.931102♦︎n+1♠︎2 0.071X6EDoug Stewart &
Louise Forsythe
Joan Christensen &
Carol Linda Ward
X7N83 5.791003♠︎e–2♦︎Q 1.2117X4ECurtis Ballard &
Elizabeth Ballard
Jacquie Brown &
Alexa Allen
X3N66 4.640PASS0 2.3634X5EBarbara Spitz &
Marlee Sheinin
Faye Wightman &
Diane Hardouin
X6N34 2.362NTs–1♣︎7100 4.6466X2ENiamh Kelly &
Doug MacDougall
Francesco L Piccone &
M Piccone
X5N34 2.362♣︎s–1♥︎T100 4.6466X9EGillian Raphael &
Howard Raphael
Diane O Connor &
Valerie Young
X1N34 2.362NTs–1♠︎3100 4.6466X1ECathy Brown &
Ruth Castellino
Pam Tomlins &
Tim Tomlins
X4N1 0.072♥︎n–2♠︎A200 6.9399X7EDavid Rosenberg &
Alan Atkins
Section A Scores (three weeks ago)
ContractLeadResultN-S ScoreE-W Score
2Ns3♠︎+2 180
1NsT♥︎+1 120
1NsJ♣︎-1 100
1♠︎wA♣︎+1 110
2Ns7♣︎-2 200
1Ns3♠︎-3 300
This time it is North-South's auction, South opening 1♣︎ in second seat and North responding 1♥︎. South's rebid of 1NT shows 11-14 balanced, and North can leave it there with 10 or decide that there is a small chance to make 3NT if South has 13 or 14 and try 2NT. North's ten points are augmented by a five-card suit and the ace of South's opened suit, but spades may be a problem. South's 13 is enough to try 3NT, but with seven of the 13 in South's shortest suit, the smart move is to pass 2NT. Making eight tricks in notrump depends on which minor suit South decides to focus on: diamonds are a pip better (AQT♦︎ vs. AQ9♣︎) and a small diamond to the queen forces East's hand and sets up the suit.
#2 V  NORTH       Aug. 10, 2026
♠︎ T7Dealer: E
♥︎ Q832 NS Vul
N  WEST      ♦︎ AT862D  EAST      
♠︎ K653♣︎ A3♠︎ AJ42
♥︎ T5♥︎ J9764
♦︎975V SOUTH       ♦︎KJ
♣︎KJT7♠︎Q98♣︎65
10♥︎AK3
7HCP10♦︎Q431FRK3
13♣︎Q98422
Tricks Available (best play by both sides)
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
by
N
85697by
E
58746
by
S
85697by
W
57646
Board 3 Results
North-South Pair#NS
%
NS
MP
NS
Score
Contract
& Result
Op.
Ld.
EW
Score
EW
MP
EW
%
Pair# East-West
Eiler Eis &
Bob Hodgkinson
X2N99 6.935601♦︎*n+3♠︎7 0.071X2ENiamh Kelly &
Doug MacDougall
Joan Christensen &
Carol Linda Ward
X7N66 4.641301♦︎n+3♠︎7 2.3634X3EDonna Bridgeman &
Myrna Halpenny
John Fraser &
Jandi Fraser
X8N66 4.641301♦︎n+3♥︎7 2.3634X5EBarbara Spitz &
Marlee Sheinin
Diane O Connor &
Valerie Young
X1N66 4.641303♦︎n+1♣︎5 2.3634X9EGillian Raphael &
Howard Raphael
Faye Wightman &
Diane Hardouin
X6N34 2.361101♦︎n+2♠︎A 4.6466X1ECathy Brown &
Ruth Castellino
Francesco L Piccone &
M Piccone
X5N9 0.644♠︎n–1♥︎750 6.3691X8EDavid Hsu &
Amanda Hill
Pam Tomlins &
Tim Tomlins
X4N9 0.645♦︎s–1♣︎250 6.3691X6EDoug Stewart &
Louise Forsythe
Section A Scores (three weeks ago)
ContractLeadResultN-S ScoreE-W Score
1♦︎n5♣︎+3 130
1♦︎n2♦︎+2 110
5♦︎n*7♥︎-1 100
6♦︎n7♣︎-2 100
4♠︎n7♥︎-2 100
4♠︎n7♥︎-2 100
North opens 1♦︎ in third seat and South cannot pass with seven points, 1NT is the only option. North rebids strongly with 2♠︎, and South attempts to shut down the auction in 3NT. North overrules with a 4♠︎ call. South over-overrules by shifting to 5♦︎. East over-over-overrules by doubling for penalties. All this does is bring East-West back to par, since 5♦︎ goes one down doubled, equalling 4♠︎ down two and 6♦︎ down one (somehow UNdoubled by a napping East!). Now, if you held the North hand and partner passed your 1♦︎ opener, would you be happy to see that dummy? Despite the result, I would be concerned about missing games and slams later if partner can pass opening bids with hands that strong....
#3 N  NORTH       Aug. 10, 2026
♠︎ KQ643Dealer: S
♥︎ AK EW Vul
V  WEST      ♦︎ AQ7632V  EAST      
♠︎ 852♣︎ ♠︎ AJ7
♥︎ J6432♥︎ QT7
♦︎D SOUTH       ♦︎KJ54
♣︎QT832♠︎T9♣︎J75
18♥︎9859
3HCP12♦︎T987FRK0
7♣︎AK9642
Tricks Available (best play by both sides)
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
by
N
786107by
E
55736
by
S
786107by
W
65736
Board 4 Results
North-South Pair#NS
%
NS
MP
NS
Score
Contract
& Result
Op.
Ld.
EW
Score
EW
MP
EW
%
Pair# East-West
John Fraser &
Jandi Fraser
X8N99 6.931002♦︎w–1♣︎4 0.071X5EBarbara Spitz &
Marlee Sheinin
Eiler Eis &
Bob Hodgkinson
X2N83 5.790PASS0 1.2117X2ENiamh Kelly &
Doug MacDougall
Joan Christensen &
Carol Linda Ward
X7N50 3.502♦︎w=♣︎490 3.5050X3EDonna Bridgeman &
Myrna Halpenny
Diane O Connor &
Valerie Young
X1N50 3.501NTe=♥︎590 3.5050X9EGillian Raphael &
Howard Raphael
Pam Tomlins &
Tim Tomlins
X4N50 3.502♦︎w=♠︎390 3.5050X6EDoug Stewart &
Louise Forsythe
Francesco L Piccone &
M Piccone
X5N17 1.212♦︎w+1♥︎2110 5.7983X8EDavid Hsu &
Amanda Hill
Faye Wightman &
Diane Hardouin
X6N1 0.073♥︎s–3♦︎2300 6.9399X1ECathy Brown &
Ruth Castellino
Section A Scores (three weeks ago)
ContractLeadResultN-S ScoreE-W Score
1Nw2♥︎-1 100
1Nw8♣︎-1 100
3Nw4♣︎-1 100
1Nw2♥︎= 90
1Nw2♥︎= 90
2♦︎w6♣︎+1 110
Another uncontested auction: West opens 1♦︎ as dealer, and East responds 1♠︎. West rebids 1NT, showing 11-14 balanced, and what should East rebid? Many chose to pass 1NT and watched partner struggle to make seven tricks, failing more often than not. But if East considers the auction, West can only open 1♦︎ with three diamonds in one distributional pattern: 4=4=3=2. And if West has that pattern, West will support spades with four, not rebid 1NT. Thus West MUST have four or more diamonds, and East's hand in support of diamonds is worth a raise to 3♦︎ (7 points plus three for the singleton and another for fine trumps). Bidding 2♦︎ only might let North-South into the auction easier.
#4 V  NORTH       Aug. 10, 2026
♠︎ QT3Dealer: W
♥︎ AJ72 All Vul
D  WEST      ♦︎ KT7V  EAST      
♠︎ K6♣︎ 854♠︎ J987
♥︎ K863♥︎ 4
♦︎Q982V SOUTH       ♦︎AJ53
♣︎AT7♠︎A542♣︎J962
10♥︎QT950
12HCP7♦︎641FRK3
11♣︎KQ31
Tricks Available (best play by both sides)
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
by
N
66745by
E
66698
by
S
66745by
W
67698
Board 5 Results
North-South Pair#NS
%
NS
MP
NS
Score
Contract
& Result
Op.
Ld.
EW
Score
EW
MP
EW
%
Pair# East-West
Jacquie Brown &
Alexa Allen
X3N99 6.93503NTw–1♥︎7 0.071X3EDonna Bridgeman &
Myrna Halpenny
Francesco L Piccone &
M Piccone
X5N83 5.793♣︎e=♦︎2110 1.2117X7EDavid Rosenberg &
Alan Atkins
John Fraser &
Jandi Fraser
X8N58 4.075♦︎w=♠︎J400 2.9342X4ECurtis Ballard &
Elizabeth Ballard
Faye Wightman &
Diane Hardouin
X6N58 4.075♦︎w=♠︎J400 2.9342X9EGillian Raphael &
Howard Raphael
Joan Christensen &
Carol Linda Ward
X7N17 1.213NTe+1♠︎7430 5.7983X2ENiamh Kelly &
Doug MacDougall
Eiler Eis &
Bob Hodgkinson
X2N17 1.213NTe+1♠︎6430 5.7983X1ECathy Brown &
Ruth Castellino
Diane O Connor &
Valerie Young
X1N17 1.213NTe+1♠︎7430 5.7983X8EDavid Hsu &
Amanda Hill
Section A Scores (three weeks ago)
ContractLeadResultN-S ScoreE-W Score
5♦︎wJ♠︎-2 100
5♦︎wJ♠︎-1 50
3♦︎wJ♠︎+2 150
5♦︎wJ♠︎= 400
5♦︎wJ♠︎+1 420
3NeQ♣︎+1 430
North passes and East opens 1♣︎. South overcalls 1♠︎ and West makes a negative double, showing four hearts and tolerance for diamonds. North passes and East does not hold back, choosing 3NT. This is a variant of an auction we've seen before: opening a minor and rebidding not 2NT to show 18-19 balanced, but 3NT to show a strong hand with a long minor that if set up will provide the majority of the tricks. In this case, the club distribution prevents clubs from providing tricks, but the other three suits come to the rescue easily. With other pairs likely to be in 5♦︎, declarers in 3NT should set their sights on a crucial overtrick to outscore 5♦︎ making five or even six.
#5 D  NORTH       Aug. 10, 2026
♠︎ JDealer: N
♥︎ QJ9765 NS Vul
N  WEST      ♦︎ 754N  EAST      
♠︎ 8543♣︎ 985♠︎ KQ2
♥︎ AKT8♥︎ 4
♦︎AQ986V SOUTH       ♦︎KJT
♣︎♠︎AT976♣︎AKT763
4♥︎325
13HCP16♦︎326FRK5
7♣︎QJ423
Tricks Available (best play by both sides)
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
by
N
34513by
E
1098119
by
S
34513by
W
1098119
Board 6 Results
North-South Pair#NS
%
NS
MP
NS
Score
Contract
& Result
Op.
Ld.
EW
Score
EW
MP
EW
%
Pair# East-West
Eiler Eis &
Bob Hodgkinson
X2N91 6.361003NTw–1♠︎6 0.649X1ECathy Brown &
Ruth Castellino
Jacquie Brown &
Alexa Allen
X3N91 6.361004♥︎w–1♠︎6 0.649X3EDonna Bridgeman &
Myrna Halpenny
Francesco L Piccone &
M Piccone
X5N66 4.642♣︎e=♥︎490 2.3634X7EDavid Rosenberg &
Alan Atkins
John Fraser &
Jandi Fraser
X8N50 3.502NTe+1♦︎Q150 3.5050X4ECurtis Ballard &
Elizabeth Ballard
Joan Christensen &
Carol Linda Ward
X7N26 1.793NTe=♦︎4600 5.2174X2ENiamh Kelly &
Doug MacDougall
Diane O Connor &
Valerie Young
X1N26 1.793NTe=♥︎4600 5.2174X8EDavid Hsu &
Amanda Hill
Faye Wightman &
Diane Hardouin
X6N1 0.073NTe+1♦︎4630 6.9399X9EGillian Raphael &
Howard Raphael
Section A Scores (three weeks ago)
ContractLeadResultN-S ScoreE-W Score
1Nw6♠︎+3 180
2Nw6♠︎+2 180
3Ne4♦︎= 600
3Nw6♠︎+1 630
3Nw6♠︎+1 630
3♠︎n*K♥︎-4 800
East has 15 points and could be described as semibalanced, but decides on a different path, opening 1♣︎ and rebidding 1NT over the expected major suit response. This actually shows 11-14 balanced, but West raises to 2NT and East is happy to bid 3NT. A 1NT opener would end in the same spot after a Stayman call by West and a 2♦︎ call denying a four-card major by East. 3NT goes down if South finds the killer lead of the Q♠︎, setting up four tricks in the suit if South can get in again for a second spade lead through the West holding. Not sure how WEST played notrump so often in Section A on these cards. Maybe 1♦︎ - 1♥︎ - 2♣︎ - 2NT? I don't see the rebid problem with opening 1♣︎ here.
#6 N  NORTH       Aug. 10, 2026
♠︎ AJ86Dealer: E
♥︎ J92 EW Vul
V  WEST      ♦︎ T3D  EAST      
♠︎ KT32♣︎ T763♠︎ 75
♥︎ AQ65♥︎ K3
♦︎952N SOUTH       ♦︎AJ86
♣︎Q8♠︎Q94♣︎AK542
6♥︎T8741
11HCP15♦︎KQ741FRK3
8♣︎J91
Tricks Available (best play by both sides)
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
by
N
55544by
E
88899
by
S
55544by
W
88799
Board 7 Results
North-South Pair#NS
%
NS
MP
NS
Score
Contract
& Result
Op.
Ld.
EW
Score
EW
MP
EW
%
Pair# East-West
John Fraser &
Jandi Fraser
X8N99 6.933♥︎w+1♣︎6170 0.071X3EDonna Bridgeman &
Myrna Halpenny
Joan Christensen &
Carol Linda Ward
X7N58 4.074♥︎w=♦︎4620 2.9342X1ECathy Brown &
Ruth Castellino
Eiler Eis &
Bob Hodgkinson
X2N58 4.074♥︎w=♦︎9620 2.9342X9EGillian Raphael &
Howard Raphael
Pam Tomlins &
Tim Tomlins
X4N58 4.074♥︎w=♣︎6620 2.9342X4ECurtis Ballard &
Elizabeth Ballard
Jacquie Brown &
Alexa Allen
X3N58 4.074♥︎w=♣︎Q620 2.9342X2ENiamh Kelly &
Doug MacDougall
Faye Wightman &
Diane Hardouin
X6N17 1.214♥︎w+1♦︎8650 5.7983X8EDavid Hsu &
Amanda Hill
Diane O Connor &
Valerie Young
X1N1 0.073NTw+2♦︎4660 6.9399X7EDavid Rosenberg &
Alan Atkins
Section A Scores (three weeks ago)
ContractLeadResultN-S ScoreE-W Score
2Nw9♦︎+3 210
4♥︎wQ♣︎= 620
4♥︎w3♠︎= 620
4♥︎w9♦︎+1 650
4♥︎w4♦︎+1 650
4♥︎w4♦︎+1 650
West and East have the auction to themselves, with West opening 1♥︎ in second seat, and East responding 1♠︎. West rebids 3♥︎ to show a good six-card suit and a hand about an ace or more better than a minimum. East bids 4♣︎, which in this context should be a cuebid in support of hearts: with a singleton or void in hearts East will pass 3♥︎ or try 3NT; anything else implies some support, thus a new suit should be a cuebid and an attempt at slam. West cooperates by bidding 4♠︎, going past 4♥︎ to show a spade control. However, what concerns East is that West could not bid 4♦︎, so East parks in 5♥︎. Good choice, I tried several ways but could not manage to make twelve tricks!
#7 V  NORTH       Aug. 10, 2026
♠︎ J53Dealer: S
♥︎ 984 All Vul
V  WEST      ♦︎ 9854V  EAST      
♠︎ 2♣︎ QJ6♠︎ AK986
♥︎ AKQ762♥︎ JT
♦︎Q72D SOUTH       ♦︎6
♣︎A83♠︎QT74♣︎KT754
4♥︎530
15HCP11♦︎AKJT35FRK6
10♣︎923
Tricks Available (best play by both sides)
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
by
N
33151by
E
101011711
by
S
33151by
W
101011711
Board 8 Results
North-South Pair#NS
%
NS
MP
NS
Score
Contract
& Result
Op.
Ld.
EW
Score
EW
MP
EW
%
Pair# East-West
John Fraser &
Jandi Fraser
X8N83 5.794603NTn+2♥︎3 1.2117X3EDonna Bridgeman &
Myrna Halpenny
Eiler Eis &
Bob Hodgkinson
X2N83 5.794603NTn+2♥︎6 1.2117X9EGillian Raphael &
Howard Raphael
Diane O Connor &
Valerie Young
X1N83 5.794603NTs+2♥︎7 1.2117X7EDavid Rosenberg &
Alan Atkins
Faye Wightman &
Diane Hardouin
X6N50 3.504204♠︎n=♥︎A 3.5050X8EDavid Hsu &
Amanda Hill
Pam Tomlins &
Tim Tomlins
X4N34 2.362003♠︎n+2♣︎2 4.6466X4ECurtis Ballard &
Elizabeth Ballard
Joan Christensen &
Carol Linda Ward
X7N9 0.641502♣︎s+3♥︎7 6.3691X1ECathy Brown &
Ruth Castellino
Jacquie Brown &
Alexa Allen
X3N9 0.641503♣︎s+2♥︎7 6.3691X2ENiamh Kelly &
Doug MacDougall
Section A Scores (three weeks ago)
ContractLeadResultN-S ScoreE-W Score
3Nn6♥︎+1 430
4♠︎n2♣︎= 420
4♠︎n2♣︎= 420
4♠︎sT♥︎= 420
3Nn3♥︎= 400
3Nn4♥︎= 400
Interesting information from JACK on this auction: West passes, North opens 1♦︎, and East overcalls 1♥︎. South makes a textbook negative double, showing four spades and tolerance for clubs. West passes and North, with a completely minimum hand but four-card support for spades, jumps to 2♠︎. Isn't a 1♠︎ rebid enough here? Doesn't the jump show extras? JACK says no, a 1♠︎ rebid in this spot promises only three spades, a useful agreement for this specific sequence that I have not seen elsewhere. South has an easy 4♠︎ call and ten tricks are assured even when the defenders begin with a club to the ace and a club ruff.
#8 N  NORTH       Aug. 10, 2026
♠︎ A643Dealer: W
♥︎ K4 None Vul
D  WEST      ♦︎ AQ87N  EAST      
♠︎ J8♣︎ 975♠︎ T97
♥︎ T7♥︎ A8632
♦︎T9542N SOUTH       ♦︎KJ63
♣︎A864♠︎KQ52♣︎2
13♥︎QJ951
5HCP8♦︎3FRK4
14♣︎KQJT36
Tricks Available (best play by both sides)
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
by
N
10108611by
E
22572
by
S
9108611by
W
22562
Board 9 Results
North-South Pair#NS
%
NS
MP
NS
Score
Contract
& Result
Op.
Ld.
EW
Score
EW
MP
EW
%
Pair# East-West
Jacquie Brown &
Alexa Allen
X3N99 6.934303NTn+1♦︎6 0.071X1ECathy Brown &
Ruth Castellino
Pam Tomlins &
Tim Tomlins
X4N83 5.794204♠︎s=♥︎8 1.2117X3EDonna Bridgeman &
Myrna Halpenny
Francesco L Piccone &
M Piccone
X5N66 4.644003NTn=♦︎Q 2.3634X5EBarbara Spitz &
Marlee Sheinin
John Fraser &
Jandi Fraser
X8N50 3.501703♠︎n+1♣︎T 3.5050X2ENiamh Kelly &
Doug MacDougall
Joan Christensen &
Carol Linda Ward
X7N26 1.791503♣︎s+2♠︎A 5.2174X9EGillian Raphael &
Howard Raphael
Eiler Eis &
Bob Hodgkinson
X2N26 1.791503♣︎s+2♠︎A 5.2174X8EDavid Hsu &
Amanda Hill
Diane O Connor &
Valerie Young
X1N1 0.074♠︎s–1♥︎650 6.9399X6EDoug Stewart &
Louise Forsythe
Section A Scores (three weeks ago)
ContractLeadResultN-S ScoreE-W Score
4♠︎nT♣︎+2 480
4♠︎nQ♦︎+2 480
4♠︎nK♥︎+1 450
4♠︎s7♦︎= 420
4♠︎sJ♥︎-1 50
4♠︎nQ♦︎-2 100
Here is a pitfall I often see: we're so used to getting that four-card major response in we don't see the whole picture. North opens 1♦︎ and South shrugs and bids 1♠︎. No real harm done until the day where North has club support and a slam is missed because South decided to bid the major immediately instead of responding 2♣︎ and bidding spades next time. With stronger responding hands that will have more than one chance to bid, try to describe your hand as a whole rather than focussing on majors as we do when the responding hand may only get one chance. (And if you get to 4♠︎ on these cards, you really shouldn't be going down. Pitch a heart loser on the A-K♦︎, then run the J♠︎ and you're home.)
#9 D  NORTH       Aug. 10, 2026
♠︎ J965Dealer: N
♥︎ A94 EW Vul
V  WEST      ♦︎ AK98V  EAST      
♠︎ A♣︎ 97♠︎ Q732
♥︎ KJT86♥︎ Q75
♦︎7532N SOUTH       ♦︎QJT6
♣︎J83♠︎KT84♣︎T2
12♥︎321
9HCP7♦︎44FRK1
12♣︎AKQ6546
Tricks Available (best play by both sides)
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
by
N
9106611by
E
11761
by
S
9106611by
W
11761
Board 10 Results
North-South Pair#NS
%
NS
MP
NS
Score
Contract
& Result
Op.
Ld.
EW
Score
EW
MP
EW
%
Pair# East-West
Francesco L Piccone &
M Piccone
X5N99 6.931401♥︎s+2♣︎J 0.071X5EBarbara Spitz &
Marlee Sheinin
Jacquie Brown &
Alexa Allen
X3N83 5.791102♣︎n+1♠︎2 1.2117X1ECathy Brown &
Ruth Castellino
Eiler Eis &
Bob Hodgkinson
X2N66 4.641003♠︎w–1♦︎5 2.3634X8EDavid Hsu &
Amanda Hill
Pam Tomlins &
Tim Tomlins
X4N50 3.500PASS0 3.5050X3EDonna Bridgeman &
Myrna Halpenny
John Fraser &
Jandi Fraser
X8N34 2.362♠︎w=♣︎2110 4.6466X2ENiamh Kelly &
Doug MacDougall
Joan Christensen &
Carol Linda Ward
X7N9 0.643NTn–2♦︎3200 6.3691X9EGillian Raphael &
Howard Raphael
Diane O Connor &
Valerie Young
X1N9 0.644♥︎s–2♠︎3200 6.3691X6EDoug Stewart &
Louise Forsythe
Section A Scores (three weeks ago)
ContractLeadResultN-S ScoreE-W Score
4♥︎n3♦︎= 620
3♠︎w2♣︎-2 200
2♥︎sJ♣︎+2 170
3♥︎s9♠︎= 140
3♣︎n2♠︎= 110
3♠︎w5♦︎-1 100
East opens 1♦︎ and South decides that shape like this deserves a call, overcalling 1♥︎. West responds 1♠︎, showing a five-card suit (doubling would show four), and North cuebids 2♦︎, showing a decent hand with heart support. East raises to 2♠︎, and South feels safe in competing to 3♥︎. West and North pass and East bids 3♠︎, and everyone passes. Now, you may not agree with the 1♥︎ call, but without it East-West play in 2♠︎ and might make it. North-South can actually make 4♥︎ but are not getting there on 22 combined. In 3♠︎, North-South are looking to get six tricks for the crucial two down vulnerable, beating any partscore they might make in hearts.
#10 V  NORTH       Aug. 10, 2026
♠︎ KT4Dealer: E
♥︎ AJ4 All Vul
V  WEST      ♦︎ J95D  EAST      
♠︎ A9653♣︎ KT42♠︎ Q872
♥︎ Q52♥︎ K8
♦︎T76V SOUTH       ♦︎Q8432
♣︎J9♠︎J♣︎A3
12♥︎T97630
7HCP11♦︎AK2FRK3
10♣︎Q87656
Tricks Available (best play by both sides)
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
by
N
851069by
E
58373
by
S
851069by
W
58373
Board 11 Results
North-South Pair#NS
%
NS
MP
NS
Score
Contract
& Result
Op.
Ld.
EW
Score
EW
MP
EW
%
Pair# East-West
Pam Tomlins &
Tim Tomlins
X4N99 6.934204♠︎n=♥︎9 0.071X2ENiamh Kelly &
Doug MacDougall
Francesco L Piccone &
M Piccone
X5N74 5.214003NTs=♣︎Q 1.7926X4ECurtis Ballard &
Elizabeth Ballard
Eiler Eis &
Bob Hodgkinson
X2N74 5.214003NTs=♣︎8 1.7926X7EDavid Rosenberg &
Alan Atkins
Jacquie Brown &
Alexa Allen
X3N50 3.502102NTs+3♠︎2 3.5050X9EGillian Raphael &
Howard Raphael
Diane O Connor &
Valerie Young
X1N34 2.361703♠︎s+1♦︎T 4.6466X5EBarbara Spitz &
Marlee Sheinin
John Fraser &
Jandi Fraser
X8N17 1.211302♦︎n+2♠︎4 5.7983X1ECathy Brown &
Ruth Castellino
Faye Wightman &
Diane Hardouin
X6N1 0.073♠︎s–1♥︎J50 6.9399X6EDoug Stewart &
Louise Forsythe
Section A Scores (three weeks ago)
ContractLeadResultN-S ScoreE-W Score
3Ns8♣︎= 400
3NsQ♣︎= 400
4♠︎n5♥︎-1 50
4♠︎sT♦︎-1 50
4♠︎sJ♥︎-1 50
4♠︎n6♦︎-1 50
North-South have this auction to themselves, and after South opens 1♣︎ as dealer, North needs a full opener to bid 1♦︎ first, so should probably bid 1♠︎. South raises spades and 4♠︎ is easily reached. If North responds 1♦︎, South rebids 1NT (yes, even with four spades) to show 11-14 balanced. North now admits to a four-card spade suit and a good hand by rebidding 2♠︎. Trouble is, this might get North-South too high. In 4♠︎, which surpringly was beaten every time in Section A, declarer's main aim should be to ruff two clubs in the North hand, winning the red opening suit lead in the North hand and leading a club at trick two. Only one club ruff is required when the A♣︎ appears in the East hand.
#11 N  NORTH       Aug. 10, 2026
♠︎ 9873Dealer: S
♥︎ AT2 None Vul
N  WEST      ♦︎ AQJ52N  EAST      
♠︎ KQ52♣︎ 7♠︎ 4
♥︎ J6♥︎ Q9754
♦︎T3D SOUTH       ♦︎864
♣︎QJ985♠︎AJT6♣︎A643
11♥︎K834
9HCP6♦︎K973FRK4
14♣︎KT20
Tricks Available (best play by both sides)
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
by
N
9108106by
E
43537
by
S
9108106by
W
43537
Board 12 Results
North-South Pair#NS
%
NS
MP
NS
Score
Contract
& Result
Op.
Ld.
EW
Score
EW
MP
EW
%
Pair# East-West
Diane O Connor &
Valerie Young
X1N99 6.931702♦︎n+4♣︎Q 0.071X5EBarbara Spitz &
Marlee Sheinin
Pam Tomlins &
Tim Tomlins
X4N83 5.791503♥︎e–3♦︎A 1.2117X2ENiamh Kelly &
Doug MacDougall
Faye Wightman &
Diane Hardouin
X6N50 3.501102♦︎n+1♣︎Q 3.5050X6EDoug Stewart &
Louise Forsythe
John Fraser &
Jandi Fraser
X8N50 3.501102♦︎n+1♥︎6 3.5050X1ECathy Brown &
Ruth Castellino
Eiler Eis &
Bob Hodgkinson
X2N50 3.501102♠︎s=♥︎7 3.5050X7EDavid Rosenberg &
Alan Atkins
Francesco L Piccone &
M Piccone
X5N17 1.211003♥︎w–2♦︎A 5.7983X4ECurtis Ballard &
Elizabeth Ballard
Jacquie Brown &
Alexa Allen
X3N1 0.07902♦︎n=♠︎A 6.9399X9EGillian Raphael &
Howard Raphael
Section A Scores (three weeks ago)
ContractLeadResultN-S ScoreE-W Score
2♣︎n6♥︎+4 170
3♦︎nQ♥︎+2 150
3♣︎s2♠︎+2 150
3♦︎nQ♥︎+1 130
2♦︎nA♠︎+1 110
2♥︎w3♠︎-1 50
Yet another uncontested auction: North opens 1♦︎ in second seat, and East decides to pass, exhaling when South bids 1♠︎, the risky overcall East was considering. North rebids 2♣︎ and South raises to 3♣︎. North bids 3♦︎ and South takes the plunge and bids 5♣︎. Points schmoints: North is showing a hand with at least ten minor suit cards, and South can envision a crossruff making a lot of tricks. North loses a trump and the A♠︎ and when the K♦︎ falls on the first diamond ruff, it's only a matter of time before the diamonds are set up and North claims eleven tricks. 3NT is possible, but only because the Q♥︎ and A♠︎ are in the East hand where they can be finessed against.
#12 V  NORTH       Aug. 10, 2026
♠︎ 3Dealer: W
♥︎ K2 NS Vul
D  WEST      ♦︎ AJT972N  EAST      
♠︎ 9642♣︎ A753♠︎ AQJ7
♥︎ T9753♥︎ Q86
♦︎K6V SOUTH       ♦︎Q543
♣︎KT♠︎KT85♣︎Q4
12♥︎AJ46
6HCP13♦︎83FRK1
9♣︎J98624
Tricks Available (best play by both sides)
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
by
N
9871011by
E
35621
by
S
9871011by
W
45621
Board 13 Results
North-South Pair#NS
%
NS
MP
NS
Score
Contract
& Result
Op.
Ld.
EW
Score
EW
MP
EW
%
Pair# East-West
Faye Wightman &
Diane Hardouin
X6N50 3.504♠︎s–1♥︎A100 3.5050X5EBarbara Spitz &
Marlee Sheinin
Francesco L Piccone &
M Piccone
X5N50 3.504♠︎s–1♥︎A100 3.5050X3EDonna Bridgeman &
Myrna Halpenny
Joan Christensen &
Carol Linda Ward
X7N50 3.504♠︎s–1♥︎A100 3.5050X7EDavid Rosenberg &
Alan Atkins
Diane O Connor &
Valerie Young
X1N50 3.504♠︎s–1♥︎A100 3.5050X4ECurtis Ballard &
Elizabeth Ballard
Eiler Eis &
Bob Hodgkinson
X2N50 3.504♠︎s–1♥︎A100 3.5050X6EDoug Stewart &
Louise Forsythe
Pam Tomlins &
Tim Tomlins
X4N50 3.503♠︎s–1♥︎3100 3.5050X1ECathy Brown &
Ruth Castellino
Jacquie Brown &
Alexa Allen
X3N50 3.504♠︎s–1♥︎A100 3.5050X8EDavid Hsu &
Amanda Hill
Section A Scores (three weeks ago)
ContractLeadResultN-S ScoreE-W Score
3♠︎nA♦︎+1 170
2♠︎sA♥︎+1 140
4♠︎s8♣︎-1 100
4♠︎sA♥︎-1 100
4♠︎sA♥︎-1 100
4♠︎sA♥︎-1 100
North opens 1♣︎ and South responds 1♠︎. North rebids 1NT, showing a balanced hand of 11-14 ("balanced" guarantees at least two spades), and South has an easy 4♠︎ call. Rewind: North opens 1♣︎ and this time East overcalls 1♥︎. Not a great suit, but a near opener and it's only a one level overcall. Now, though, South's 1♠︎ response promises a five-card suit and North has an easy raise to 2♠︎, even if West raises to 2♥︎ first. South will have no trouble bidding 4♠︎ after this start. Too bad the cards don't behave; East-West have three diamond winners and a heart, and South has no counter-measure if they forget to take them at the start of the hand. Unlucky!
#13 D  NORTH       Aug. 10, 2026
♠︎ J85Dealer: N
♥︎ QT2 All Vul
V  WEST      ♦︎ J73V  EAST      
♠︎ 943♣︎ AKJ6♠︎ 7
♥︎ A873♥︎ K9654
♦︎Q65V SOUTH       ♦︎AK8
♣︎842♠︎AKQT62♣︎QT93
12♥︎J0
6HCP12♦︎T9420FRK4
10♣︎756
Tricks Available (best play by both sides)
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
by
N
89486by
E
54857
by
S
89486by
W
54857
Board 14 Results
North-South Pair#NS
%
NS
MP
NS
Score
Contract
& Result
Op.
Ld.
EW
Score
EW
MP
EW
%
Pair# East-West
Faye Wightman &
Diane Hardouin
X6N99 6.932NTe+3♣︎4210 0.071X5EBarbara Spitz &
Marlee Sheinin
Francesco L Piccone &
M Piccone
X5N74 5.213NTe=♣︎4400 1.7926X3EDonna Bridgeman &
Myrna Halpenny
Joan Christensen &
Carol Linda Ward
X7N74 5.213NTe=♣︎4400 1.7926X7EDavid Rosenberg &
Alan Atkins
Eiler Eis &
Bob Hodgkinson
X2N42 2.934♠︎e=♦︎3420 4.0758X6EDoug Stewart &
Louise Forsythe
Diane O Connor &
Valerie Young
X1N42 2.934♠︎w=♥︎5420 4.0758X4ECurtis Ballard &
Elizabeth Ballard
Pam Tomlins &
Tim Tomlins
X4N17 1.213NTe+1♣︎4430 5.7983X1ECathy Brown &
Ruth Castellino
Jacquie Brown &
Alexa Allen
X3N1 0.074♠︎e+1♣︎4450 6.9399X8EDavid Hsu &
Amanda Hill
Section A Scores (three weeks ago)
ContractLeadResultN-S ScoreE-W Score
3Ne4♣︎+2 460
4♠︎e4♣︎+2 480
4♠︎eT♣︎+2 480
3Ne2♥︎+3 490
3Ne6♥︎+3 490
3NeT♥︎+3 490
A test of East-West's agreements here: East opens 1♣︎, West responds 1♠︎, and East rebids 2NT (18-19 balanced). What West rebids in your system show five spades? Does 3♠︎ promise six? My preference is for simplicity: if you play New Minor Forcing over 1NT, why not over 2NT as well? Bid 3♦︎ to show either five spades or four hearts and let East (who may fit either) decide what to do. With the Q♥︎ onside, 4♠︎ is cold for twelve tricks, three diamond losers in dummy going on two clubs and a third heart winner. But the top score went to three pairs who got three different heart leads against 3NT, making twelve tricks. Why lead a heart from the South hand against 3NT?
#14 N  NORTH       Aug. 10, 2026
♠︎ JTDealer: E
♥︎ Q9753 None Vul
N  WEST      ♦︎ KJ9D  EAST      
♠︎ K8743♣︎ 863♠︎ A95
♥︎ A8♥︎ KJ4
♦︎6542N SOUTH       ♦︎AT8
♣︎A2♠︎Q62♣︎KQJ7
7♥︎T622
11HCP18♦︎Q733FRK0
4♣︎T9540
Tricks Available (best play by both sides)
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
by
N
11421by
E
111291011
by
S
11421by
W
111291011
Board 15 Results
North-South Pair#NS
%
NS
MP
NS
Score
Contract
& Result
Op.
Ld.
EW
Score
EW
MP
EW
%
Pair# East-West
Joan Christensen &
Carol Linda Ward
X7N100 7.006204♥︎s=♣︎3 0.000X6EDoug Stewart &
Louise Forsythe
Faye Wightman &
Diane Hardouin
X6N79 5.506003NTs=♦︎2 1.5021X4ECurtis Ballard &
Elizabeth Ballard
Francesco L Piccone &
M Piccone
X5N79 5.506003NTs=♦︎2 1.5021X2ENiamh Kelly &
Doug MacDougall
Diane O Connor &
Valerie Young
X1N57 4.002302♥︎s+4♣︎9 3.0043X3EDonna Bridgeman &
Myrna Halpenny
Eiler Eis &
Bob Hodgkinson
X2N29 2.001402♠︎s+1♥︎5 5.0071X5EBarbara Spitz &
Marlee Sheinin
Pam Tomlins &
Tim Tomlins
X4N29 2.001402♥︎s+1♦︎2 5.0071X9EGillian Raphael &
Howard Raphael
Jacquie Brown &
Alexa Allen
X3N29 2.001403♥︎s=♣︎3 5.0071X7EDavid Rosenberg &
Alan Atkins
John Fraser &
Jandi Fraser
X8N0 0.004♥︎s–2♦︎2200 7.00100X8EDavid Hsu &
Amanda Hill
Section A Scores (three weeks ago)
ContractLeadResultN-S ScoreE-W Score
3Ns2♦︎= 600
3NnK♦︎= 600
3Nn2♣︎= 600
2♥︎s2♦︎+3 200
2♥︎s3♣︎+3 200
2♥︎s2♦︎+2 170
South opens 1♠︎ and West passes. North has just enough to bid 2♦︎ (ten points required for a two-over-one response), and after East passes, South rebids 2NT, allowing North to raise to 3NT. This might be a more difficult hand in a modern system where even more is required for the 2♦︎ response: North will have to respond 1NT. Now after a 2♥︎ rebid and a 2NT call by North, South will be more wary to bid 3NT since North's initial response might be lighter. The joke is on North-South since everything makes: 3NT, even 4♥︎ on the seven-card fit, even 4♠︎ on the six-card fit! No bidding system can hit the curveball thrown at bidders by the unpredictable distribution of the defenders' cards!
#15 V  NORTH       Aug. 10, 2026
♠︎ 9Dealer: S
♥︎ KQT NS Vul
N  WEST      ♦︎ AT764N  EAST      
♠︎ 642♣︎ J874♠︎ AQ75
♥︎ 965♥︎ J32
♦︎J532D SOUTH       ♦︎KQ8
♣︎Q93♠︎KJT83♣︎T52
10♥︎A8744
3HCP12♦︎90FRK0
15♣︎AK64
Tricks Available (best play by both sides)
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
by
N
91010910by
E
43343
by
S
91010910by
W
43343
Board 16 Results
North-South Pair#NS
%
NS
MP
NS
Score
Contract
& Result
Op.
Ld.
EW
Score
EW
MP
EW
%
Pair# East-West
Eiler Eis &
Bob Hodgkinson
X2N100 7.004204♠︎s=♣︎A 0.000X5EBarbara Spitz &
Marlee Sheinin
Faye Wightman &
Diane Hardouin
X6N64 4.501703♠︎s+1♥︎Q 2.5036X4ECurtis Ballard &
Elizabeth Ballard
Francesco L Piccone &
M Piccone
X5N64 4.501703♠︎s+1♣︎A 2.5036X2ENiamh Kelly &
Doug MacDougall
Joan Christensen &
Carol Linda Ward
X7N64 4.501702♠︎s+2♣︎A 2.5036X6EDoug Stewart &
Louise Forsythe
Diane O Connor &
Valerie Young
X1N64 4.501702♠︎s+2♣︎A 2.5036X3EDonna Bridgeman &
Myrna Halpenny
John Fraser &
Jandi Fraser
X8N29 2.001303♣︎n+1♦︎7 5.0071X8EDavid Hsu &
Amanda Hill
Pam Tomlins &
Tim Tomlins
X4N14 1.001102♠︎s=♣︎A 6.0086X9EGillian Raphael &
Howard Raphael
Jacquie Brown &
Alexa Allen
X3N0 0.002♠︎s–1♣︎A50 7.00100X7EDavid Rosenberg &
Alan Atkins
Section A Scores (three weeks ago)
ContractLeadResultN-S ScoreE-W Score
4♠︎sA♣︎+1 450
4♠︎sK♣︎= 420
4♠︎sA♣︎= 420
2♠︎sK♣︎= 110
4♠︎sK♣︎-1 50
3Ns5♥︎-2 100
Thinking of pre-empting? The first question should always be "what can partner have?" If partner has already passed, the question is mostly answered, go for it. Here, after West opens 1♦︎, North can fire off a random shot with 3♣︎, but the stray bullet is going to hit poor South. The North hand would consider opening 1♣︎ if West had passed, so why not simply bid 2♣︎? Now South can bid 2♠︎ and you get to the 4♠︎ game easily. Over 3♣︎, South might pass and settle for a plus, or try 3NT and take a big loss. Pre-empts when partner is unlimited should be much weaker than this, to avoid such chaos.
#16 N  NORTH       Aug. 10, 2026
♠︎ 762Dealer: W
♥︎ 5 EW Vul
D  WEST      ♦︎ AK4V  EAST      
♠︎ K♣︎ QJT983♠︎ JT95
♥︎ QJT8♥︎ 9763
♦︎Q863N SOUTH       ♦︎J7
♣︎AK75♠︎AQ843♣︎642
10♥︎AK425
15HCP2♦︎T9523FRK1
13♣︎6
Tricks Available (best play by both sides)
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
by
N
7117910by
E
62643
by
S
7117910by
W
32642
Board 17 Results
North-South Pair#NS
%
NS
MP
NS
Score
Contract
& Result
Op.
Ld.
EW
Score
EW
MP
EW
%
Pair# East-West
Francesco L Piccone &
M Piccone
X5N99 6.931504♥︎e–3♠︎A 0.071X1ECathy Brown &
Ruth Castellino
John Fraser &
Jandi Fraser
X8N83 5.791003♥︎e–2♦︎4 1.2117X7EDavid Rosenberg &
Alan Atkins
Pam Tomlins &
Tim Tomlins
X4N66 4.642♣︎s–1♠︎550 2.3634X8EDavid Hsu &
Amanda Hill
Joan Christensen &
Carol Linda Ward
X7N42 2.931NTe=♠︎390 4.0758X5EBarbara Spitz &
Marlee Sheinin
Eiler Eis &
Bob Hodgkinson
X2N42 2.931NTe=♠︎390 4.0758X4ECurtis Ballard &
Elizabeth Ballard
Faye Wightman &
Diane Hardouin
X6N17 1.213NTs–2♥︎K100 5.7983X3EDonna Bridgeman &
Myrna Halpenny
Jacquie Brown &
Alexa Allen
X3N1 0.071♥︎e+1♦︎4110 6.9399X6EDoug Stewart &
Louise Forsythe
Section A Scores (three weeks ago)
ContractLeadResultN-S ScoreE-W Score
3♦︎w*6♠︎-2 300
3Ne4♣︎-3 150
2NeQ♣︎-2 100
1♦︎w*T♣︎-1 100
2♦︎w2♣︎-1 50
2Ne5♣︎= 120
Another uncontested auction beginning with East's second-seat 1♣︎ opener. West responds 1♠︎ and East rebids 1NT, showing 11-14 balanced. West has enough to invite game, and 2NT is the best shot. (2♦︎ would be a New Minor Forcing invite, showing a five-card spade suit, or possibly 4-4 in the majors, and looking for a major suit fit. If you play this useful convention, the drawback is that there is no way to bid diamonds naturally other than a jump to 3♦︎.) 2NT is a struggle with two 11-point hands, of course, and the single club stopper and badly placed outstanding diamonds are lethal to declarer's chances.
#17 D  NORTH       Aug. 10, 2026
♠︎ 62Dealer: N
♥︎ T7 None Vul
N  WEST      ♦︎ KJT85N  EAST      
♠︎ QT95♣︎ KT92♠︎ J74
♥︎ K65♥︎ AQ98
♦︎AQ972N SOUTH       ♦︎63
♣︎6♠︎AK83♣︎A873
7♥︎J4323
11HCP11♦︎44FRK1
11♣︎QJ543
Tricks Available (best play by both sides)
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
by
N
65567by
E
77775
by
S
65567by
W
77875
Board 18 Results
North-South Pair#NS
%
NS
MP
NS
Score
Contract
& Result
Op.
Ld.
EW
Score
EW
MP
EW
%
Pair# East-West
John Fraser &
Jandi Fraser
X8N99 6.931003NTw–2♣︎2 0.071X7EDavid Rosenberg &
Alan Atkins
Joan Christensen &
Carol Linda Ward
X7N83 5.791NTw=♦︎490 1.2117X5EBarbara Spitz &
Marlee Sheinin
Faye Wightman &
Diane Hardouin
X6N42 2.932NTw=♦︎4120 4.0758X3EDonna Bridgeman &
Myrna Halpenny
Francesco L Piccone &
M Piccone
X5N42 2.931NTw+1♦︎4120 4.0758X1ECathy Brown &
Ruth Castellino
Eiler Eis &
Bob Hodgkinson
X2N42 2.931NTw+1♦︎4120 4.0758X4ECurtis Ballard &
Elizabeth Ballard
Pam Tomlins &
Tim Tomlins
X4N42 2.931NTw+1♦︎4120 4.0758X8EDavid Hsu &
Amanda Hill
Jacquie Brown &
Alexa Allen
X3N1 0.072♥︎w+1♦︎4140 6.9399X6EDoug Stewart &
Louise Forsythe
Section A Scores (three weeks ago)
ContractLeadResultN-S ScoreE-W Score
3Nw4♦︎-1 50
1Nw4♦︎= 90
1Nw6♣︎= 90
1Nw4♦︎+1 120
1NwQ♥︎+1 120
1Nw4♦︎+2 150
One bid in this auction: 1NT by West, should make eight tricks. Living in Vancouver I have learned (often by selling entries and seeing reactions!) that the number eight is universally lucky in Chinese folklore, so this deal, where somehow East or West can make eight tricks in notrump, spades, hearts, diamonds, and clubs, should be super lucky! Even if North waits to capture the K♦︎ with the ace, holding declarer to two diamond tricks, the countermove is to play on spades and set up an eighth trick with the fourth round of spades. Most hands where no eight-card fit exists favour the defenders; this one is a remarkable exception to the rule!
#18 V  NORTH       Aug. 10, 2026
♠︎ KJ5Dealer: E
♥︎ Q6 NS Vul
N  WEST      ♦︎ AT84D  EAST      
♠︎ A84♣︎ 9652♠︎ T732
♥︎ AJ75♥︎ 432
♦︎K2V SOUTH       ♦︎QJ63
♣︎KQ84♠︎Q96♣︎A7
10♥︎KT981
17HCP7♦︎9751FRK1
6♣︎JT30
Tricks Available (best play by both sides)
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
by
N
55455by
E
88888
by
S
55455by
W
88888

Work In Progress! This HTML page with results combines the ACBLscore results, the BridgeMate data, and the actual cards in each hand to make a page that displays nicely on most screens. I'll continue to develop it as I hear about problems from people. So far I have only really had time to test it on the large monitor I have at home. I've done a little bit of work in making it fit on my iPhone 15 screen (turned sideways), but the typical cellphone screen is not wide enough to display the hands alongside the results, so it relocates the hands below the results and you may need to scroll down a bit. The key is in the tabs at the top, which mean you don't need to scroll to get from results to Board 32! Just click or tap on what you want to see next!

Two things that may help: If your browser program is old, some of the tech in this page might not work 100%: the system of tabs at the top of the page requires a recent version. You really aren't doing your computer many favours if you avoid requests to upgrade the programs you use most often, like browsers. If the page works but there are large areas of a monitor unused, you might be able to make it more readable by adjusting the size of things with CTRL + (plus key), which upsizes text and other screen elements a bit. CTRL + (minus key) also works if you go too far, and CTRL + (zero) resets to the default. (This doesn't work on cellphone screens.)

How is a pair's matchpoint score on a board calculated? Your raw score is compared one by one with all of the other raw scores on the board made by pairs sitting in your direction. You get one matchpoint for each score you beat, and a half-point for each score that is the same as yours. The top score on a board is one less than the number of times it is played. If the board was not played as many times as other boards for some reason, the scores may be factored up to compensate, so that each board has the same top score.

How is a pair's total score calculated? The scoring program first checks all boards to see how many times they have been played. Usually this will be the same for all boards, but if there is a sitout or a glitch of some sort in the movement, or an artificially assigned score due to an irregularity, the scoring program must first FACTOR scores on boards played fewer times, so that the top score on every board is the same. Once that is done, the scoring program also checks to see that each pair played the same number of boards: some may have sat out and missed a round: these pairs will have their total matchpoints FACTORED so that they get matchpoints for the boards they missed, based on their percentage on the boards they did play. The total of all this summing and factoring is your final score.

How does this factoring work exactly? There are actually two types of factoring: the most common is to factor a pair's score that has not played as many boards as the other pairs. Their sum of matchpoints on the boards they played, is divided by the number of boards they played, and then multiplied by the number of boards most pairs played. The other type is covered in the next question.

I have the best score on a board but got slightly fewer matchpoints than tops on other boards, why is that? This is the other type of factoring, which happens when a board is played fewer times than other boards for some reason. Maybe a pair didn't get to it, or there was a artificial score assigned after an irregularity. Factoring a board has to take into account the small chance that, had it been played the correct number of times, the extra plays might have produced a score that is better than the current top, or lower than the current bottom. To do so, the ACBL and the World Bridge Federation use the Neuberg formula, which you can read about on Wikipedia if you want the complete details. It has its detractors, but is sort of like Winston Churchill's ranking of democracy as the second-worst system of government ... all the others being tied for first!

HCP and FRK, what on earth are they? HCP stands for highcard points, and the four numbers surrounding it show how many points each player has in a hand. The colour behind the word "HCP" is gray when the 40 points are evenly distributed between North-South and East-West, but turns more and more orange (North-South) or purple (East-West) if one side has a majority. FRK stands for Freakness, a way to describe just how freaky a hand's distribution is, on a scale from 0-20, with average for a hand being just slightly less than 3, and the average for a full deal, the sum of the freakness ratings of the four hands, is about 11.93 on average. A hand gets one freakness point for each card in a suit beyond the fourth, or less than three; plus a bonus if the hand contains at least one void (2 points) or at least one singleton but no void (1 point). The background colour behind the "FRK" shows whether the deal is hot (red), average (gray), or cold (blue) in terms of Freakness! Freakness was created by bridge expert Richard Pavlicek and searching for "pavlicek freakness" will get you quickly to his article on the subject.

Something New! The tabs with the board numbers now indicate which side had the bulk of the high-card points (above the board number: NS: orange, EW: purple, evenly-split: gray), and the freakness rating of the deal as a whole (below the board number: flat: blue, average: gray, freaky: red)! Want to see only the hands where N-S had the points, or the freakiest ones? Check the tabs!

What are "tricks available" and how are they calculated? Computers these days can analyze all the possible legal play lines on a deal, given a trump suit (or notrump) and a declarer, and sort all of these lines into successes and failures to come up with an optimum line of play that perfect defenders and a perfect declarer would take. The result of this line of play is the "tricks available" and is sometimes unrealistic, requiring opening leads that few if any would find, or declarer taking only the finesses that work and dropping offside singleton honours where possible. You will very quickly see from the results which deals have unrealistic "tricks available" expectations, and it is often a fun exercise to work out how you can make that many tricks. But for most deals, it is a fairly good guide as to how high a pair should bid.

Why are the masterpoints not the same as what is on ACBL Live for Clubs? This is in my view an own goal by ACBL: they have new rules for club game masterpoints but are not willing to expend the time to upgrade ACBLscore to show the masterpoints under the new rules. Luckily, most masterpoint awards actually get bigger when they go through the "engine" and are reposted on Live. The main effect is to give more masterpoints to games where the non-sitting out pairs play more boards. The problem is that the masterpoint awards that come out of ACBLscore, before being posted online, are not what you eventually get.

How can I contact McBruce to tell him what's not working for me? By e-mail: oogashawca@gmail.com (the old shaw.ca address is gone)