VanLearners Section X Monday Evening August 24, 2026

Results for Section X, North-South
Pair#PercentScoreRankMPtsPlayers
X5N 68.57% 41.1410.36Eiler Eis - Bob Hodgkinson
X6N 64.67% 38.8020.25Joan Christensen - Carol Linda Ward
X4N 50.08% 30.05Pam Tomlins - Tim Tomlins
X3N 44.63% 26.78Alexa Allen - Jacquie Brown
X1N 43.58% 26.15Diane O Connor - Seann Caldwell
X2N 28.98% 17.39John Fraser - Linda Collins
North-South had 53.02% of the highcard points in today's deals.
The average freakness rating of today's deals (measuring the amount of distribution in the dealset as a whole) was 11.79, close to the average of about 11.93.
Results for Section X, East-West
Pair#PercentScoreRankMPtsPlayers
X3E 64.88% 38.9310.36Francesco L Piccone - M Piccone
X2E 56.35% 33.8120.25Barbara Spitz - Marlee Sheinin
X6E 44.65% 26.79David Rosenberg - Alan Atkins
X4E 43.62% 26.17Mike Bow - Kelly Anderson
X5E 40.92% 24.55Vicki Torbett - Myrna Halpenny
North-South had 53.02% of the highcard points in today's deals.
The average freakness rating of today's deals (measuring the amount of distribution in the dealset as a whole) was 11.79, close to the average of about 11.93.
Board 1 Results
North-South Pair#NS
%
NS
MP
NS
Score
Contract
& Result
Op.
Ld.
EW
Score
EW
MP
EW
%
Pair# East-West
Joan Christensen &
Carol Linda Ward
X6N97 3.884603NTs+2♣︎6 0.123X5EVicki Torbett &
Myrna Halpenny
Alexa Allen &
Jacquie Brown
X3N66 2.624005♦︎n=♣︎3 1.3834X4EMike Bow &
Kelly Anderson
Eiler Eis &
Bob Hodgkinson
X5N34 1.381703♦︎n+3♣︎3 2.6266X3EFrancesco L Piccone &
M Piccone
Pam Tomlins &
Tim Tomlins
X4N3 0.121503♦︎n+2♥︎4 3.8897X6EDavid Rosenberg &
Alan Atkins
Section A Scores (three weeks ago)
ContractLeadResultN-S ScoreE-W Score
3Nn3♣︎+2 460
3Nn4♥︎+1 430
3NsK♥︎+1 430
5♦︎n3♣︎+1 420
5♦︎n3♣︎+1 420
4♦︎n4♥︎+2 170
North opens 1♦︎, East passes and South responds 1♠︎. West bids 1NT and North asks East what the partnership agreement is. East says that they have several ways in this auction to show the other two suits: double, 1NT, and 2NT; 1NT shows four hearts and five clubs. North chooses to bid 2♣︎ anyhow to complete the description of the North hand. East passes and South bids 2♥︎, cuebidding the suit West is supposed to have. West passes and North has more than enough for a jump to 3NT. East leads a heart and this sets up three heart winners for East-West, but North has ten winners: the A♥︎, five diamonds, three spades, and the A♣︎, to cash first.
#1 D  NORTH       Aug. 24, 2026
♠︎ 3Dealer: N
♥︎ A2 None Vul
N  WEST      ♦︎ AQ965N  EAST      
♠︎ J82♣︎ AJT74♠︎ T9654
♥︎ KQT7♥︎ J864
♦︎JN SOUTH       ♦︎T83
♣︎KQ962♠︎AKQ7♣︎3
15♥︎9536
12HCP1♦︎K7424FRK4
12♣︎851
Tricks Available (best play by both sides)
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
by
N
10871210by
E
14612
by
S
10871210by
W
14612
Board 2 Results
North-South Pair#NS
%
NS
MP
NS
Score
Contract
& Result
Op.
Ld.
EW
Score
EW
MP
EW
%
Pair# East-West
Pam Tomlins &
Tim Tomlins
X4N97 3.881702♥︎n+2♣︎A 0.123X6EDavid Rosenberg &
Alan Atkins
Eiler Eis &
Bob Hodgkinson
X5N34 1.381002♠︎e–2♦︎4 2.6266X3EFrancesco L Piccone &
M Piccone
Joan Christensen &
Carol Linda Ward
X6N34 1.381001NTw–2♥︎A 2.6266X5EVicki Torbett &
Myrna Halpenny
Alexa Allen &
Jacquie Brown
X3N34 1.381001NTw–2♥︎A 2.6266X4EMike Bow &
Kelly Anderson
Section A Scores (three weeks ago)
ContractLeadResultN-S ScoreE-W Score
2NwK♥︎-3 150
1Nw6♥︎-3 150
2♠︎eK♣︎-3 150
1NnA♣︎+2 150
2♠︎eK♣︎-2 100
1Nw2♦︎-1 50
East opens 1♠︎ and West responds 1NT; everyone passes and West struggles for 13 tricks, of which poor West might get only three spades and the A♣︎ against this diabolical layout. Unlucky, but why did Section A avoid this fate at most tables? In modern systems, the 1NT response is forcing for one round and East must find a rebid: 2♠︎ is out since that promises a six-card suit, so 2♦︎ is the least worst rebid (2NT shows extras). West corrects to 2♠︎ as a signoff and it's a little better, only down two for 100, against the 110 in hearts or 120 in notrump North-South can make if they bid. This "forcing notrump" helps in game and slam bidding and here improves the partscore slightly.
#2 V  NORTH       Aug. 24, 2026
♠︎ T963Dealer: E
♥︎ AK76 NS Vul
N  WEST      ♦︎ AQT2D  EAST      
♠︎ K5♣︎ 4♠︎ AQ872
♥︎ 954♥︎ J32
♦︎K63V SOUTH       ♦︎J87
♣︎98632♠︎J4♣︎AJ
13♥︎QT83
6HCP13♦︎9542FRK2
8♣︎KQT752
Tricks Available (best play by both sides)
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
by
N
87878by
E
46454
by
S
87878by
W
46454
Board 3 Results
North-South Pair#NS
%
NS
MP
NS
Score
Contract
& Result
Op.
Ld.
EW
Score
EW
MP
EW
%
Pair# East-West
Joan Christensen &
Carol Linda Ward
X6N97 3.884♠︎n–2♥︎A100 0.123X5EVicki Torbett &
Myrna Halpenny
Eiler Eis &
Bob Hodgkinson
X5N66 2.623♥︎e+2♠︎3200 1.3834X3EFrancesco L Piccone &
M Piccone
Alexa Allen &
Jacquie Brown
X3N34 1.382♥︎w+4♠︎A230 2.6266X4EMike Bow &
Kelly Anderson
Pam Tomlins &
Tim Tomlins
X4N3 0.124♥︎e+2♠︎7680 3.8897X6EDavid Rosenberg &
Alan Atkins
Section A Scores (three weeks ago)
ContractLeadResultN-S ScoreE-W Score
3♠︎nA♣︎-1 50
3♠︎nA♣︎-1 50
3♠︎nA♣︎-1 50
4♠︎nA♥︎-2 100
3♥︎eT♣︎+3 230
5♠︎n*2♥︎-3 500
South passes, West opens 1♣︎, and North overcalls 1♠︎. East correctly judges that a bid of 2♥︎ would show more than a nine-count, so instead makes a negative double to show hearts. South, noting the favourable vulnerability, jumps to 3♠︎ pre-emptively. West has an easy 4♥︎ call, but North bids 4♠︎. East too has extras, having shown only a four-card heart suit originally, and competes to 5♥︎. This is passed out and surprise: East-West with 22 combined points are making twelve tricks easily: ruff the second spade in hand, pull trumps in two rounds, and pitch a diamond on the fifth club so you can ruff the losers in dummy! Can't bid slam, but well done to bid to the high-scoring vulnerable game.
#3 N  NORTH       Aug. 24, 2026
♠︎ AKQ654Dealer: S
♥︎ QT EW Vul
V  WEST      ♦︎ KT5V  EAST      
♠︎ 2♣︎ 97♠︎ 98
♥︎ K865♥︎ A9732
♦︎AJ7D SOUTH       ♦︎42
♣︎KQ632♠︎JT73♣︎AJ84
14♥︎J44
13HCP9♦︎Q98634FRK3
4♣︎T53
Tricks Available (best play by both sides)
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
by
N
28171by
E
7512511
by
S
28171by
W
7512511
Board 4 Results
North-South Pair#NS
%
NS
MP
NS
Score
Contract
& Result
Op.
Ld.
EW
Score
EW
MP
EW
%
Pair# East-West
Pam Tomlins &
Tim Tomlins
X4N66 2.621304♦︎n=♠︎A 1.3834X5EVicki Torbett &
Myrna Halpenny
Joan Christensen &
Carol Linda Ward
X6N66 2.621303♦︎n+1♥︎J 1.3834X4EMike Bow &
Kelly Anderson
John Fraser &
Linda Collins
X2N66 2.621303♦︎n+1♥︎4 1.3834X2EBarbara Spitz &
Marlee Sheinin
Diane O Connor &
Seann Caldwell
X1N3 0.121102♥︎s=♦︎2 3.8897X6EDavid Rosenberg &
Alan Atkins
Section A Scores (three weeks ago)
ContractLeadResultN-S ScoreE-W Score
3Ns3♠︎= 600
3Ns3♠︎= 600
4♠︎wA♦︎-4 400
3Ns3♠︎-2 200
3Ns3♠︎-2 200
3Ns2♠︎-2 200
West passes, North opens 1♦︎, and East makes a takeout double. South's redouble says "partner, it's our hand, bid normally and don't get in the way; I'll know what to do when it gets back around to me." West bids 1♠︎ and North gets in the way, with a bid of 3♦︎. East passes and South has to bid 3NT and hope it is right. West leads a fourth-best spade and East needs really to be in the zone to see that the most important card in the East hand is going to be .... the 5♠︎!!! East wins the A♠︎, returns the 8♠︎ to the ace, and follows to the third spade with the ten. South wins, takes the losing diamond finesse ... and East now leads the brilliantly-preserved 5♠︎ to West's six to cash one more spade!
#4 V  NORTH       Aug. 24, 2026
♠︎ 7Dealer: W
♥︎ K5 All Vul
D  WEST      ♦︎ AKJ9843V  EAST      
♠︎ K6432♣︎ 875♠︎ AT85
♥︎ 962♥︎ JT74
♦︎62V SOUTH       ♦︎Q75
♣︎963♠︎QJ9♣︎AQ
11♥︎AQ837
3HCP13♦︎T2FRK1
13♣︎KJT424
Tricks Available (best play by both sides)
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
by
N
8791010by
E
46422
by
S
8791010by
W
36422
Board 5 Results
North-South Pair#NS
%
NS
MP
NS
Score
Contract
& Result
Op.
Ld.
EW
Score
EW
MP
EW
%
Pair# East-West
Pam Tomlins &
Tim Tomlins
X4N97 3.886005♦︎n=♠︎8 0.123X5EVicki Torbett &
Myrna Halpenny
Diane O Connor &
Seann Caldwell
X1N66 2.621304♦︎n=♠︎A 1.3834X6EDavid Rosenberg &
Alan Atkins
Joan Christensen &
Carol Linda Ward
X6N34 1.381004♠︎e–2♥︎A 2.6266X4EMike Bow &
Kelly Anderson
John Fraser &
Linda Collins
X2N3 0.125♦︎s–2♥︎Q200 3.8897X2EBarbara Spitz &
Marlee Sheinin
Section A Scores (three weeks ago)
ContractLeadResultN-S ScoreE-W Score
4♦︎n*A♠︎= 710
4♠︎e*A♥︎-2 300
4♦︎n8♥︎+1 150
4♠︎e6♦︎-2 100
4♥︎w2♠︎-2 100
2♠︎e5♦︎= 110
North at this vulnerability should be a bit conservative and open 2♦︎, not 3♦︎. Seven-card suits are usually three-bids, but this one isn't that great, and weak 2♦︎ is a more variable animal that 2♥︎ or 2♠︎ in first or second seat. East passes and South raises to 3♦︎, leaving it up to West, whose options are pass, 3♥︎, and double. Passing and defending 3♦︎ may be best, especially if South has a good hand. But East likely has something on this auction and 3♥︎ might work out. Double might be risky if East bids a four-card spade suit. West bids 3♠︎ and East wisely passes. Down one for -50 beats -110 for letting them play and make 3♦︎! 
#5 D  NORTH       Aug. 24, 2026
♠︎ 2Dealer: N
♥︎ 73 NS Vul
N  WEST      ♦︎ KJ98764N  EAST      
♠︎ 654♣︎ KT2♠︎ AJT873
♥︎ QJ542♥︎ 86
♦︎A3V SOUTH       ♦︎2
♣︎AQ3♠︎KQ9♣︎J754
7♥︎AKT97
13HCP6♦︎QT52FRK6
14♣︎9860
Tricks Available (best play by both sides)
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
by
N
85596by
E
48737
by
S
85596by
W
48737
Board 6 Results
North-South Pair#NS
%
NS
MP
NS
Score
Contract
& Result
Op.
Ld.
EW
Score
EW
MP
EW
%
Pair# East-West
Joan Christensen &
Carol Linda Ward
X6N81 3.251101♠︎s+1♦︎K 0.7519X4EMike Bow &
Kelly Anderson
Diane O Connor &
Seann Caldwell
X1N81 3.251101♠︎s+1♦︎K 0.7519X6EDavid Rosenberg &
Alan Atkins
John Fraser &
Linda Collins
X2N34 1.382♦︎w=♥︎290 2.6266X2EBarbara Spitz &
Marlee Sheinin
Pam Tomlins &
Tim Tomlins
X4N3 0.123♦︎w=♠︎A110 3.8897X5EVicki Torbett &
Myrna Halpenny
Section A Scores (three weeks ago)
ContractLeadResultN-S ScoreE-W Score
2♠︎sK♦︎= 110
2♠︎sK♦︎= 110
2♠︎sK♦︎= 110
2♦︎wA♠︎-1 100
3♠︎sK♦︎-1 50
3♦︎wA♠︎= 110
East passes, South opens 1♠︎, and West overcalls 2♦︎. North makes a feather-light negative double (at least West has four cards in both unbid suits), and East raises to 3♦︎, ending the auction. North leads the A♠︎ and a second spade, won in dummy. Declarer calls for a diamond and South wins the ace. South switches to the A♥︎ and a second heart, getting a heart ruff on the third round, but West ruffs high when a third spade is returned and down one is the best they can do. "If I lead a heart to the ace and you lead one back, can we get TWO heart ruffs?" asks North excitedly. "Yes," says South, "but one of them would be with the ace of trumps, so no difference."
#6 N  NORTH       Aug. 24, 2026
♠︎ ATDealer: E
♥︎ K842 EW Vul
V  WEST      ♦︎ 743D  EAST      
♠︎ J4♣︎ J875♠︎ KQ7
♥︎ J95♥︎ QT73
♦︎KQ982N SOUTH       ♦︎JT5
♣︎AQ2♠︎986532♣︎943
8♥︎A61
13HCP8♦︎A62FRK0
11♣︎KT64
Tricks Available (best play by both sides)
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
by
N
68657by
E
75785
by
S
68657by
W
75785
Board 7 Results
North-South Pair#NS
%
NS
MP
NS
Score
Contract
& Result
Op.
Ld.
EW
Score
EW
MP
EW
%
Pair# East-West
Alexa Allen &
Jacquie Brown
X3N97 3.886805♠︎s+1♣︎3 0.123X3EFrancesco L Piccone &
M Piccone
Joan Christensen &
Carol Linda Ward
X6N66 2.626504♠︎s+1♥︎2 1.3834X2EBarbara Spitz &
Marlee Sheinin
Eiler Eis &
Bob Hodgkinson
X5N19 0.756405♣︎n+2♥︎7 3.2581X6EDavid Rosenberg &
Alan Atkins
Diane O Connor &
Seann Caldwell
X1N19 0.756405♣︎n+2♥︎7 3.2581X5EVicki Torbett &
Myrna Halpenny
Section A Scores (three weeks ago)
ContractLeadResultN-S ScoreE-W Score
7♣︎n7♥︎= 2140
6Ns2♥︎+1 1470
6♣︎n2♣︎+1 1390
6♣︎nT♦︎= 1370
5♣︎nJ♥︎+1 620
6♦︎s8♥︎-1 100
Just as North is wondering whether to open 2♣︎, South opens 2♣︎!! North eventually uses Blackwood to find out that partner has one ace and only three kings for the 2♣︎ opener, and with no way to discover which king is missing, North passes the 6♠︎ response showing three kings. Too bad, South has the singleton K♣︎ and thirteen tricks in notrump are there, but you have to be careful with entries. If East leads a spade against 7NT, North cashes three spades, the A♦︎, the K♣︎, the KQJ♦︎ (and two more if North wishes), then crosses to the A♥︎ to run the rest of the clubs. If South has the K♥︎ instead of the K♣︎, there might be a squeeze for a 13th trick. Two 2♣︎ openers shouldn't stop at the six level!!
#7 V  NORTH       Aug. 24, 2026
♠︎ Dealer: S
♥︎ AQ53 All Vul
V  WEST      ♦︎ AV  EAST      
♠︎ T97♣︎ AQT98654♠︎ J843
♥︎ 8642♥︎ KJ97
♦︎853D SOUTH       ♦︎T974
♣︎J73♠︎AKQ652♣︎2
16♥︎T11
1HCP5♦︎KQJ620FRK3
18♣︎K8
Tricks Available (best play by both sides)
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
by
N
1312101213by
E
01300
by
S
1312101213by
W
01300
Board 8 Results
North-South Pair#NS
%
NS
MP
NS
Score
Contract
& Result
Op.
Ld.
EW
Score
EW
MP
EW
%
Pair# East-West
Eiler Eis &
Bob Hodgkinson
X5N81 3.252002♠︎s+3♦︎2 0.7519X6EDavid Rosenberg &
Alan Atkins
Diane O Connor &
Seann Caldwell
X1N81 3.252002♠︎s+3♥︎8 0.7519X5EVicki Torbett &
Myrna Halpenny
Joan Christensen &
Carol Linda Ward
X6N34 1.381402♠︎s+1♦︎2 2.6266X2EBarbara Spitz &
Marlee Sheinin
Alexa Allen &
Jacquie Brown
X3N3 0.123♦︎e=♥︎A110 3.8897X3EFrancesco L Piccone &
M Piccone
Section A Scores (three weeks ago)
ContractLeadResultN-S ScoreE-W Score
4♠︎s2♦︎+1 450
4♠︎s4♦︎+1 450
3♠︎s2♦︎+2 200
2♠︎s5♥︎+2 170
2♠︎sJ♦︎+2 170
3♥︎nK♦︎= 140
If I had the East hand with the 2♦︎ instead of the K♦︎, I would still open 2♦︎ in third seat non-vulnerable! South doubles the weak two opener, and West passes. North bids 2♥︎, and East passes. South's 2♠︎ rebid after an initial takeout double is a message-changer announcing instead a strong overcall in spades. West comes in with 3♦︎, but North cuebids 4♦︎, and 4♠︎ is reached easily. Not much the defenders can do about it, they'll win the offside K♠︎, the A♣︎, and a heart. The takeout double, followed next round by a new suit from the doubler, is a rarity in bidding: changing the message conveyed previously. South's 2♠︎ here cancels the original implication of support for all unbid suits.
#8 N  NORTH       Aug. 24, 2026
♠︎ T42Dealer: W
♥︎ QT972 None Vul
D  WEST      ♦︎ A83N  EAST      
♠︎ K86♣︎ Q2♠︎ 75
♥︎ J865♥︎ K3
♦︎J42N SOUTH       ♦︎KQT976
♣︎A97♠︎AQJ93♣︎T64
8♥︎A42
9HCP8♦︎50FRK4
15♣︎KJ8536
Tricks Available (best play by both sides)
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
by
N
810959by
E
43473
by
S
8109610by
W
43473
Board 9 Results
North-South Pair#NS
%
NS
MP
NS
Score
Contract
& Result
Op.
Ld.
EW
Score
EW
MP
EW
%
Pair# East-West
Eiler Eis &
Bob Hodgkinson
X5N97 3.881004♠︎w–1♥︎A 0.123X6EDavid Rosenberg &
Alan Atkins
Joan Christensen &
Carol Linda Ward
X6N66 2.62901NTn=♣︎T 1.3834X2EBarbara Spitz &
Marlee Sheinin
Alexa Allen &
Jacquie Brown
X3N34 1.383♠︎w=♥︎3140 2.6266X3EFrancesco L Piccone &
M Piccone
Diane O Connor &
Seann Caldwell
X1N3 0.124♥︎n–3♠︎A150 3.8897X5EVicki Torbett &
Myrna Halpenny
Section A Scores (three weeks ago)
ContractLeadResultN-S ScoreE-W Score
4♠︎w*2♠︎-1 200
1Nn4♣︎+2 150
3♣︎eJ♠︎-1 100
4♥︎nA♠︎-3 150
3♠︎w6♠︎+1 170
2♠︎wA♣︎+2 170
North opens 1NT and everyone passes. East leads a fourth best club and declarer wins and plays a low heart towards dummy. East grabs the king and has to work out what to do next. Hearts are out, and clubs seem unlikely, but a diamond lead might be headed into declarer's AQx♦︎, and a spade lead might kill partner's Q♠︎ if declarer has KT97♠︎. We can see from the diagram what works and what doesn't but poor East has no way of telling. One clue I see given often by newer players is looking at dummy in horror when there is an unstopped suit in notrump. If East sees that clue, it's easy to work out that the weak suit is most likely spades. So be positive and fearlessly confident! It sometimes pays!
#9 D  NORTH       Aug. 24, 2026
♠︎ 62Dealer: N
♥︎ AJ932 EW Vul
V  WEST      ♦︎ AJ2V  EAST      
♠︎ KQT975♣︎ AJ6♠︎ A43
♥︎ 754♥︎ KT
♦︎Q5N SOUTH       ♦︎K73
♣︎32♠︎J8♣︎KT987
15♥︎Q862
7HCP13♦︎T98644FRK2
5♣︎Q542
Tricks Available (best play by both sides)
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
by
N
53775by
E
710558
by
S
53775by
W
710568
Board 10 Results
North-South Pair#NS
%
NS
MP
NS
Score
Contract
& Result
Op.
Ld.
EW
Score
EW
MP
EW
%
Pair# East-West
John Fraser &
Linda Collins
X2N97 3.882005♣︎w–2♦︎J 0.123X6EDavid Rosenberg &
Alan Atkins
Pam Tomlins &
Tim Tomlins
X4N66 2.621003♥︎w–1♣︎9 1.3834X4EMike Bow &
Kelly Anderson
Alexa Allen &
Jacquie Brown
X3N34 1.383♥︎w=♣︎9140 2.6266X2EBarbara Spitz &
Marlee Sheinin
Diane O Connor &
Seann Caldwell
X1N3 0.124♠︎n–2♣︎2200 3.8897X3EFrancesco L Piccone &
M Piccone
Section A Scores (three weeks ago)
ContractLeadResultN-S ScoreE-W Score
3♠︎nK♥︎+1 170
3♥︎w9♣︎+1 170
4♥︎w9♣︎= 620
4♥︎w9♣︎= 620
4♥︎w9♣︎= 620
4♥︎w*9♣︎= 790
East opens 1♣︎, South passes, West responds 1♥︎, and North gets into the auction with a jump to 2♠︎. Wait, what? With 13 points and six spades North is pre-empting? Yes: remember, South has already passed and both opponents may have good hands. With any long suit you should consider a jump in this spot. The 1♠︎ non-jump overcall can be on five-card or even good four-card suits that you'd like partner to consider leading. East has no trouble bidding 3♥︎ over 2♠︎ and West isn't going anywhere with only seven points. Both sides can make ten tricks in their suits here, but neither would want to be there. (Section A's East-West pairs appear to be more confident than I am here.)
#10 V  NORTH       Aug. 24, 2026
♠︎ AJ8743Dealer: E
♥︎ A96 All Vul
V  WEST      ♦︎ A92D  EAST      
♠︎ T2♣︎ 9♠︎ K
♥︎ T874♥︎ KQJ2
♦︎K83V SOUTH       ♦︎Q54
♣︎AT86♠︎Q965♣︎KQ752
13♥︎535
7HCP16♦︎JT761FRK4
4♣︎J431
Tricks Available (best play by both sides)
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
by
N
810374by
E
531069
by
S
810374by
W
531069
Board 11 Results
North-South Pair#NS
%
NS
MP
NS
Score
Contract
& Result
Op.
Ld.
EW
Score
EW
MP
EW
%
Pair# East-West
Pam Tomlins &
Tim Tomlins
X4N97 3.881201NTn+1♠︎5 0.123X4EMike Bow &
Kelly Anderson
Diane O Connor &
Seann Caldwell
X1N66 2.621002NTe–2♦︎2 1.3834X3EFrancesco L Piccone &
M Piccone
Alexa Allen &
Jacquie Brown
X3N34 1.38503♣︎w–1♦︎3 2.6266X2EBarbara Spitz &
Marlee Sheinin
John Fraser &
Linda Collins
X2N3 0.122♦︎s–2♥︎8100 3.8897X6EDavid Rosenberg &
Alan Atkins
Section A Scores (three weeks ago)
ContractLeadResultN-S ScoreE-W Score
4♣︎w3♦︎-2 100
3♣︎w3♦︎-1 50
3♣︎w3♦︎-1 50
1NeK♥︎-1 50
1Nn5♥︎-2 100
3♦︎s8♥︎-2 100
South opens 1♦︎, West passes, and North responds 1NT. East doubles, which is a takeout double of diamonds. South wisely passes to show a minimum opener and West bids 2♣︎. North raises to 2♦︎ and East doubles again, signalling a wish to compete further. South passes and West persists with 3♣︎, rather than hoping a three-card spade suit is sufficient. North and East pass and South bids 3♦︎, ending the auction. Both pairs make only eight tricks in their eight-card minor suit fits, so whoever defends will likely score well here, unless they can stay at the two level.
#11 N  NORTH       Aug. 24, 2026
♠︎ T32Dealer: S
♥︎ 963 None Vul
N  WEST      ♦︎ J753N  EAST      
♠︎ 974♣︎ AJ7♠︎ KQ85
♥︎ 82♥︎ QT75
♦︎KQ9D SOUTH       ♦︎A8
♣︎T6542♠︎AJ6♣︎KQ9
6♥︎AKJ40
5HCP16♦︎T6422FRK1
13♣︎831
Tricks Available (best play by both sides)
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
by
N
66785by
E
77658
by
S
56785by
W
77658
Board 12 Results
North-South Pair#NS
%
NS
MP
NS
Score
Contract
& Result
Op.
Ld.
EW
Score
EW
MP
EW
%
Pair# East-West
Pam Tomlins &
Tim Tomlins
X4N81 3.252♠︎e+2♥︎7170 0.7519X4EMike Bow &
Kelly Anderson
John Fraser &
Linda Collins
X2N81 3.253♠︎e+1♣︎Q170 0.7519X6EDavid Rosenberg &
Alan Atkins
Alexa Allen &
Jacquie Brown
X3N34 1.382♠︎e+3♥︎K200 2.6266X2EBarbara Spitz &
Marlee Sheinin
Diane O Connor &
Seann Caldwell
X1N3 0.124♠︎e=♣︎T420 3.8897X3EFrancesco L Piccone &
M Piccone
Section A Scores (three weeks ago)
ContractLeadResultN-S ScoreE-W Score
3♠︎e4♠︎= 140
3♠︎eQ♣︎= 140
2♠︎eK♥︎+1 140
1Nw6♣︎+2 150
2♠︎eQ♣︎+2 170
3♠︎e7♠︎+1 170
West and North pass and East opens 1♠︎ in third seat. South passes and West would love to be in 4♠︎ opposite any first or second seat 1♠︎ opener, but is concerned that this one in third seat might be a bit light. There's a convention for that, invented in Canada by a Canadian seventy years ago! 2♣︎ shows a decent hand and promises an eight-card fit or better, but asks opener to bid 2♠︎ with a light opener, passed for survival! East instead bids 2NT, denying a light opener and denying a side red suit. West bids 3♠︎ as a final invite and East bids game. There's no way to get North in for a killing heart lead, so ten tricks are possible with perfect declarer play!
#12 V  NORTH       Aug. 24, 2026
♠︎ J5Dealer: W
♥︎ 86 NS Vul
D  WEST      ♦︎ J97N  EAST      
♠︎ K93♣︎ K87642♠︎ AQ862
♥︎ J542♥︎ AT9
♦︎KQT4V SOUTH       ♦︎52
♣︎J9♠︎T74♣︎A53
5♥︎KQ734
10HCP14♦︎A8631FRK2
11♣︎QT1
Tricks Available (best play by both sides)
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
by
N
43447by
E
910996
by
S
43447by
W
910986
Board 13 Results
North-South Pair#NS
%
NS
MP
NS
Score
Contract
& Result
Op.
Ld.
EW
Score
EW
MP
EW
%
Pair# East-West
Pam Tomlins &
Tim Tomlins
X4N66 2.626804♥︎s+2♣︎A 1.3834X3EFrancesco L Piccone &
M Piccone
Eiler Eis &
Bob Hodgkinson
X5N66 2.626804♥︎s+2♠︎Q 1.3834X5EVicki Torbett &
Myrna Halpenny
Diane O Connor &
Seann Caldwell
X1N66 2.626804♥︎s+2♠︎Q 1.3834X2EBarbara Spitz &
Marlee Sheinin
John Fraser &
Linda Collins
X2N3 0.121702♣︎n+4♠︎3 3.8897X4EMike Bow &
Kelly Anderson
Section A Scores (three weeks ago)
ContractLeadResultN-S ScoreE-W Score
6♥︎sA♣︎= 1430
6♥︎s5♠︎= 1430
4♥︎s5♠︎+2 680
4♥︎s6♥︎+2 680
4♥︎s5♠︎+2 680
7♥︎n9♥︎-1 100
North-South's uncontested auction begins 1♣︎ (North) - 1♥︎, and a 4♣︎ rebid by North. Many of you will have heard of splinter bids, double jump bids showing game values, a fit, and a singleton in the suit bid. But 4♣︎ is the suit opened, how can North show a club singleton after opening 1♣︎. This is a special exception called the Impossible Splinter: it shows values for game, a guaranteed eight-card fit in partner's suit, and a good six-card first suit (and therefore some shortness elsewhere). South co-operates by cuebidding 4♦︎, and eventually Blackwood reveals a missing ace and 6♥︎ is the obvious choice. Defenders get the A♣︎ but no other trick.
#13 D  NORTH       Aug. 24, 2026
♠︎ Dealer: N
♥︎ AQ82 All Vul
V  WEST      ♦︎ K87V  EAST      
♠︎ QJ754♣︎ KQJ643♠︎ K9832
♥︎ T65♥︎ 93
♦︎Q2V SOUTH       ♦︎T943
♣︎A95♠︎AT6♣︎87
15♥︎KJ747
9HCP3♦︎AJ652FRK3
13♣︎T21
Tricks Available (best play by both sides)
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
by
N
86121112by
E
17121
by
S
86121112by
W
17121
Board 14 Results
North-South Pair#NS
%
NS
MP
NS
Score
Contract
& Result
Op.
Ld.
EW
Score
EW
MP
EW
%
Pair# East-West
Eiler Eis &
Bob Hodgkinson
X5N97 3.881504♥︎w–3♠︎Q 0.123X5EVicki Torbett &
Myrna Halpenny
Diane O Connor &
Seann Caldwell
X1N66 2.621103♣︎n=♥︎4 1.3834X2EBarbara Spitz &
Marlee Sheinin
Pam Tomlins &
Tim Tomlins
X4N19 0.75504♥︎w–1♣︎T 3.2581X3EFrancesco L Piccone &
M Piccone
John Fraser &
Linda Collins
X2N19 0.75503♥︎w–1♣︎A 3.2581X4EMike Bow &
Kelly Anderson
Section A Scores (three weeks ago)
ContractLeadResultN-S ScoreE-W Score
4♣︎n4♥︎= 130
4♥︎wQ♠︎-2 100
3♥︎wQ♠︎-1 50
4♥︎wT♥︎-1 50
5♣︎nA♠︎-2 100
3♥︎w*Q♠︎= 530
East opens 2♠︎ in first seat and South and West pass. North gets in with 3♣︎ and East and South pass. West now comes in with 3♥︎ and this ends the auction. Not wanting to lead or underlead an ace, North chooses a trump as the opening lead. Not leading a club and giving West a free trick is the key here, since now declarer must eventually lose the K♦︎ to South and a club will be led back, and the defenders will get two clubs and two diamonds. A fifth, setting trick will come in if West tries to ruff the last two diamonds, South will overruff the fourth one. 4♣︎ makes for North-South, but only on the 50% chance that the K♣︎ is in the West hand.
#14 N  NORTH       Aug. 24, 2026
♠︎ Q4Dealer: E
♥︎ T None Vul
N  WEST      ♦︎ AJ94D  EAST      
♠︎ 2♣︎ AQT975♠︎ AJT973
♥︎ AKQ832♥︎ 964
♦︎T873N SOUTH       ♦︎Q5
♣︎K6♠︎K865♣︎J8
13♥︎J756
12HCP8♦︎K626FRK4
7♣︎4320
Tricks Available (best play by both sides)
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
by
N
665810by
E
36832
by
S
665810by
W
36842
Board 15 Results
North-South Pair#NS
%
NS
MP
NS
Score
Contract
& Result
Op.
Ld.
EW
Score
EW
MP
EW
%
Pair# East-West
Pam Tomlins &
Tim Tomlins
X4N66 2.626903NTs+3♠︎3 1.3834X3EFrancesco L Piccone &
M Piccone
Eiler Eis &
Bob Hodgkinson
X5N66 2.626903NTn+3♠︎2 1.3834X5EVicki Torbett &
Myrna Halpenny
Diane O Connor &
Seann Caldwell
X1N66 2.626903NTs+3♠︎3 1.3834X2EBarbara Spitz &
Marlee Sheinin
John Fraser &
Linda Collins
X2N3 0.126003NTn=♠︎2 3.8897X4EMike Bow &
Kelly Anderson
Section A Scores (three weeks ago)
ContractLeadResultN-S ScoreE-W Score
3Ns3♠︎+4 720
3Nn2♠︎+3 690
3Nn2♠︎+3 690
3Ns3♠︎+1 630
3Ns3♠︎= 600
3Nn2♠︎= 600
North-South bid on their own with East-West passing throughout: 1♦︎ (South) - 1♥︎, 3♣︎ - 3♠︎, 3NT - pass. South's 3♣︎ rebid shows an unbalanced two-suiter and promises five diamonds; with 4-4 in the minors South would probably have rebid notrump (or spades with 4=1=4=4). North's 3♠︎ is interesting: it can be played as showing a stopper (so the stronger hand can bid 3NT) or asking for one (so partner can avoid 3NT when it will go down). Defenders probably should ask. In this case, South has a stopper and hopes to find enough in partner's hand to make nine tricks. If South plays West for the Q♣︎, twelve tricks come rolling in!
#15 V  NORTH       Aug. 24, 2026
♠︎ Q764Dealer: S
♥︎ AJT7 NS Vul
N  WEST      ♦︎ J8N  EAST      
♠︎ JT83♣︎ A94♠︎ K952
♥︎ KQ4♥︎ 9632
♦︎653D SOUTH       ♦︎T94
♣︎Q53♠︎A♣︎76
12♥︎851
8HCP3♦︎AKQ720FRK1
17♣︎KJT826
Tricks Available (best play by both sides)
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
by
N
129111212by
E
14111
by
S
129111212by
W
14111
Board 16 Results
North-South Pair#NS
%
NS
MP
NS
Score
Contract
& Result
Op.
Ld.
EW
Score
EW
MP
EW
%
Pair# East-West
Alexa Allen &
Jacquie Brown
X3N100 4.001801NTs+3♠︎6 0.000X5EVicki Torbett &
Myrna Halpenny
Eiler Eis &
Bob Hodgkinson
X5N75 3.001501NTs+2♠︎Q 1.0025X4EMike Bow &
Kelly Anderson
Pam Tomlins &
Tim Tomlins
X4N38 1.501201NTs+1♠︎3 2.5063X2EBarbara Spitz &
Marlee Sheinin
Joan Christensen &
Carol Linda Ward
X6N38 1.501202NTs=♠︎3 2.5063X6EDavid Rosenberg &
Alan Atkins
John Fraser &
Linda Collins
X2N0 0.00901NTs=♠︎3 4.00100X3EFrancesco L Piccone &
M Piccone
Section A Scores (three weeks ago)
ContractLeadResultN-S ScoreE-W Score
3Ns3♠︎+1 430
3NsQ♠︎= 400
2NsQ♠︎+2 180
2♣︎n9♠︎+2 130
2Ns2♠︎= 120
2♣︎n9♠︎= 90
West opens 1♠︎ and North passes. Many players hate to pass partner's one bids and will bid something with five or even four points. Here 1NT seems safe enough, until South doubles and collects 800. Or maybe West self-rescues to 2♠︎ and goes for 1100. There are decent five counts that you can bid with. Not this one: no high honours and no distribution. East should pass and let South re-open with a double, then bid 2NT over North's 2♣︎ response, to show a strong balanced hand. North passes and South might struggle a bit, but should eventually come to eight tricks.
#16 N  NORTH       Aug. 24, 2026
♠︎ 874Dealer: W
♥︎ 92 EW Vul
D  WEST      ♦︎ KJTV  EAST      
♠︎ QJ632♣︎ T7654♠︎ 95
♥︎ KT8♥︎ QJ65
♦︎Q76N SOUTH       ♦︎8532
♣︎A8♠︎AKT♣︎Q92
4♥︎A7432
12HCP5♦︎A942FRK1
19♣︎KJ30
Tricks Available (best play by both sides)
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
by
N
88789by
E
45554
by
S
88889by
W
45554
Board 17 Results
North-South Pair#NS
%
NS
MP
NS
Score
Contract
& Result
Op.
Ld.
EW
Score
EW
MP
EW
%
Pair# East-West
Joan Christensen &
Carol Linda Ward
X6N88 3.503♦︎e+2♥︎6150 0.5013X6EDavid Rosenberg &
Alan Atkins
Eiler Eis &
Bob Hodgkinson
X5N88 3.504♦︎e+1♣︎Q150 0.5013X4EMike Bow &
Kelly Anderson
Pam Tomlins &
Tim Tomlins
X4N50 2.005♦︎e=♣︎5400 2.0050X2EBarbara Spitz &
Marlee Sheinin
Alexa Allen &
Jacquie Brown
X3N25 1.005♦︎e+1♥︎9420 3.0075X5EVicki Torbett &
Myrna Halpenny
John Fraser &
Linda Collins
X2N0 0.003NTe+2♥︎2460 4.00100X3EFrancesco L Piccone &
M Piccone
Section A Scores (three weeks ago)
ContractLeadResultN-S ScoreE-W Score
6♦︎w9♦︎-1 50
5♦︎e5♥︎+1 420
5Nw5♣︎= 460
3Nw2♥︎+4 520
6♦︎e4♦︎= 920
6♦︎e9♥︎= 920
I filled in for a round when these boards were played two weeks ago and this was the first deal: partner East, opened 1♦︎ after North's pass, and South tossed in a 1♥︎ overcall. I made a negative double, North raised to 2♥︎, partner bid 3♦︎, and my 3NT call ended the auction. A low heart was led to my ten, and when I returned the Q♥︎ at trick two, it won, North thinking that the A♥︎ might be their last trick. Now I tried the Q♠︎, runnning it, and South thought winning the king might be their last trick, so the Q♠︎ won and I claimed: three in, plus the A♣︎, A♠︎, and eight diamonds! Too bad: two other pairs bid and made 6♦︎....
#17 D  NORTH       Aug. 24, 2026
♠︎ T73Dealer: N
♥︎ A732 None Vul
N  WEST      ♦︎ 9N  EAST      
♠︎ QJ84♣︎ K7652♠︎ A52
♥︎ KQT♥︎
♦︎82N SOUTH       ♦︎AKQJT753
♣︎AJT9♠︎K96♣︎84
7♥︎J986544
13HCP14♦︎641FRK10
6♣︎Q34
Tricks Available (best play by both sides)
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
by
N
22714by
E
1096129
by
S
22714by
W
1096129
Board 18 Results
North-South Pair#NS
%
NS
MP
NS
Score
Contract
& Result
Op.
Ld.
EW
Score
EW
MP
EW
%
Pair# East-West
Eiler Eis &
Bob Hodgkinson
X5N100 4.005004♥︎*w–3♣︎A 0.000X4EMike Bow &
Kelly Anderson
Joan Christensen &
Carol Linda Ward
X6N75 3.003♦︎n–1♥︎7100 1.0025X6EDavid Rosenberg &
Alan Atkins
Alexa Allen &
Jacquie Brown
X3N38 1.503♣︎e=♦︎7110 2.5063X5EVicki Torbett &
Myrna Halpenny
John Fraser &
Linda Collins
X2N38 1.503♣︎e=♠︎T110 2.5063X3EFrancesco L Piccone &
M Piccone
Pam Tomlins &
Tim Tomlins
X4N0 0.004♦︎*n–2♥︎7500 4.00100X2EBarbara Spitz &
Marlee Sheinin
Section A Scores (three weeks ago)
ContractLeadResultN-S ScoreE-W Score
4♠︎w*A♥︎-4 800
3♠︎w*A♣︎-2 300
3♦︎n7♥︎-1 100
3NeK♠︎= 400
3NwA♥︎+1 430
4♦︎n*4♠︎-2 500
West opens 1♠︎ after two passes and North overcalls 2♦︎, opting for safety while vulnerable. East passes and South makes a wild shot at 3NT, passed by West and North and doubled by East. South passes and so does West, but North panicks and tries 4♦︎, which is like entinguishing the fire with gasoline. East doubles again and when the smoke clears the cost is 500 or even 800. At my table filling in, partner East opened 1♦︎, South again overcalled 1♥︎, and I bid 3NT. Poor North led the A♥︎ and another one: I won and played a club to South's king, won the heart return, and led a second club, clearing the suit and the way for ten tricks!
#18 V  NORTH       Aug. 24, 2026
♠︎ 85Dealer: E
♥︎ AT NS Vul
N  WEST      ♦︎ JT98654D  EAST      
♠︎ A9763♣︎ A5♠︎ 42
♥︎ KQ954♥︎ 7
♦︎V SOUTH       ♦︎AKQ2
♣︎Q43♠︎KQJT♣︎J98762
9♥︎J86326
11HCP10♦︎737FRK6
10♣︎KT3
Tricks Available (best play by both sides)
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
by
N
66773by
E
66659
by
S
66773by
W
66659

Work In Progress! This HTML page with results combines the ACBLscore results, the BridgeMate data, and the actual cards in each hand to make a page that displays nicely on most screens. I'll continue to develop it as I hear about problems from people. So far I have only really had time to test it on the large monitor I have at home. I've done a little bit of work in making it fit on my iPhone 15 screen (turned sideways), but the typical cellphone screen is not wide enough to display the hands alongside the results, so it relocates the hands below the results and you may need to scroll down a bit. The key is in the tabs at the top, which mean you don't need to scroll to get from results to Board 32! Just click or tap on what you want to see next!

Two things that may help: If your browser program is old, some of the tech in this page might not work 100%: the system of tabs at the top of the page requires a recent version. You really aren't doing your computer many favours if you avoid requests to upgrade the programs you use most often, like browsers. If the page works but there are large areas of a monitor unused, you might be able to make it more readable by adjusting the size of things with CTRL + (plus key), which upsizes text and other screen elements a bit. CTRL + (minus key) also works if you go too far, and CTRL + (zero) resets to the default. (This doesn't work on cellphone screens.)

How is a pair's matchpoint score on a board calculated? Your raw score is compared one by one with all of the other raw scores on the board made by pairs sitting in your direction. You get one matchpoint for each score you beat, and a half-point for each score that is the same as yours. The top score on a board is one less than the number of times it is played. If the board was not played as many times as other boards for some reason, the scores may be factored up to compensate, so that each board has the same top score.

How is a pair's total score calculated? The scoring program first checks all boards to see how many times they have been played. Usually this will be the same for all boards, but if there is a sitout or a glitch of some sort in the movement, or an artificially assigned score due to an irregularity, the scoring program must first FACTOR scores on boards played fewer times, so that the top score on every board is the same. Once that is done, the scoring program also checks to see that each pair played the same number of boards: some may have sat out and missed a round: these pairs will have their total matchpoints FACTORED so that they get matchpoints for the boards they missed, based on their percentage on the boards they did play. The total of all this summing and factoring is your final score.

How does this factoring work exactly? There are actually two types of factoring: the most common is to factor a pair's score that has not played as many boards as the other pairs. Their sum of matchpoints on the boards they played, is divided by the number of boards they played, and then multiplied by the number of boards most pairs played. The other type is covered in the next question.

I have the best score on a board but got slightly fewer matchpoints than tops on other boards, why is that? This is the other type of factoring, which happens when a board is played fewer times than other boards for some reason. Maybe a pair didn't get to it, or there was a artificial score assigned after an irregularity. Factoring a board has to take into account the small chance that, had it been played the correct number of times, the extra plays might have produced a score that is better than the current top, or lower than the current bottom. To do so, the ACBL and the World Bridge Federation use the Neuberg formula, which you can read about on Wikipedia if you want the complete details. It has its detractors, but is sort of like Winston Churchill's ranking of democracy as the second-worst system of government ... all the others being tied for first!

HCP and FRK, what on earth are they? HCP stands for highcard points, and the four numbers surrounding it show how many points each player has in a hand. The colour behind the word "HCP" is gray when the 40 points are evenly distributed between North-South and East-West, but turns more and more orange (North-South) or purple (East-West) if one side has a majority. FRK stands for Freakness, a way to describe just how freaky a hand's distribution is, on a scale from 0-20, with average for a hand being just slightly less than 3, and the average for a full deal, the sum of the freakness ratings of the four hands, is about 11.93 on average. A hand gets one freakness point for each card in a suit beyond the fourth, or less than three; plus a bonus if the hand contains at least one void (2 points) or at least one singleton but no void (1 point). The background colour behind the "FRK" shows whether the deal is hot (red), average (gray), or cold (blue) in terms of Freakness! Freakness was created by bridge expert Richard Pavlicek and searching for "pavlicek freakness" will get you quickly to his article on the subject.

Something New! The tabs with the board numbers now indicate which side had the bulk of the high-card points (above the board number: NS: orange, EW: purple, evenly-split: gray), and the freakness rating of the deal as a whole (below the board number: flat: blue, average: gray, freaky: red)! Want to see only the hands where N-S had the points, or the freakiest ones? Check the tabs!

What are "tricks available" and how are they calculated? Computers these days can analyze all the possible legal play lines on a deal, given a trump suit (or notrump) and a declarer, and sort all of these lines into successes and failures to come up with an optimum line of play that perfect defenders and a perfect declarer would take. The result of this line of play is the "tricks available" and is sometimes unrealistic, requiring opening leads that few if any would find, or declarer taking only the finesses that work and dropping offside singleton honours where possible. You will very quickly see from the results which deals have unrealistic "tricks available" expectations, and it is often a fun exercise to work out how you can make that many tricks. But for most deals, it is a fairly good guide as to how high a pair should bid.

Why are the masterpoints not the same as what is on ACBL Live for Clubs? This is in my view an own goal by ACBL: they have new rules for club game masterpoints but are not willing to expend the time to upgrade ACBLscore to show the masterpoints under the new rules. Luckily, most masterpoint awards actually get bigger when they go through the "engine" and are reposted on Live. The main effect is to give more masterpoints to games where the non-sitting out pairs play more boards. The problem is that the masterpoint awards that come out of ACBLscore, before being posted online, are not what you eventually get.

How can I contact McBruce to tell him what's not working for me? By e-mail: oogashawca@gmail.com (the old shaw.ca address is gone)